DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

mandatory blood draws, are they constitutional?

  • No, it violates my rights as a person

    Votes: 24 88.9%

  • yes, they are clearly constitutional

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Total voters
    27
USFREEDOM911 said:
And you still can't do anything but emote, more's the pity.

If you truly believe that no victim means no crime, then why are you trying to promote that I'm wrong??

If no one is hurt, then who's the victim and why would it be a crime.

I honestly don't expect you to provide anything in the way of common sense of a reply and instead am enjoying watching you floundering in confusion. :D
Click to expand...

assinine.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You did by admission and you inability to refute my presentation.

Just remember, NO VICTIMS = NO CRIME.

Thanks :good4u:
Click to expand...

I told the cop that when I got busted in my early 20's for out running him. He said what would I have done if a kid ran out in front of me, I said a kid shouldn't be out at 1:30 in the morning. That didn't work!
 
RB 60 said:
"Currently, 12 states have statutes prohibiting DUI roadblocks,..."

https://dui.findlaw.com/dui-arrests/dui-checkpoint-laws-by-state.html

Once again, you are proven wrong, dickhead. They are even illegal in your own state! Why must you continue posting about shit you know nothing about?

ID


No

Case law: State v. Henderson, 756 P.2d 1057
Click to expand...

Legal. 1990. SCOTUS. 6-3,
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

Reasonable search

Checkmate again, cunt.
 
RB 60 said:
I was there, dipshit. And yes, a drunk can recognize when someone is arrogant. You accuse me of whining, yet you weren't there. The SOB cop was pissed I wasn't drinking when he said he smelled alcohol, then all but insisted I was drinking by saying he didn't believe me after I told him I didn't drink. So why didn't he haul me in for a blood test? Because he knew I'd be suing him for harassment, false arrest and false imprisonment. And bet your ass I would have. When a cop shows me respect, I show it back. This cop didn't.
Click to expand...

In case you were too drunk to pay attention, that post wan't to YOU, bitch. Into the Night wasn't there. Are you also Into The Night?

If someone you claim was "somewhat shitfaced" is cognizant enough of what was going on to make that kind of determination, he would be capable of driving. That means he was either too drunk, and therefore, not able to make that determination or he was and is only going on what you told him to believe. He can't be too drunk to drive yet not so drunk he can make that type of determination.
 
Into the Night said:
I don't have to be there. Stopping all drivers to see if any are drunk is not a reason.

Irrelevance fallacy.

RDCF.
Click to expand...
You absolutely have to be there. Without being there, you can't determine whether RB is telling you the truth or the typical drunk driver lying his ass off.

You also have to be there in order to determine whether his "somewhat shitface" friend could make the determination he made.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top