Since we have so many probable cause fans

D

Darth Omar

Russian asset
The Feb. 18, 2016 alert to Ukraine came from the Latvian prosecutorial agency responsible for investigating money laundering, and it specifically questioned whether Vice President Joe Biden’s younger son and three other officials at Burisma Holdings were the potential beneficiaries of suspect funds.

“The Office for Prevention of Laundering of Proceeds Derived from Criminal Activity … is currently investigating suspicious activity of Burisma Holdings Limited,” the Latvian agency also known as the FIU wrote Ukraine’s financial authorities.

The memo was released to me by the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s Office and confirmed by the Latvian embassy to the United States.

Latvian authorities said they did not get any incriminating information back from Ukraine to warrant further investigation and did not take additional action in 2016.

But the memo adds to the mounting evidence that there was ongoing investigative activity surrounding Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden’s compensation as a board member in the weeks just before Joe Biden forced the firing of the Ukraine prosecutor overseeing the Burisma investigation in spring 2016.

https://johnsolomonreports.com/latv...ged-suspicious-hunter-biden-payments-in-2016/
_______________

No ‘but John Solomon’s’ since Solomon has been right quite a bit. Most recently with the FISA abuse that is now an established fact. Solomon was way ahead of CNN on that.

What Solomon shows is probable cause for an investigation of Hunter Biden and Burisma. As we all know by now, probable cause is a low bar to clear: the Russian investigation was opened on scant evidence; similarly, Trump was accused of extortion/QPQ/bribery/abuse of power/whatever for asking Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden. Again, on scant evidence.

Well lol, here we have it: probable cause for an investigation of Hunter Biden and Burisma.

Hence, Trump was justified in asking Zelensky for one.

But...but..but.
 
If Hunter and Joe Biden are innocent they would want to testify in front of Congress

Well according to Jarod anyway
 
Darth Omar said:
The Feb. 18, 2016 alert to Ukraine came from the Latvian prosecutorial agency responsible for investigating money laundering, and it specifically questioned whether Vice President Joe Biden’s younger son and three other officials at Burisma Holdings were the potential beneficiaries of suspect funds.

“The Office for Prevention of Laundering of Proceeds Derived from Criminal Activity … is currently investigating suspicious activity of Burisma Holdings Limited,” the Latvian agency also known as the FIU wrote Ukraine’s financial authorities.

The memo was released to me by the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s Office and confirmed by the Latvian embassy to the United States.

Latvian authorities said they did not get any incriminating information back from Ukraine to warrant further investigation and did not take additional action in 2016.

But the memo adds to the mounting evidence that there was ongoing investigative activity surrounding Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden’s compensation as a board member in the weeks just before Joe Biden forced the firing of the Ukraine prosecutor overseeing the Burisma investigation in spring 2016.

https://johnsolomonreports.com/latv...ged-suspicious-hunter-biden-payments-in-2016/
_______________

No ‘but John Solomon’s’ since Solomon has been right quite a bit. Most recently with the FISA abuse that is now an established fact. Solomon was way ahead of CNN on that.

What Solomon shows is probable cause for an investigation of Hunter Biden and Burisma. As we all know by now, probable cause is a low bar to clear: the Russian investigation was opened on scant evidence; similarly, Trump was accused of extortion/QPQ/bribery/abuse of power/whatever for asking Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden. Again, on scant evidence.

Well lol, here we have it: probable cause for an investigation of Hunter Biden and Burisma.

Hence, Trump was justified in asking Zelensky for one.

But...but..but.
Click to expand...



trump will be impeached...enjoy
 
Darth Omar said:
The Feb. 18, 2016 alert to Ukraine came from the Latvian prosecutorial agency responsible for investigating money laundering, and it specifically questioned whether Vice President Joe Biden’s younger son and three other officials at Burisma Holdings were the potential beneficiaries of suspect funds.
Click to expand...


How dare you ... use reason, logic and facts.

:0)
 
katzgar said:
trump will be impeached...enjoy
Click to expand...

ziggy said:
EMCVME6W4AAw_ZY.jpg
Click to expand...

.
 
Teflon Don said:
If Hunter and Joe Biden are innocent they would want to testify in front of Congress

Well according to Jarod anyway
Click to expand...

Democrats are going to try every—any means, to keep that from happening.

Even if Bolton or whoever testifies that Trump linked the aid to the investigation—it won’t matter, if Hunter was dirty. And if Joe really did fire Shokin to shut down Shokin the wheels will do worse than drop off the Democrats Impeachment Buggy.

All Solomon needs to do is fax McConnell some documents. He’s probably done it all ready.
 
1. Shokin gets close to interviewing Biden
2.Hunter calls the State dept/ Nuland calls Poroshenko
3.Uncle Joe then calls Poroshenko 3x, and leaves for Ukraine where he demands the quid pro quo of firing Shokin
 
FastLane said:
Pyrrhic victory
Click to expand...

I refuse to make predictions lol.

But like I said in another thread, Durham will either indict some people or he will have some explaining to do. And I can’t imagine what that explanation would be. Getting caught omitting exculpatory evidence in a FISA application, then swearing under oath that it’s accurate...the indictment becomes a formality.

Unless they just want to ignore the law. ‘No one is above the law’ and all that.

Unfortunately, that probability is something greater than zero.
 
anatta said:
1. Shokin gets close to interviewing Biden
2.Hunter calls the State dept/ Nuland calls Poroshenko
3.Uncle Joe then calls Poroshenko 3x, and leaves for Ukraine where he demands the quid pro quo of firing Shokin
Click to expand...

There’s competing narratives on that.

Which means there’s only one way to see which is true.
 
the Latvian correspondence adds to a growing body of evidence that questions and investigations of Burisma were swirling in early 2016 just before Joe Biden used his authority as vice president to force the firing of Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in March 2016 by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid.

Shokin was overseeing a wide-ranging Ukrainian investigation of Burisma and has said he was making plans to interview Hunter Biden when he was fired by Ukraine’s president and parliament in March 2016 under pressure from Joe Biden.

Biden and his defenders have said he forced the firing of Shokin because the Ukraine prosecutor was an ineffective corruption fighter; Shokin alleges he was dismissed because he wouldn’t end the Burisma probe.
~~

When I first divulged Joe Biden’s role in Shokin’s firing last year, Democrats and their allies in the media and Ukrainian civil society organizations claimed it was no big deal because the Burisma investigation in Ukraine was dormant at the time Biden took action.

But since that time, significant evidence has emerged that the investigation was, in fact, active and that Burisma itself had concerns about the corruption allegations swirling around it.
~~~

On Feb. 2, 2016, the Ukraine prosecutor general’s office secured a court order to re-seize the assets of Burisma Holdings founder Mykola Zlochevsky. Officers went to the home, placed seizure notices and took items from the home that included a luxury car, officials said.

About two weeks later, the Latvian suspicious financial transactions memo was transmitted to Ukrainian authorities.

And then in late February, according to U.S. documents recently released under the Freedom of Information Act, Burisma’s American representatives pressed the U.S. State Department to try to help end the corruption allegations against the company. You can read those documents here.
https://www.scribd.com/document/433389210/Bluestar-Novelli-Contacts

By mid-March 2016, State’s top official for Ukraine policy publicly called for Shokin’s ouster, and less than three weeks later Joe Biden managed to force Ukraine’s president to fire Shokin by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees.

Almost immediately, Burisma’s American legal team was in Ukraine seeking to meet with Shokin’s replacement at the Ukraine prosecutor general’s office.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top