What it's like being terrorized out of your rights by Democrats--A first hand account


If this is supposed to be a link it doesn't work. :palm:

And yes, lying about voter fraud has been validated. Link below. It's only four pages so it shouldn't tax you to read it, even if you need to take a break after each page. :cool:

"Sensationalist claims have circulated this election season about the extent of voter fraud, with some politicians going so far as to tell voters to fear that this November’s election will be "rigged.” Because electoral integrity is one of the elements necessary to making America the greatest democracy in the world, claims like this garner media attention, and frighten and concern voters. But putting rhetoric aside to look at the facts makes clear that fraud by voters at the polls is vanishingly rare, and does not happen on a scale even close to that necessary to “rig” an election."

https://www.brennancenter.org/sites.../Briefing_Memo_Debunking_Voter_Fraud_Myth.pdf
 
Someone is bitter. :laugh:

Omigosh this isn't an act. You really are as dumb as dirt. It's pretty clear that if a person leaves the Dems (or any party) to follow trump, they are far too stupid to be with us. The party's collective IQ rises after every newly-minted trump supporter leaves.
 
If this is supposed to be a link it doesn't work. :palm:

And yes, lying about voter fraud has been validated. Link below. It's only four pages so it shouldn't tax you to read it, even if you need to take a break after each page. :cool:

"Sensationalist claims have circulated this election season about the extent of voter fraud, with some politicians going so far as to tell voters to fear that this November’s election will be "rigged.” Because electoral integrity is one of the elements necessary to making America the greatest democracy in the world, claims like this garner media attention, and frighten and concern voters. But putting rhetoric aside to look at the facts makes clear that fraud by voters at the polls is vanishingly rare, and does not happen on a scale even close to that necessary to “rig” an election."


https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...BxAP&usg=AOvVaw1J1nBcV4PXPNjY7taYsTRS&ampcf=1
 
Omigosh this isn't an act. You really are as dumb as dirt. It's pretty clear that if a person leaves the Dems (or any party) to follow trump, they are far too stupid to be with us. The party's collective IQ rises after every newly-minted trump supporter leaves.

Says the person who has utterly humiliated themselves about a dozen times so far on this thread alone with hilarious blunders, garbage logic, and gullible misinformation.

And you sound even more triggered and butthurt now, snowflake.

:laugh:

:yayaseesathreadban:
 
Omigosh this isn't an act. You really are as dumb as dirt. It's pretty clear that if a person leaves the Dems (or any party) to follow trump, they are far too stupid to be with us. The party's collective IQ rises after every newly-minted trump supporter leaves.

What a pleasure it's been, watching you deftly defeating every moronic "Armpitius" post. Thank you! It's wonderful to watch a master swordswoman at work, carving up the butthurt triggered twit.

:laugh: at Armpitius
 
:stup2:

No one said demonstrations are violence...or even suggested anything like that, you fucking imbecile.

:rofl2:

Learn how to read. YOUR OWN SOURCE confirms the people in question were already being assaulted, or that Democrats were trying to assault them. Advocating self defense isn't doing what Democrat leaders do. It isn't encouraging unprovoked political violence.

Do you EVER think before embarrassing yourself? :laugh:

^^ Lies and the lying liars who tell them. This is what MY OWN SOURCE printed, stupid.

1. trump rally Dayton- protestor jumps barricade near stage before being jumped by SS; no attack on audience.
2. trump rally St. Louis - demonstrators interrupt rally, get escorted out; no attack on audience.
3. trump rally Fayetteville - trump supporter sucker punches black man; cops then attack the black man also; no attack on trump supporters.
4. trump supporter Mcgraw who attacked black man in NC says in a brief interview with Inside Edition that Jones deserved it, adding that "the next time we see him, we might have to kill him."
5. trump says violence against protestors at his rallies is appropriate and he wanted to see more of it
 
What a pleasure it's been, watching you deftly defeating every moronic "Armpitius" post. Thank you! It's wonderful to watch a master swordswoman at work, carving up the butthurt triggered twit.

:laugh: at Armpitius

He is a
7781_Loser.png
. :laugh:
 
^^ Lies and the lying liars who tell them. This is what MY OWN SOURCE printed, stupid.

1. trump rally Dayton- protestor jumps barricade near stage before being jumped by SS; no attack on audience...

Um...no. Learn how to read your own sources, genius. :stup2:

:palm:

And I quote:

"No, I mean like trump telling his cult “If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato [attempted assault, hence Trump was talking about RESPONDING to violence, otherwise known as self-defense, genius], knock the crap out of them, would you?” Trump said at a 2016 rally in Iowa. “Seriously, OK. Just knock the hell — I promise you I will pay for the legal fees, I promise.”

Or, "at a campaign rally in Kansas City on Saturday, the day after the unrest in Chicago, Trump addressed an earlier event in Dayton, Ohio, when a protester tried to storm the stage [attempted assault, hence Trump was talking about RESPONDING to violence, otherwise known as self-defense, genius]. The candidate said he would have fought the person had he reached the lectern and mimed punching him a few times. I'll beat the crap out of you," he then mouthed."

Or, At a press conference in Florida earlier on Friday, Trump was asked about his rhetoric in the wake of an incident in which a supporter at a rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina, sucker-punched a black man in the face. While he wasn't asked about that specific altercation, Trump said of violent behavior in general at his events: "The audience hit back [against assaults, hence Trump was talking about RESPONDING to violence, otherwise known as self-defense, genius] and that's what we need a little bit more of." He also praised people using physical force at his rallies as "appropriate."...

Comprehending it yet? :laugh:

Overall, we rate Just Facts Right-Center Biased based on promotion of information that favors the right. We also rate them Mostly Factual for reporting due to unbalanced fact checks that favor the right. :laugh:

Another diversionary "attack the source" fallacy. And? :dunno:

What else is new? The left's biased media "fact-checkers" have been caught in more lies than CNN at this point...and these are the kinds of "fact-checkers" arbitrarily labeling others as biased. :bs:

Try again. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
2 charges passed the house. We do not need to find shit. trump is a crook.

One of the articles just went up in flames. The judiciary is now about to destroy the "obstruction" nonsense. And the other is provably invalid. It's literally based solely on third and fourth-party conjecture, assumptions, and feelings about something that wasn't even a crime or controversial, and that Obama should have been impeached a hundred times over if it were suddenly somehow impeachable.

IOW, Democrats forcing through a 100% partisan vote based on provably erroneous garbage in no way establishes anything except that Democrats are power-abusing partisan hacks.

Try again. :bs:

View attachment 13551
 
Back
Top