So who wants witnesses

PoliTalker said:
Hello Southern Chicken,



Oh, how convenient. Throw it all into the courts to be dragged out for years and years? And the reason this is unacceptable is somehow not understood?
Click to expand...

That's the process,right? The courts interpret a separation of powers. You have problems with the constitution.
 
Darth Omar said:
How is he wrong?

There are at least potential national security issues with Bolton testifying and Trump has the authority to block it/him with that annoying executive privilege thing. It’s ‘the problem’ with Bolton.

Trump’s opinion doesn’t matter and neither does ours: it’s up to senate democrats and how bad they want to hear from Bolton.

The poll numbers suggest they should put Hunter Biden on the stand. In addition to some others.
Click to expand...

Then Bolton or Trump's lawyers can invoke executive privilege to the question, not the entire testimony.
 
domer76 said:
Here's the way it works in real trials. When a person is indicted based on existing evidence, any additional evidence discovered AFTER the indictment can still be offered at trial. That's the case here, dumbfuck. More information is becoming available almost every day. IN ADDITION to the evidence sufficient to impeach.

Comprende, moron?
Click to expand...

Senate rules not judicial rules, idiot
 
Bolton is a Right-Wing radical. Even if he testified before Congress he would claim Executive Privilege on any question that would require a truthful answer that would hurt Donald Trump.

He cannot be trusted. He is just looking to feather his own nest with a book deal

He is already an asshole for not telling Congress what he knows and without even having to be asked.

Now he is just writing a book trying to capitalize on the position he had.

Just another typical hateful Republican with an ax to grind and looking out for No. 1.
 
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
How is he wrong?

There are at least potential national security issues with Bolton testifying and Trump has the authority to block it/him with that annoying executive privilege thing. It’s ‘the problem’ with Bolton.

Trump’s opinion doesn’t matter and neither does ours: it’s up to senate democrats and how bad they want to hear from Bolton.

The poll numbers suggest they should put Hunter Biden on the stand. In addition to some others.
Click to expand...

If the President wishes to actually invoke executive privilege he has to explain specifically explain why it applies in this case. This power cannot be used frivolously. It is for a distinct purpose.

It is not a matter of simply throwing the executive privilege card and declaring it hands-off. EP is subject to review. It needs to be verified that it is a legitimate use of the power.
 
The trial is a sham. Trumptards are just sitting through it and will summarily break their oaths and acquit the Orange criminal.

Cheating is allowed. It's the new rule. Even when caught red handed. It's totally OK
 
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
The trial will be whatever the majority of the Senate says it will be about.

It’s not the Schiff Show now.
Click to expand...

And as Chairman Schiff pointed out, additional information and evidence continues to come out, and more will come out going forward. What Schiff didn't say was how silly the Republican Senate is going to appear down the road if such a volume of evidence comes out that it becomes irrefutable, and the Republican Senate back in January voted not to delve further into these very troubling allegations. If the Republican Senate runs a sham trial with no witnesses and no additional evidence, and Trump is later shown to be absolutely guilty beyond any doubt after evidence the Republicans refused to look at comes out, that is going to play very badly for any Republicans running for office in November.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top