If trump were as innocent as Republicans claimed, you would think Republicans would want as many witnesses as possible.
I don't want to believe you're stupid, so let's go with you are just not a thinker, kind enough?
Logic, another one of your probably not so strong suits, but work with it
would cause one to ask what would a John Bolton testimony bring to the Democrats case.
Would he likely say , best case for the Democrats that "Trump wanted his political opponent investigated"?
As if they need one more person to verify that for them. The case they brought over to the Senate has included evidence that they have already established that.
As a matter of fact their entire case is based on the fact that they have already established that Trump wanted his political opponent investigated, and held up aid to get that to happen.
if the evidence they already have does not prove that, then they maybe should not have voted to impeach? logical? Impeaching a president , which they did, is a pretty tall order. That evidence had better be pretty damn good already, set in stone.
So why Bolton? because this has nothing to do with proving it to the Senate, evidence is already overwhelming right? they impeached the man...
it's a show to persuade the American people that they are right so they might think twice about voting for Trump in
2020.
In other words they are using their political office to influence the 2020 election.
Which is exactly what they are accusing Trump of doing.
the swamp is in full flow mode, either pay attention, or not, we don't care. trump is not going to be removed, might want to concentrate on a strategy in beating him in November that doesn't involve doing exactly what you are accusing him of doing.
