If the goal was to make Trump politically stronger

DEATH TO AMERICA said:
People saying that there can be no political involvement in impeachment are literally retarded. This is politics. Impeachment by its very nature cannot not be political. If you demand that every impeachment that is political be invalidated you are literally saying that impeachment should be impossible. It is never going to happen no matter what the President does that impeachment won't be political. Trump could literally rape a woman in broad daylight on camera and Trumpsters would find a way to defend him. Plus there is zero reciprocity, failing to impeach purely on political grounds, that is totally OK apparently. Only impeaching on political grounds is a sin. God you weak liberal fuckers make me sick. It should have been political from the beginning. I am tired of all this song and dance where people do political things and pretend someone they're not political. We are political beings. Everything is political. When you breathe, it is political.
Click to expand...

What is it about “partisan” you don’t understand Desh?
 
Kimbo Kush said:
im not panicking. i am very chill, drinking some chamomile tea at the moment, ina. perfectly zen state. I am very content because I keep winning, and your side keeps losing, like the impotent liberals that you are. Nationalism is back baby. Brexit 2020. Trump 2020.
Click to expand...

Meh I don’t know about that. Conservatives are famous for winning battles and fighting wars they’ve already lost.
 
It’s already been established that the Articles did not rise to the level of impeachment.

Bolton is a moot issue.
 
Earl said:
It’s already been established that the Articles did not rise to the level of impeachment.
Click to expand...

Earl is doing another one of his post spamming, where he posts the same thing to multiple threads without caring what the thread is.

And he is posting nonsense. It has been established by the sole constitutional authority on the subject that the articles do rise to the level of impeachment. He may disagree, but that is his opinion, not established fact.
 
DEATH TO AMERICA said:
Fuck this country. If it undermines the President, fucking good. Fuck the executive. Fuck America. I hate this country. I hate every American. I want this country to burn to the fucking ground.
Click to expand...
lol..Iran awaits. just go to the border and burn some US and Israeli flags and chant "death to America"
I'm sure you'd be welcome -dont come back
 
Teflon Don said:
Then the democrat party can say MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

President Trump is now politically stronger heading into 2020

He has beaten back two attempts at a soft coup. First was Mueller and now this.

He has effectively put the party in his back pocket

Barring something catastrophic he wins re-election easily
Click to expand...

I'm still trying to get an answer as to why neither article of impeachment mentioned Russian collusion. I thought that was what prompted this whole thing 3 years ago?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Meh I don’t know about that. Conservatives are famous for winning battles and fighting wars they’ve already lost.
Click to expand...

That's hilarious being that this entire impeachment nonsense is based on left wingers still fighting an election they lost in 2016.

Take you ass kicking and try to regroup.
 
Walt said:
Earl is doing another one of his post spamming, where he posts the same thing to multiple threads without caring what the thread is.

And he is posting nonsense. It has been established by the sole constitutional authority on the subject that the articles do rise to the level of impeachment. He may disagree, but that is his opinion, not established fact.
Click to expand...




ac·quit·tal
/əˈkwid(ə)l/

noun
noun: acquittal; plural noun: acquittals

a judgment that a person is not guilty of the crime with which the person has been charged.

"the trial resulted in an acquittal"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top