A trial without witnesses is unconstitutional.
- Thread starter Rune
- Start date
Which is a mistake, having Senators elected by popular vote or having two from each State?
Into the Night
Verified User
Yer fucking stupid
THE HOUSE POLITBURO PRESENTED THE TESTIMONY OF SEVENTEEN WITNESSES IN THE SENATE.
MAKEUP SOME MORE LIES....
THEY CONTINUE TO COVERUP THE TESTIMMONY OF THEIR EIGHTEENTH WITNESS, THE IC IG, FOR SOME REASON...DEPSITE THEIR NONSTOP LIES ABOUT "THE TRUTH"....
The evidence witnesses provided was given. What the founding fathers would have not done is supported a kangaroo court that occurred in the House.
You idiots had your chance, just like you did in 2016, and you got your asses kicked again. The only reaction you have is to whine and tear up papers. At least Nancy wore white when she surrendered.
One thing I did notice about your witness claim is that anytime a mention of having the whistleblower testify as a witness, the lefties that demanded witnesses ran from having testify.
Notice he "would have" like he has a clue what the founders would have done.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Flash,
Try as Republicans might, the impeachment was not about Democrats. Democrats did their duty to the Constitution to fight corruption. The timing was not of their choosing, nor was the calling to impeach, but they bravely rose to the task and carried out their oaths. Only a minority have been calling for impeachment, and those were for other valid reasons which still remain. The impeachment was very professionally done. The Trump cult sympathizers can call it anything they want and surely will; that doesn't change that the President violated his oath and compromised the security of the USA and the integrity of our elections. He should have been removed from office. The vote to convict was bipartisan. He only escaped through the power of propaganda and twitter. If Nixon had had the same power he would have remained in office as well. If what Trump did was not impeachable nothing is. Trump is a disgrace to the office and the nation. He should own up and step down. And apologize to the nation and the world. (If he wanted to do the right thing)
Try as Republicans might, the impeachment was not about Democrats. Democrats did their duty to the Constitution to fight corruption. The timing was not of their choosing, nor was the calling to impeach, but they bravely rose to the task and carried out their oaths. Only a minority have been calling for impeachment, and those were for other valid reasons which still remain. The impeachment was very professionally done. The Trump cult sympathizers can call it anything they want and surely will; that doesn't change that the President violated his oath and compromised the security of the USA and the integrity of our elections. He should have been removed from office. The vote to convict was bipartisan. He only escaped through the power of propaganda and twitter. If Nixon had had the same power he would have remained in office as well. If what Trump did was not impeachable nothing is. Trump is a disgrace to the office and the nation. He should own up and step down. And apologize to the nation and the world. (If he wanted to do the right thing)
Into the Night
Verified User
You don't get to speak for the Founding Fathers. You only get to speak for you.
Trails to not require witnesses.
Into the Night
Verified User
You don't get to speak for the Founding Fathers. You only get to speak for you.
That said, the Constitution of the United States does not support a kangaroo court, or bar the accused from calling and presenting witnesses, or from the right to cross examine any witnesses, or from the right to face his accuser (all of which were unconstitutionally denied by the House Democrats and especially by Schiff and Queen Nancy.).
The Constitution is quite clear on the authority of the House. Queen Nancy does not have authority over the Senate. She does not have authority over the President. She ignores these restrictions as well. She even tried to ignore the votes from her own house.
The Constitution is quite clear on the requirements of any article of impeachment brought against the President. Neither article presented to the Senate met these requirements, and were themselves unconstitutional, and those in the House approving such articles violated the Constitution as well.
Into the Night
Verified User
Superfreak
Verified User
Witnesses were heard from in the House. Schiff and Dems said they proved their case 100%... why do you think they needed more witnesses?
Into the Night
Verified User
Yes it is.
WRONG. Democrats violated the Constitution multiple times.
Yes it was.
Yes it was. The House VOTES to impeach, dumbass.
Violating the Constitution is not carrying out their oath.
WRONG. The House VOTED to impeach, dumbass. That means a majority...all Democrats.
Void argument fallacy.
It was a disaster, especially for the Democrats.
Never did.
YOU don't get to overrule the Senate. You are no the king.
Romney is effectively a Democrat. He's just a chameleon. He's a turncoat.
WRONG. The vote of the Senate is not propaganda or twitter.
Nixon wasn't impeached.
Extreme argument fallacy.
Is that why he was elected? Is that why he will be re-elected?
Own up to what? Void argument fallacy.
For what? Void argument fallacy.
YOU don't get to declare 'the right thing'. You are not the king.
Superfreak
Verified User
Yeah, so much bullshit that the trump lawyers were afraid to call them as witnesses at the actual trial.
kind of like Schiff and Dems being too scared to let the whistleblower testify to how he worked with Schiff to set this whole thing up?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Proof? Nice to know that you don't care about the safety of people who anonymously report wrongdoing in government.
christiefan915
Catalyst
The testimony was all negative for trump. Why didn't the Senate repubs want to cross-examine these people under oath and expose what they think were lies?
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Trump is a liar and everybody knows it.
Superfreak
Verified User
Enough of that bullshit. We all know who the whistleblower is. This has nothing to do with his safety. This has to do with the Dems colluding with him to start yet another fake story.