Shocking absolutely no one...

Does ANYBODY still listen to Trump???

About 40% of voters, unfortunately. I still don't think we are going to have elections in November. I think Trump is going to try and use the second wave as the reason to cancel them. That's why he wants to open everything back up...he wants there to be a second surge so he can invoke emergency powers to cancel the election out of "safety". And he has a subservient GOP to protect him when he does. After all, they wouldn't remove him for committing treason in order to rig the 2020 election, so they'll stand idly by as he cancels this one because they all know they're toast in November.
 
About 40% of voters, unfortunately. I still don't think we are going to have elections in November. I think Trump is going to try and use the second wave as the reason to cancel them. That's why he wants to open everything back up...he wants there to be a second surge so he can invoke emergency powers to cancel the election out of "safety". And he has a subservient GOP to protect him when he does. After all, they wouldn't remove him for committing treason in order to rig the 2020 election, so they'll stand idly by as he cancels this one because they all know they're toast in November.
so we had elections during the civil war but we can't do it during COVID?

Another of your fruit cake prognostications
 
so we had elections during the civil war but we can't do it during COVID?

You're the ones who will argue it's not safe, after arguing it was during the first surge.

Just wait...it'll happen. You're not very difficult people to figure out.


Another of your fruit cake prognostications

Well, considering I've been right about how terrible Trump has been, that I predicted the tax cut would never hit 3% growth, that it would depress revenue, that it wouldn't create jobs, and that Trump will try to cheat in 2020, I have a bit more credibility on this than you.

It's funny how all mentions of hydroxychloroquine has stopped.
 
Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
so we had elections during the civil war but we can't do it during COVID?


WTF. Just when I think these rubes can't outdumb themselves, they raise the bar with a 28ft fosberry flop of pure dumbass. :)

Dickha thinks Civil war best practices should be applicable today. Back then they also sawed your leg while you bit a bullet when you got an infection.
Should we do that too?
 
You're the ones who will argue it's not safe, after arguing it was during the first surge.

Just wait...it'll happen. You're not very difficult people to figure out.




Well, considering I've been right about how terrible Trump has been, that I predicted the tax cut would never hit 3% growth, that it would depress revenue, that it wouldn't create jobs, and that Trump will try to cheat in 2020, I have a bit more credibility on this than you.

It's funny how all mentions of hydroxychloroquine has stopped.

No they haven't Loathsome Vagina, there are currently at least a dozen trials in progress. Kindly shut your piss flaps!!

https://www.biospace.com/article/no...y-of-hydroxychloroquine-in-covid-19-patients/
 
About 40% of voters, unfortunately. I still don't think we are going to have elections in November. I think Trump is going to try and use the second wave as the reason to cancel them. That's why he wants to open everything back up...he wants there to be a second surge so he can invoke emergency powers to cancel the election out of "safety". And he has a subservient GOP to protect him when he does. After all, they wouldn't remove him for committing treason in order to rig the 2020 election, so they'll stand idly by as he cancels this one because they all know they're toast in November.

:) hahaha ....
I think mail in Voting might become popular.
 
Anti-malarial drug Drumpf touted is linked to higher rates of death in VA coronavirus patients, study says
Patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and an antibiotic combination received no benefit in rates of death or in use of a ventilator
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...tes-death-va-coronavirus-patients-study-says/

it depends on the patient population

there are patients that hydroxychoroquine works for and it has nothing to do with the bug

you would of course have to have an understanding of these things outside of what you learned on Wikipedia, but you aren't interested in that.

You aren't interested in patients getting better. You are solely interested in bashing Trump. With that said, go fuck yourself
 
it depends on the patient population

there are patients that hydroxychoroquine works for and it has nothing to do with the bug

you would of course have to have an understanding of these things outside of what you learned on Wikipedia, but you aren't interested in that.

You aren't interested in patients getting better. You are solely interested in bashing Trump. With that said, go fuck yourself

Face it; it doesn't work, Karen. It's not a miracle cure, and it isn't even really a miracle treatment. It doesn't cure COVID, and there's no evidence that it is even effective at treating the symptoms.

You were wrong about it, as predicted, because you're wrong about pretty much everything thanks to your shit instincts and poor judgment.
 
You're the ones who will argue it's not safe, after arguing it was during the first surge.

Just wait...it'll happen. You're not very difficult people to figure out.
another fruitcake prognostication! justifying the previous fruitcake prognostication!

Well, considering I've been right about how terrible Trump has been, that I predicted the tax cut would never hit 3% growth, that it would depress revenue, that it wouldn't create jobs, and that Trump will try to cheat in 2020, I have a bit more credibility on this than you.

It's funny how all mentions of hydroxychloroquine has stopped.
tax reform increased overall revenue, jobs and good jobs were created - so Trump cheating is anther??

I give you credit for comic relief -nothing else
 
Face it; it doesn't work, Karen. It's not a miracle cure, and it isn't even really a miracle treatment. It doesn't cure COVID, and there's no evidence that it is even effective at treating the symptoms.

You were wrong about it, as predicted, because you're wrong about pretty much everything thanks to your shit instincts and poor judgment.
It's a small study -a review of practices actually, and doesn't account for dosages, time of administration
( the earlier the symptoms show the better), underlying conditions, or combining with zinc.

Basically the NIH is saying it can't confirm hydrox and ZPAK works.
 
another fruitcake prognostication! justifying the previous fruitcake prognostication!

You mean like the fruitcake predictions that "we'll have deaths down to zero" or "it won't kill as many as the flu" or "the tax cut will lead to 3% growth"?

Those were all predictions you made.
 
Back
Top