Dems plan immediate climate action.

Superfreak said:
....

you need to spell that out for me, because I am not following your math. Saying that the energy extractable is extended by a factor of 60... translates how exactly to waste is reduced by 95%????
Click to expand...

The energy extractable is extended by a factor of 60 translates to waste reduced by 98%.
 
Superfreak said:
...

"greenies" aren't causing energy prices to rise. DEMAND is doing so. As the world population grows and countries like China and India (etc...) continue to develop, demand for energy goes up.... the prices follow.
Click to expand...
As supplies are restricted the same thing happens- prices rise.
 
Southern Man said:
Thanks for making my point. That's a "future" project.
Click to expand...

You are friggin moron. They have been working on this for over a decade. It shows morons like you that the costs have indeed been reduced in that time and the fact that they are opening the production facility should be plain enough for morons like you to comprehend that it is viable.... NOW.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... I said specifically that I was unaware of what he was talking about and that I was interested in reading more on it. To you that is a a refusal to learn anything good about it? Even after I specifically stated that my objection to nuclear was the waste component?

Try pulling your head out of your ass. You will find the air much fresher.
Click to expand...

Ok. If your queries for knowledge are sincere, I will consider your recommendation.
 
Superfreak said:
You are friggin moron. They have been working on this for over a decade. It shows morons like you that the costs have indeed been reduced in that time and the fact that they are opening the production facility should be plain enough for morons like you to comprehend that it is viable.... NOW.
Click to expand...
Since you have ventured into a blatant personal attack it is quite apparent that your intellectual argument has failed and I have therefore triumphed over you on this little debate.
 
Southern Man said:
Since you have ventured into a blatant personal attack it is quite apparent that your intellectual argument has failed and I have therefore triumphed over you on this little debate.
Click to expand...

Do you have that in a notepad file on your desktop or something to cut and paste from?
 
uscitizen said:
If we do something and then no global warming then it worked didn't it?
Umm kinda like no more attacks since 911 and Bush taking credit.
Click to expand...


LOL yep. I called the MO two years ago when I said thet 98 was the peak and the scientists pushing warming alarmism knew the climate was going to shift so it was imparative that the kyoto was signed so they could claim CO2 reductions worked!!. LOL

Now it's too late for the warmers. We've had cooling and the CO2 rose 4% LOL
 
I am still not saying global warming is not happening. 20 yrs is a short time in climate change time. Not even a fart worth of time to the earth.
I will not live to see the warming anyway.

Your problem :bleh:
 
uscitizen said:
I am still not saying global warming is not happening. 20 yrs is a short time in climate change time. Not even a fart worth of time to the earth.
I will not live to see the warming anyway.

Your problem :bleh:
Click to expand...

Yeah. SO it doesn;t really matter to you if this green shit works or not. You = nullified.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Ok. If your queries for knowledge are sincere, I will consider your recommendation.
Click to expand...

They are. I will look at ANY source of energy that allows us to reduce dependence on foreign energy. My primary concern with nuclear is the waste component. If it is as he states and can be reduced 95% then that is something I was completely unaware of, which is why I requested more information.
 
Southern Man said:
Since you have ventured into a blatant personal attack it is quite apparent that your intellectual argument has failed and I have therefore triumphed over you on this little debate.
Click to expand...

No, I was simply highlighting your stupidity. You offer up one-liners without ANY evidence to support what you are saying. THAT is the sign of someone without a valid argument.
 
Superfreak said:
They are. I will look at ANY source of energy that allows us to reduce dependence on foreign energy. My primary concern with nuclear is the waste component. If it is as he states and can be reduced 95% then that is something I was completely unaware of, which is why I requested more information.
Click to expand...



That concern just seems out of priority considering that the alternatives being leapt to on faith, are not even capable of providing the same power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top