LMAO, Now the righties are complaining that no bible was used at 2nd swearing in

I guess that pesky US Constitution saying there is no religious requirement to hold the office is just going to be ignored by those who want to scream about this one.
 
You miss the point, per usual. He claims to be a man of Christ. Obviously he lied.

Not at all. He made a point of getting a specific bible of a man who he holds in high regard and using it for his inauguration. The fact that they redid the swearing in was trivial.

Edit: His second swearing in was done without a bible, so that means that he understands that he can use his faith to guide him but he is the head of a secular government.
 
Last edited:
So he makes a big deal of it in front of the public, but then tosses out those convictions when it's not convenient. Why am I not surprised? It was a pattern in his entire campaign.
 
So he makes a big deal of it in front of the public, but then tosses out those convictions when it's not convenient. Why am I not surprised? It was a pattern in his entire campaign.

Exactly what conviction did he toss out? He didn't deny being a christian. He didn't go against any christian principles. He took the oath of office with Lincoln's bible, and then they decided to retake the oath to avoid any hint on impropriety due to the misspoken lines, and they didn't have the bible handy.

I think this is a prime example of making mountains out of molehills. I guess if this is the worst you can say about him, he is far ahead of the previous president.
 

So WHERE is anyone complaining about "no bible"

Just making shit up again as usual ???


Don't confuse anything USCitizen says with the truth....

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/01/22/obama_bible/index.html

Salon took a screen shot of it, because Drudge has a history of pulling headlines when he gets some heat, and pretending they were never up.

In other words, don't confuse anything Drudge, or you for that matter, says with the truth.

Your apology to usc?
 
Whew, as someone who is skeptical of Drudge but unquestioningly accepting of anything from Salon.com, this is quite a relief to me.

Salon is nothing like Drudge, but that's irrelevant...if you know what a screen shot is. If you don't, then I guess this would be a confusing situation for you.

Drudge had the headline, period.

Bravo owes an apology, and he issue it in a large, bold font.
 
Salon is nothing like Drudge, but that's irrelevant...if you know what a screen shot is. If you don't, then I guess this would be a confusing situation for you.

Drudge had the headline, period.

Bravo owes an apology, and he issue it in a large, bold font.

Well, not so fast.....

(LMAO, Now the righties are complaining that no bible was used at 2nd swearing in)

SOOOOO....Where are all these righties complaining about no bible....?

Salon says "Where was the bible" and then plainly states..."No, just kidding."

Does that constitute Complaining about something....? Sounds like they're trying to be funny, and thats far far from complaining....

Is Drudge complaining? He personally doesn't even comment on it one way or the other.....

So I think I'll hold that apology for another time....though there may be someone complaining somewhere, nothing in the US post even remotely constitutes righties complaining...

but I'll concede US does post the truth sometimes....
 
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/01/22/obama_bible/index.html

Salon took a screen shot of it, because Drudge has a history of pulling headlines when he gets some heat, and pretending they were never up.

In other words, don't confuse anything Drudge, or you for that matter, says with the truth.

Your apology to usc?

Like I said...WHERE ARE RIGHTIES COMPLAINING ABOUT IT???

Don't you comprehend what you read....?
You think the drudge headline was complaining?

If he had a headline, "Its snowing in New York"...does that mean hes complaining about it snowing in NY? A statement of fact is not necessarily a complaint
 
Last edited:
Like I said...WHERE ARE RIGHTIES COMPLAINING ABOUT IT???

Don't you comprehend what you read....?

Shut up Bravo you are starting to get on my nerves, I don't want to have to bring up your mother?

If you bothered to read the story you'd see that people such as Glenn Beck are bitching about it, and pretending that Sludge isn't, is willful denial.
 
Shut up Bravo you are starting to get on my nerves, I don't want to have to bring up your mother?

If you bothered to read the story you'd see that people such as Glenn Beck are bitching about it, and pretending that Sludge isn't, is willful denial.

Yeah, getting the snot knocked out of your inane left wing accusations must get to you sooner or later.....so go ahead with your childish Mother comments....it says alot about you....now
==============

Glenn Beck claims, wrongly, that every previous president has sworn his oath of office on a Bible.

OK...lets see what Beckerhead said...."that every previous president has sworn his oath of office on a Bible. "....and sure enough...hes wrong about that....he don't know what the hell hes talking about....
But is he complaining? Thats a stretch....


Salon says:
Beck took it one step further, claiming, "I've checked -- we have never had a president sworn into office without a Bible... Does this bother, or just make anybody go, 'Wow, that's a first?'"

Salon points out the same thing....Beck is wrong...he don't know what the hell hes talking about...
Complaining or criticizing ?...Ok maybe he is...and Beck is probably just looking to make trouble.....like you in that respect....

Hes one asshole (like you).....one clown ( like you)....when you come across 5 or 10 righties complaining about the lack of a bible come back and I'll issue US an apology....

Glenn Beck all by himself, hardly constitutes "righties critizing the lack of a bible....

And Drudge makes no complaint at all, except in you warped imagination...

It pains me to be right all the time.....but then I analyze what I read before running off at the mouth...
 
Last edited:
A lot is two words Bravo. Jesus you are practically illiterate aren't you?

oh look, the spelling nazi

and you bitch about my titles...your title is meadowmuffins, where are all the righties who are bitching, one person, two persons?

i forgot to include constuction workers, you intentionally slandered an entire group
 
For the record, I thought Obama's speech was excellent. One thing that was refreshing, is that he can get away with quote after quote from the Bible, and no one goes ballistic because he is a D. One of the fringe benefits of having a Dem president.

SM is just being retarded.
 
There were more blacks in S africa but they still lived under apartheid, so that's not a good argument.

The fact is, we have had 43 white male Presidents, 0 women, and of course Obama who has shattered one barrier, which is good for us all.

A lot is two words Bravo. Jesus you are practically illiterate aren't you?

I can no longer resist pointing out that there have only been 42 white males prior to Obama. For some reason, we count that oaf Cleveland twice just because he lost once before getting re-elected.
 
Back
Top