A Confederate statue is coming down today

AProudLefty said:
How does relocating statues destroy "vestiges of the past"?
Click to expand...

You're focusing on the where. The why they're being taken down and/or relocated shows just how easily triggered a bunch of whiny snowflakes can be.

Maybe all the MLK statues should be relocated to the parking lot of the Lorraine Motel pointing at Room 306.
 
CFM said:
You're focusing on the where. The why they're being taken down and/or relocated shows just how easily triggered a bunch of whiny snowflakes can be.

Maybe all the MLK statues should be relocated to the parking lot of the Lorraine Motel pointing at Room 306.
Click to expand...

I don't hear you complaining about the museums.
 
AProudLefty said:
I don't hear you complaining about the museums.
Click to expand...

I do hear snowflakes complaining about the statues.

Anything on moving the MLK statues?

I been to many places and seen many of the streets named after MLK. For the most part, including the one where I live, they are located in lower economic, ghetto areas. How fitting for someone that wanted his people to be judged by the content of their character yet they prefer to be judged by the color of their skin with things like affirmative action.
 
CFM said:
I do hear snowflakes complaining about the statues.

Anything on moving the MLK statues?

I been to many places and seen many of the streets named after MLK. For the most part, including the one where I live, they are located in lower economic, ghetto areas. How fitting for someone that wanted his people to be judged by the content of their character yet they prefer to be judged by the color of their skin with things like affirmative action.
Click to expand...

No idea on the MLK Jr. statues. Do you have a source?
 
If Democrats in cities that are controlled by Democrats are going to ignore laws about rioting, looting, burning, assaults and murders, perhaps the Civil Rights Laws should be ignored.

Fair is fair.
 
katzgar said:
Statues to Americans can stay but the character edified should have context explained. Statues to traitors/losers/confederates need to be moved away from a place of prominence to a place of to a place they are merely historic novelties. Keep in mind the statues in NOLA were public health hazards in that one form of protest was to pee on them. Put up statues to notable Americans...trailblazers like Lewis and Clark or Frank Lloyd Wright or Neal Armstrong or Ansel Adams or even Mark Twain would all be great candidates. If the south truly wants to be the new south statues that are effectively to slavery need to go.
Click to expand...
A lot of hate in there. Just say "confederates". Labeling anyone who defended their state against Federal invaders as a "traitor" or "loser" makes you sound like Trump. I could call you "Trumpzgar". LOL.

Seeking to remove something as a "health hazard" because people are peeing or shitting on it means that could be done to anything. Otherwise, thanks for the definition. Other than the discussed, I can agree with it as a solution. I'd prefer to build context around it rather than taking down, but I also support States' Rights.
 
Earl said:
If Democrats in cities that are controlled by Democrats are going to ignore laws about rioting, looting, burning, assaults and murders, perhaps the Civil Rights Laws should be ignored.

Fair is fair.
Click to expand...

Jesus, Earl. Take your fucking medication. Should Trump ignore the Second Amendment and start confiscating guns because some Lefties have guns? Two wrongs don't make a right. You would have known better in your Air Force days.

View attachment 17056
 
RB 60 said:
Nice people aren't "offended" by a few sitting relics of our history. They should be motivated not to repeat it. Apparently, they're missing that reminder.
Click to expand...

Disagreed on "offended" since political extremists on both sides are offended by all sorts of stupid shit. Agreed people should be motivated to make things better.

The problem is that very unhappy racist beta males like CFM and volsrock would still be shitting themselves if a statue of famous African-Americans were placed in front of or near each of those statues along with plaques describing how ignorant it is to be racist and divisive.


View attachment 17058
 
Last edited:
If Democrats in cities that are controlled by Democrats are going to ignore laws about rioting, looting, burning, assaults and murders, perhaps the Civil Rights Laws should be ignored.

Fair is fair.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
A lot of hate in there. Just say "confederates". Labeling anyone who defended their state against Federal invaders as a "traitor" or "loser" makes you sound like Trump. I could call you "Trumpzgar". LOL.

Seeking to remove something as a "health hazard" because people are peeing or shitting on it means that could be done to anything. Otherwise, thanks for the definition. Other than the discussed, I can agree with it as a solution. I'd prefer to build context around it rather than taking down, but I also support States' Rights.
Click to expand...


you are a typical white nationalist. you dont give a crap about others, you are just all about you. If you expect blacks to be truly part of the culture you wanting to celebrate slavery needs to stop.
 
Earl said:
If Democrats in cities that are controlled by Democrats are going to ignore laws about rioting, looting, burning, assaults and murders, perhaps the Civil Rights Laws should be ignored.

Fair is fair.
Click to expand...


thats not what is happening you racist scum bag
 
CFM said:
You've already been caught.

The better question is how many will you be honest enough to admit you have.
Click to expand...

Translation: I don't have a fucking clue.

Your angry paranoid delusions aside, I have no socks and I don't use a VPN like some here. I've been online since 1986. Yes, I've experimented with socks years ago, but in the end, it's stupid and self-defeating as Teflon Don and Legion keep proving. I've never had a sock on this or previous forums. If banned from a forum, I leave. Sometimes even a temp ban. It's stupid to return to a forum that is biased against me when there are so many others to choose from.

Do you belong to Trinnity's Stormfront Lite forum? USMB is, or was, very right wing. I'm still a member there but left three years ago so I don't know about them today. There are a handful of others. PM me if you want to know their titles. Trinnity bans anyone who doesn't kiss her or her GF's fat, drunken asses and that included banning me. Rather than using a sock, I just enjoy posting about it on every forum I can find.

The only person who I think can justify having ONE sock is a forum owner, administrator or mod ala' the Prince and the Pauper. It allows them the freedom to be "one of the guys" without everyone avoiding them because of their position. Even so, IMO, they should use their official username sparingly and never, ever abuse their power as a result of being "one of the guys". I'm none of those and have no desire to be responsible for anything except myself. As such, I have only one username.

Like Mark Twain once wrote, "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything." I like things being fun and easy. Telling the truth is more fun and easier than the lying fools who use multiple sock puppets.

View attachment 17057
 
Last edited:
katzgar said:
you are a typical white nationalist. you dont give a crap about others, you are just all about you. If you expect blacks to be truly part of the culture you wanting to celebrate slavery needs to stop.
Click to expand...

Trumptzgar, people like you are the #1 reason to vote Republican because you represent the typical Democrat: a lying POS who falsely labels others and attacks them with lies for not agreeing with them 100%.

If you really supported the best of American ideals, you'd act less like Trump and more like JFK or Carter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top