Wow Obama really has it in for Pakistan

Darla said:
If you bother to read my posts, you will see that I stated that Pakistan reported that the strikes killed 3 children, and that in fact, I used the term, murder. So as usual, you are just emoting.
Click to expand...
A whisper in a whirlwind compared to the shouting you would have done if it were Bush.

But, m'eh. :dunno: if it makes you feel better. I didn't vote for the CIC in either instance where somebody was bombing people in Pakistan.
 
Damocles said:
A whisper in a whirlwind compared to the shouting you would have done if it were Bush.

But, m'eh. :dunno: if it makes you feel better. I didn't vote for the CIC in either instance where somebody was bombing people in Pakistan.
Click to expand...

Bush was bombing that area of Pakistan weekly over the past couple of months. Feel free to find any posts where I was "shouting" about it.

and nice try and pretending you didn't vote for bush in 2000.
 
Darla said:
If you bother to read my posts, you will see that I stated that Pakistan reported that the strikes killed 3 children, and that in fact, I used the term, murder. So as usual, you are just emoting.
Click to expand...

so obama is guilty of murder...but because it is obama, it is not a war crime :rolleyes:
 
Darla said:
It's just an extension of the same policy we have been pursuing all along, and for that reason, I don't believe this will explode into chaos and a nuclear confrontation. In fact, Pakistan itself didn't even bother to complain about it.

On Rachel Maddow's show last night, she said that Obama didn't even have to approve the missile attacks. Apparently the CIA just does them. He was told about them, but his approval was not needed. Of course, he could have stopped them. When he chose not to, he owned this, and the deaths which resulted.

And I don't support air strikes of any kind, no matter who is in office. I understand the argument that there are people out there hoping to kill Americans. But I support approaching it as a criminal matter, with the caveat that in certain situations I definitely support an execution in the field.

But never air strikes. And the "responsibility" lies with every American tax-payer, just as it always has. I was as responsible when George Bush was President, as were you.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree.

Fighting terrorism with the military is flawed from top to bottm .. except there is a hidden agenda here that never gets mentioned .. pipelines.

That's why we're in Afghanistan.
 
Yurt said:
no

and they are not technically wars
Click to expand...

Yet you are the same guy the other night who was arguing that congress is responsible for declaring wars, therefore Bush isn't responsible for Iraq.

No wonder everyone on this site thinks you're a schmuck.
 
blackascoal said:
I know you didn't .. which is exactly why I asked .. especially given how you were pressing Darla.
Click to expand...

all you had to was ask. i really don't see what my ""pressing"" darla has to do with anything. are you her defender or something? was i too hard on her?

i don't have enough information to judge whether the airstrikes are crimes or not. darla said they were murder, but that obama is not guilty of murder...strange when she has no problem saying bush is guilty for the same.
 
Yurt said:
all you had to was ask. i really don't see what my ""pressing"" darla has to do with anything. are you her defender or something? was i too hard on her?

i don't have enough information to judge whether the airstrikes are crimes or not. darla said they were murder, but that obama is not guilty of murder...strange when she has no problem saying bush is guilty for the same.
Click to expand...

Ask is exactly what I did .. and I got the exact answer I expected.

Darla is fully capable of defending herself .. why are you so paranoid of answering a simple question?

As you said .. you don't have a clue.

That was my point.
 
blackascoal said:
Ask is exactly what I did .. and I got the exact answer I expected.

Darla is fully capable of defending herself .. why are you so paranoid of answering a simple question?

As you said .. you don't have a clue.

That was my point.
Click to expand...

whether i don't have enough information re pakistan has absolutely nothing to do with my "pressing" darla on her claims.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top