If trump loses election in 2020 & refuses to leave, will you support him??

Arks&sparka said:
Well thanks to Trump and other politicians like him I can defend myself.
Click to expand...

Which is an unfortunate truism. Too bad we have to pick between two groups of assholes and morons. Both serve their party first and neither serves the best interests of the nation first.
 
Arks&sparka said:
lol having an opinion doesn't require fascism. You people have said that word so often it now just means anybody you disagree with
Click to expand...

Bullshit. There are plenty of politicians and activists I disagree with that I haven't called Fascist. This is a red herring argument on your part.

Paranoid delusions aren't reality.
Click to expand...

That's nice, but you didn't answer the question.
How would checks and balances stop someone from believing in Fascism?
 
StoneByStone said:
Bullshit. There are plenty of politicians and activists I disagree with that I haven't called Fascist. This is a red herring argument on your part.
Click to expand...
you calling Donald Trump a fascist it's a paranoid delusion. I don't need to make a red herring to distract from your paranoid delusion.


That's nice, but you didn't answer the question.
How would checks and balances stop someone from believing in Fascism?
Click to expand...
I don't placate paranoid delusion. The only way for you to come out of your insanity is for people to point out that it's insanity.
 
StoneByStone said:
Bullshit. There are plenty of politicians and activists I disagree with that I haven't called Fascist.
Click to expand...
Of course that is totally irrelevant. You indiscriminantly hurl the word "fascist" around whenever and at whomever you are so ordered by your party, e.g. at Donald Trump.

StoneByStone said:
How would checks and balances stop someone from believing in Fascism?
Click to expand...
How would checks and balances stop someone from accusing "FASCIST!"
 
Arks&sparka said:
Show that they would think it was on the right track if there were 30 parties.
Click to expand...

You're looking at it. There are over 30 parties in the US, but only two major parties. A better topic would be asking how can that be changed? Constitutional amendment changes are notoriously difficult to ratify. One way to work around that is for the States themselves to exercise their 10th Amendment rights on a variety of issues. If they coordinate with a majority of other states to find mutually satisfactory solutions, then, as states, they each can bring about unified change. That too is hard, just not as hard as an Amendment change.

Those seeking a Convention of States have found out how hard that is to organize.
 
StoneByStone said:
I don't have a party.
Click to expand...
You really do, you just haven't told us the name.

StoneByStone said:
#deflection
Click to expand...
Yes, you just did ... and you make it look so effortless.

So the technique is to somehow accuse someone who is making a great point or who is asking a tough question of something like deflection or evasion or diversion ... and then add a "#" and you are done! Awesome. I'll have to give it a try.
 
IBDaMann said:
You really do, you just haven't told us the name.

Yes, you just did ... and you make it look so effortless.

So the technique is to somehow accuse someone who is making a great point or who is asking a tough question of something like deflection or evasion or diversion ... and then add a "#" and you are done! Awesome. I'll have to give it a try.
Click to expand...
Soooo now you believe you're a mind-reader?

Deflection comes easy to you, but I believe it's part of "the sickness" so it's not your fault.


You have already, but you use "mantra", not hashtags.

Should I make this my new signature?
4h6uws.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Soooo now you believe you're a mind-reader?
Click to expand...
Sometimes, yes ... like right now ... your mind is coming through loud and clear ... and that is CONFUSION. You don't know which way is up. You can't differentiate between people. You are in a sad shape at the moment.

Dutch Uncle said:
Deflection comes easy to you,
Click to expand...
You're thinking of someone else, which is not to come as any sort of surprise. I never deflect. I'm the guy that always gives a thorough response. Don't worry about not recognizing that.

Dutch Uncle said:
You have already, but you use "mantra", not hashtags.
Click to expand...
You are still on tap to show me where I have done that. I suspect that you have researched this and discovered in each case that you are confusing me with someone else, which you probably do with everyone since you cannot distinguish between people.

Dutch Uncle said:
Should I make this my new signature?
4h6uws.jpg
Click to expand...
Absolutely! You'd be hard-pressed to find something that better expresses your confusion.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
You're looking at it. There are over 30 parties in the US, but only two major parties. A better topic would be asking how can that be changed? Constitutional amendment changes are notoriously difficult to ratify. One way to work around that is for the States themselves to exercise their 10th Amendment rights on a variety of issues. If they coordinate with a majority of other states to find mutually satisfactory solutions, then, as states, they each can bring about unified change. That too is hard, just not as hard as an Amendment change.

Those seeking a Convention of States have found out how hard that is to organize.
Click to expand...

If these third parties had any appeal they wouldn't be obscure third parties I think the two-party system is rather organic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top