Cali bill to legalize and tax cannabis

Topspin

Verified User
Speaking at a landmark press conference today, California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) introduced comprehensive legislation to tax and regulate the commercial production and sale of cannabis in a manner similar to alcohol.

“With the state in the midst of an historic economic crisis, the move towards regulating and taxing marijuana is simply common sense. This legislation would generate much needed revenue for the state, restrict access to only those over 21, end the environmental damage to our public lands from illicit crops, and improve public safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes”, Assemblyman Ammiano said. “California has the opportunity to be the first state in the nation to enact a smart, responsible public policy for the control and regulation of marijuana.”

The proposal is the first marijuana legalization bill ever introduced in California.

“It’s time for California taxpayers to stop wasting money trying to enforce marijuana prohibition, and to realize the tax benefits from a legal, regulated market instead,” said Dale Gieringer, director of California NORML, a sponsor of the bill.

As introduced, Ammiano’s measure would allow for the licensed production and sale of cannabis to consumers age 21 and over. Licensed cultivators would pay an excise tax of $50 per ounce of cannabis. In addition, the proposal would impose a sales tax on commercial sales. (Ammiano’s proposal would not affect the state’s medical marijuana law, allowing patients and caregivers to grow their own medicine.)

If enacted, the measure would raise over $1 billion per year in state revenue, according to an economic analysis by California NORML, available online here.

Ammiano’s bill comes at a time of growing public support for legalizing marijuana. A recent Zogby poll reported that nearly six in ten west coast voters support taxing and regulating marijuana like alcohol.

Faced with a $40 billion budget deficit, other public officials have joined in endorsing Ammiano’s bill, including San Francisco Sheriff Mike Hennessy and Betty Yee, a member of the State Board of Equalization, which oversees collection of sales taxes.

Currently, tens of millions of dollars are paid annually in state and local taxes by licensed distributors of medical marijuana. However, these sales only represent a fraction of the overall statewide marijuana market. “The millions of dollars raised each year on the sales of medicinal cannabis is only the tip of the iceberg,” Gieringer said. “Kudos to Assemblyman Ammiano for proposing a path-breaking bill that would benefit our economy, safety and freedom by making marijuana a winning proposition for California.”
 
Cool, I hope it succeeds where Arizona has so-far failed. And since they are right next door, I'm sure there are a lot of activists in AZ who can help CA activists run the campaign for it.
 
stupid assed worthless gesture which will go nowhere. cannabis is, and will remain, illegal and untaxable until it is removed from the CSA. California will be stopped by federal courts the moment that they try to implement this.
 
2 things not so smart
1 Oakland already does it to a smaller degree
2 Obama has pledge to end the ghestspo like federal raids in states with medical marijuana.
 
2 things not so smart
1 Oakland already does it to a smaller degree
2 Obama has pledge to end the ghestspo like federal raids in states with medical marijuana.

Ending federal raids on medical marijuana users and growers and looking the other way while a state the size of CA creates a legal market for pot with all of the attendant bells and whistles of commercialization (think advertising) are two entirely separate matters altogether.
 
2 things not so smart
1 Oakland already does it to a smaller degree
2 Obama has pledge to end the ghestspo like federal raids in states with medical marijuana.

you might want to reread the article and stop looking so stupid while trying to look smarter than I am.

This isn't about medical marijuana, it's about commercializing marijuana, which the feds will not allow to happen. Oakland does NOT already do this.
 
Oakland dispenceries pay taxes on jk sales. The laws are changing, how long the rednecks and Nazi's fight it is the only question.
 
Oakland dispenceries pay taxes on jk sales. The laws are changing, how long the rednecks and Nazi's fight it is the only question.

willfull ignorance much? the article had zero to do with medical marijuana.

keep your head in the sand though. you look better that way.
 
This could fix their budget shortfall.

Just having gotten on the scene, I would much rather this be used to raise taxes than what they had originally planned to do...which is raise taxes across the board.

I'm not making any big purchases right now, so I don't pay much sales tax since groceries are tax free, but to raise the income tax and the gas tax especially would hurt right about now.

Especially since Obama just cut my withholding, it's going to suck that it's all going back to Sacramento.
 
all of the wishful thinking is irrelevant. every voting person in california could vote this in to being and it wouldn't make a damned bit of difference. read gonzalez v. raich.

you want this to become a reality? convince congress, not your state legislature. they have no power over this issue.
 
all of the wishful thinking is irrelevant. every voting person in california could vote this in to being and it wouldn't make a damned bit of difference. read gonzalez v. raich.

you want this to become a reality? convince congress, not your state legislature. they have no power over this issue.

You're right, of course, but the states getting together on this issue can eventually create a confrontation with the Federal Government that will produce change.
 
This could fix their budget shortfall.
It could if it wasn't ruled that the Commerce clause applies and federal laws take precedence. They simply will not be allowed to package and sell an illegal substance, it won't matter what state laws they pass.
 
The states can't do anything about the federal regulation, but they're under no responsibility to help them out by keeping it illegal under their statutes. Of course the federal courts could do nothing about this law.
 
Back
Top