Because it was talk. he does not take orders from her.
So the only way to verify mail in ballots is by SIGNATURE??
- Thread starter Irish
- Start date
Because it was talk. he does not take orders from her.
That's still far less than how many voted by mail this time around. 2016's numbers aren't particularly noteworthy in this respect.
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
This year had 96 million.
You keep saying I am wrong about everything, yet, have never been able to prove that. All you do is flap your jaws. Like a typical uneducated Democrat.
It was not just talk you sheep following dumb fuck. Democrats rely on stupid sheeple like you. So did Hitler.
Only in 2016 was there fraud/interference.
And then she said "Resist" You do not think things through before you flap your lips.
Like Gore... And he's following Hillary's advice. The reality is, things will play out and all this will be history in just a few short weeks.
Good thing you do not have to enter your address and precinct to take money out. That would be much tougher. toss in having to register to be permitted to get money. Your vote is entered into the precinct poll book and your signature is matched.. Oh yeah, computers compare them.That Is pretty rigorous.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Context?
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I was pretty young when the Bush vs Gore election happened. But from what I know, the entire election hung on one state and it was a difference of around 400 votes. In a situation like that, I can understand wanting a recount.
However, the 2020 election wasn't nearly that close. In order to change the results, Trump would have to find fraud in a bunch of state where the difference in votes is in the thousands. In addition to that, there have already been lawsuits that were thrown out because the moment Trump's lawyers are put under oath, they admit that there is no evidence of fraud.
So basically, this is all about one mentally challenged snowflake throwing yet another tantrum while asking his simps for money.
The main thing we should pay attention to is that even though Gore didn't concede until December 13th the world did not end.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
So by "resist," she didn't actually mean she was refusing to concede.
Glad we settled that.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Yes, but it was a different situation. With Gore, there were legit questions. With Trump, it's just a refusal to accept Democracy. And any time Fascism goes this mainstream, we should be concerned.
If you can find 30 fraudulent votes out of 1,000 in any election, I would be very supportive of intense investigation. The problem is you can only find such numbers in an election supporting a Republican.
trump has not been able to find any of the massive fraud that he claims, and it should be easy to find.
Yep, which means a lot more opportunity for fraud.
Bush was given briefings and support for the transition within a week of the election. trump is trying to block any transition support. It looks like trump might try to block the transition up to January 20th. If he tries to block the transition after that, he will find out what happens to trespassers in the White House.
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
Trump committed fraud. And, like you, I don't need to provide any real evidence.
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
Trump is the first internet president. He rose to office on the power of conspiracy theories--ideas that, prior to the internet, wouldn't have received serious consideration.