SCOTUS must step in. States will NOT admit they broke the law and rigged the election

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Having recounts and audits means the people who counted the vote the first time will do it again and naturally they will cheat again. There is no way biden got 50,000 straight votes and no way there were sequences where biden got 600,000 and trump 3,000. The SCOTUS has to declare the vote void in at least PA WI MI and GA . Then neither candidate will have the 270 electoral votes needed and the 50 state legislatures will vote and trump should win that.

Remember - there is no way 80 million americans voted for a proven child molester like pedo-joe.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Having recounts and audits means the people who counted the vote the first time will do it again and naturally they will cheat again. There is no way biden got 50,000 straight votes and no way there were sequences where biden got 600,000 and trump 3,000. The SCOTUS has to declare the vote void in at least PA WI MI and GA . Then neither candidate will have the 270 electoral votes needed and the 50 state legislatures will vote and trump should win that.

Remember - there is no way 80 million americans voted for a proven child molester like pedo-joe.
Click to expand...
1hyZ.gif
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Having recounts and audits means the people who counted the vote the first time will do it again and naturally they will cheat again. There is no way biden got 50,000 straight votes and no way there were sequences where biden got 600,000 and trump 3,000. The SCOTUS has to declare the vote void in at least PA WI MI and GA . Then neither candidate will have the 270 electoral votes needed and the 50 state legislatures will vote and trump should win that.

Remember - there is no way 80 million americans voted for a proven child molester like pedo-joe.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Hawkeye10 said:
And has regretted it ever since.

Plus another 20 years of rot has set in.
Click to expand...

HOW SO ?? THEY RULED IN FAVOR OF THE CONSTITUTION AND EXISTING ELECTION LAWS, AN A CASE BROUGHT BEFORE THEM.

READ THE PER CURIAM OF USSC 00-949. BRILLIANT, AND COULD HAVE GONE NO OTHER WAY.
 
Grokmaster said:
HOW SO ?? THEY RULED IN FAVOR OF THE CONSTITUTION AND EXISTING ELECTION LAWS, AN A CASE BROUGHT BEFORE THEM.

READ THE PER CURIAM OF USSC 00-949. BRILLIANT, AND COULD HAVE GONE NO OTHER WAY.
Click to expand...

And so expecting SCOTUS to do the right thing here is almost certainly going to result in disappointment.
 
I will say here what I have been telling Stone over multiple threads over multiple weeks:

"I admire your optimism but it is not going to happen, this Dark Age is later than you think".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top