Texas sues Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania over election fraud

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Your position completely ignores court rulings on situations like this.

First all the Supreme Court already refused to take up an appeal on this exact same argument in October. That means that the USSC is the court that had final say in leaving this ruling in place. So any errors were the result of the USSC refusing to take the case. You are arguing that the USSC violated the Constitution which I doubt they will be willing to accept.

Other Supreme court rulings have said that voters should not be punished because of errors by election officials such as if the voters were given wrong information or even illegal information. As long as the voter acted in good faith their votes should be counted. Since the actual error that left this in place was a ruling by the State Supreme Court and a denial of appeal by the USSC court the fault is not the result of the voters so the votes should count based on legal precedent.

Then you have failed to tell us how many ballots actually came in after Nov 3. A quick Google check says that only 10,000 arrived after Nov 3. Trump lost the PA election by 81,000 votes. Those 10,000 ballots would not change the outcome of the election. The legal precedent is that unless the illegal or fraudulent votes would change the outcome the election stands. In this case, it would clearly not change the election so Biden won PA.

There is no Constitutional or rational reason to throw out the votes of 7 million PA voters. The alleged illegal votes being counted would not have changed the election. The voters acted in good faith believing the USSC's refusal to accept the appeal was the final word on voting.
Click to expand...

WRONG. Fake ballots are not voters. There are millions of votes in question. The Supreme Court did accept the appeal. It's still pending.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Just to show you how idiotic your position is, let's accept that another state can claim that their voters are harmed by voting practices in another state. Under that ruling, a state could claim that Texas' districts are unfairly drawn using gerrymandering which causes Texas to elect more Republicans then they normally would thus harming that other state by how Texas is represented in Congress. The Republican voters in Texas only need to get 48% of the total vote to elect 70% Republicans which in turn dilutes the Democratic votes in every other state. Because the districts are gerrymandered it means that the legislature in Texas is not really representative of Texas voters and is therefore Unconstitutional under the equal protection clause and any action by the Texas legislature because of that gerrymandering harms every other state in the Union.
Click to expand...

Let 'em file.
 
Into the Night said:
WRONG. Fake ballots are not voters. There are millions of votes in question. The Supreme Court did accept the appeal. It's still pending.
Click to expand...

Wong. The Supreme Court rejected the only appeal that reached it. The present case is not an appeal but an original action. The court has not yet acted on it except for
setting a deadline of today for the sued states to respond. Most people familiar with the law expect the Court to dismiss the case as legally unfounded.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
eat shit, moron. we had an election. your lard and master trump got his ass kicked. you are still crying like a little bitch. get over it, pussy.
Click to expand...
You mean "get over it" the way you fudge packing degenerates "got over it"? lol


No thanks, I happen to love this country. This keeps going until you perverts are gone. ;)
 
Granule said:
You mean "get over it" the way you fudge packing degenerates "got over it"? lol


No thanks, I happen to love this country. This keeps going until you perverts are gone. ;)
Click to expand...

funny how every time a chickenshit bitch trump voter gets put in his place, they start fantasizing about being gay and packing fudge and whatnot. I do not care about your personal life or what his name is, or even if it is just a barnyard animal, you still do not know shit about reality.
 
Port Tack said:
If someone didn't like the fact PA modified election law they should have said something before the election. There is no fucking way any court in the land is going to throw hundreds of thousands of votes away after the election. This is not to mention they are only squabbling over those ballots received AFTER election day and not those received before election day and counted AFTER election day. Biden is still your president in another 4 weeks.
Click to expand...

That is what the court said in MI which threw out their case yesterday. If they were concerned they should have filed suit before or after the change was made. Instead, they waited until they lost before they cared about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top