Texas sues Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania over election fraud

[Into the Night]

If SCOTUS pushes this into the House

They can't. They don't have that authority.

and Trump won

A definite possibility.

then the Regressive Left will make at a top priority to take vengeance on SCOTUS....As SCOTUS knows.

They've made it top priority to take vengeance on anyone and anything not Democrat. Why should SCOTUS feel left out?

In the recent past fear has tended to work to keep people docile, and you already know that I consider this court to be low quality.

People can surprise you though.

Looks like you might be very surprised the way this goes.

 

[Into the Night]

I disagree. The scotus must send the election to the House. This is the Revolution America needs to go thru, to drain the swamp and create a transparent gov't that puts all Americans First.

No, SCOTUS cannot send the election to the House. They cannot change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

You have misread my post, I am saying that the elite did what they could to drive down expectations of a clean vote even as they did what they could to drive up the chaos of the vote....part of that was to make it easier to cheat and get the job done of denying Trump but too part of it was give SCOTUS an excuse to not do what it should do. Because of all of the threats that have been made against SCOTUS recently the expectation is that SCOTUS will reach for the excuse to not act that has been manufactured for that purpose.

The Regressive Left is very sold on the idea that fear works.

That they are. It isn't working either.

 

[Into the Night]

It is very rare for judges to be threatened as they are now, for instance almost never is court packing considered something to talk about for more than a minute and a half, because it is so barbaric and costly in the long run....but that is where we are.

They are always threatened by some thug somewhere.

 

[Into the Night]

What variance, margin of error or statistics.

You have no clue about statistics. Ask me how I know.

 

[Into the Night]

You just watch them.

Vain hope.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes and they will do it today by 3 o'clock. They will deny the ridiculous suit in it's entirety.

Vain hope.

 

[Into the Night]

If someone didn't like the fact PA modified election law they should have said something before the election.

They did. A federal court did.

There is no fucking way any court in the land is going to throw hundreds of thousands of votes away after the election.

What election? That sham in PA?

This is not to mention they are only squabbling over those ballots received AFTER election day and not those received before election day and counted AFTER election day.

Denial of evidence. Denial of history. Denial of court dockets.

Biden is still your president in another 4 weeks.

Biden has to win first, dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep, they didn't overturn 2016 either.

Irrelevance fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

The signature checks were done and they no longer exist, there will be no second signature checks. The ones counted were the ones that passed your signature check.

Lie. Fake ballots have no signature check.

 

[Into the Night]

As fucked in the head trump supporters are I'm sure you could find thousands to swear it was rigged. If trumpers feel it is rigged they should stay home in GA and show the country just what happens when trumpers don't participate.

Argument of the stone fallacy. You can't just discard witness testimony.

 

[Into the Night]

the courts would have ruled there was no standing because there were (at that time ) no damages.
They stole the election, the courts wont touch it -and yes that includes SCOTUS still burned from Bush v Gore

SCOTUS did the right thing then, and they will probably do the same thing now. Back then, they ordered the Florida State legislature to act and choose it's electors, or abstain. The legislature acted and chose Bush.

 

[Into the Night]

No, 18 other states did not join the suit. Of course red states back the suit but there is only one state bringing it. The supreme court will tell Texas to go eat shit today.

Yes they did. Denial of court docket.

 

[Into the Night]

Even Sen. Cornyn has stated he doesn’t understand the suit.

Irrelevant.

 

[Into the Night]

Can we count on you to realize the next president is Biden when they tell you to go fuck yourself they aren't hearing it?

The Supreme Court can't ignore this.

 

[Into the Night]

first like with the vaccine that the UK has already given over 100,000 of it's residents while we haven't given the first one? Sounds like we will be second at best.

Go to the UK and go stand in line now!

 

[Into the Night]

Yep. Every state will just sue every other state, asking that that states election results be tossed in the trash. The Supreme Court can hear a few thousand of these state vs. state lawsuits during each election cycle, decide who they want to win, and rule accordingly. Sounds like a great idea, right? If every Red state sues every blue state and vice versa, we can have over a thousand lawsuits going. Cool.

Let 'em try.

 

[Port Tack]

Scotus will most likely approve the Texas case in 8-1 or 9-0 vote.

they aren't even going to vote, they will simply deny hearing the fucking stupid case.

 

[Into the Night]

On what basis? The Constitution is crystal clear that states have discretion to decide their electors. You cannot just pass a law. There would have to be a constitutional amendment.

anonymoose is correct.

The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

You are also correct.

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

 

[Port Tack]

Denial of evidence.

trump has no evidence