That's the first question I asked. How would they show they have standing?
SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
That's the first question I asked. How would they show they have standing?
If I had to come up with something I would guess if Texas voted for Trump and other states cheated Trump out of his electoral votes that damages the people of Texas by preventing them from getting their choice as president.
But that is a really lame stretch because TX voters have no right to have their choice win office. The SC gets very few cases under its original jurisdiction and I don't think this will be one of them.
This has all the makings of a story book ending. The Supremes take the case,......Ted Cruz is named to argue the case for team Trump,.....they win. In Trumps second term another leftwing justice either steps own or dies,.....trump appoints Cruz to supreme court. All over the world left wings heads literally DO explode! 
Sad that you attempt to perpetuate something you know is a lie & w/out merit.......
It was 57, so if you are going to insult someone, call them a boy, @ least get your shit together first.........
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
sad that you attempt to condone demmycrat cheating.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
yes, it wants the SC to determine if those four states violated the constitution.......
Documents for the suit can be found here..
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
Some of them are a riot to read.
From PA response -
The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and un-mistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
Some of them are a riot to read.
From PA response -
The Court should not abide this seditious abuse of the judicial process, and should send a clear and un-mistakable signal that such abuse must never be replicated
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
I would say, those four States unconstitutionally disenfranchised their own voters which affected and disenfranchised all voters in the national election.
From the GA response -
"Second, the alleged harm specific to Texas is not harm at all. Supposed dilution of Texas votes vis-à-vis the votes in other states cannot be a cognizable harm because it is baked into the Constitution. The Electoral College guarantees votes to states based on the number of their representatives and senators. See U.S. Const., art. II, § 1, cl. 2. Texas’s electoral total was not—and could not be—diminished by the electoral vote in other States. This means that Texans’ votes are always diminished compared to smaller states. As for the supposed denial of representation “in the presidency and in the senate” (Mot. for TRO 32), Texas will still have two Senators."
"Second, the alleged harm specific to Texas is not harm at all. Supposed dilution of Texas votes vis-à-vis the votes in other states cannot be a cognizable harm because it is baked into the Constitution. The Electoral College guarantees votes to states based on the number of their representatives and senators. See U.S. Const., art. II, § 1, cl. 2. Texas’s electoral total was not—and could not be—diminished by the electoral vote in other States. This means that Texans’ votes are always diminished compared to smaller states. As for the supposed denial of representation “in the presidency and in the senate” (Mot. for TRO 32), Texas will still have two Senators."
And the problem with your argument is that Texas is NOT a voter in any of the 4 states. Since Texas doesn't vote in any of those states it can not be disenfranchised from voting in any of those states. Texans were still able to vote in Texas because none of those 4 states interfered in Texas elections.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
So, Texas can not represent its voters in a national election case?
This has all the makings of a story book ending. The Supremes take the case,......Ted Cruz is named to argue the case for team Trump,.....they win. In Trumps second term another leftwing justice either steps own or dies,.....trump appoints Cruz to supreme court. All over the world left wings heads literally DO explode!
trump accused Cruz of massive voter fraud, remember?
Remember when he made Cruz mad and Cruz thought Donald lied all the time. Now, Cruz’s lips are permanently attached to Trump’s posterior.
PERFECT guy to argue in a voter fraud case then right? LOL But while were on the subject.......Do you remember when Kamala said she Believed Bidens accusers that said they were sexually harassed by him??????
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Will you STFU then?
And Texans are not allowed to vote in Georgia or Wisconsin or Pennsylvania or any other state but Texas.
As was pointed out in one of the responses, Texas will still have 2 Senators and the same number of votes in the electoral college. The fact that each Texas elector does not represent the same number of voters as other states is baked into the Constitution when small states have 3 electors. Texas voters are not harmed by how other states vote.
Georgia points out in it's response to the lawsuit that every claim alleged by Texas has already had its day in court and been thrown out. There is nothing new there and courts have already said that they would not interfere in the Georgia election and overturn it.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
You didn't answer my question.
Texas can not represent its voters in a national election case?