Right wing fuck you and your faith based

So to sum it up.

Dixie is the non christian christian theocrat.

Topspin is the anti-christian catholic.

I believe morality is mutually beneficial cooperative behavior, which doesn't rely on supernatural hokum.

Tabasco notices how stupid topspin is.
 
AssHatZombie said:
So to sum it up.

Dixie is the non christian christian theocrat.

Topspin is the anti-christian catholic.

I believe morality is mutually beneficial cooperative behavior, which doesn't rely on supernatural hokum.

Tabasco notices how stupid topspin is.
Click to expand...


No....

Dixie is a Spiritualist who respects the values of Christian faith in most cases, and isn't afraid to admit that to Atheist scum.

Topspin is a loony tune Atheist who claims he is Christian.

AsshatClown thinks 'cooperation' is 'morality' and Topspin is lost.
(one out of two ain't bad.)

And Tabasco is figuring out what to do with newly acquired Topspin ass.
 
Topspin said:
Tabasco your an insecure
Click to expand...

How in the world do you reach conclusions about one's level of confidence based on their political views? Well, your nice little assumption happens to be incorrect. My self esteem is perfect just as it is, meaning I don't dislike myself, and on the other hand, I'm not an arrogant asshole (unlike someone else in this thread, but I digress...)

Thank you for your concern anyhow.

I'm Christian but not kkk like you republicans.
Click to expand...

Actually, the KKK was founded by Democrats.

Apparently you need a brief lesson in history.

First off, the Republican Party was founded on an abolitionist platform (anti-slavery, in case your mind didn't grasp that). Under the Presidencies of Lincoln and Grant, slavery in the United States was brought to an end. The Democratic Party resisted abolition. The KKK was founded by Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Democrat.

Republicans supported the ratification of the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution. Democrats opposed both.

Moving on to the 20th century, the Republican Party fought for equal protection for black Americans. Unlike the Democrats, Republicans believe the "separate but equal" mantra doesn't cut it. Go figure. Yet, many politicians within the Democratic Party (including LBJ) resisted the civil rights movement. They battered, harassed and even lynched black Americans. They stood in the doorways at schools to bar black children from entering.

Republicans were behind the women's suffrage movement. Democrats were opposed to it.

George W. Bush appointed a greater number of minorities to cabinet positions than any other President. Now, I am by no means a fan of George W. Bush, nor of the national GOP in its present form. But surely in the race-obsessed, delusional mind of a left-wing Democrat, that must count for something.

In conclusion, the Republicans have a consistent history of supporting equal opportunity and protection under the law for all Americans, regardless of gender, race or religion. The history of Democrats, by comparison, is as shameful as it is bloody.

I don't need fucking laws to tell me what religion is good like a lot of unsuccessful fearfull republicans do.
Click to expand...

Please show me where any Republican politician has introduced legislation to tell people which religion to follow. I'd be very interested in reading about it. While you're at it, show me where I even hinted that I would support such an abomination.

Hiding under LOL I'm in the middle of the street laughing at you quivering in fear.
Click to expand...

You, sir, are an imbecile of titanic proportions.
 
I'm not into ancient History, Look at Rush's 350lb of blubber bouncing on the state cheering for the fall of the US economy at CPAC and point me out a black person in the audience.
 
I agree with you about how they go out of their way to bash Christians. They do that because they are afraid they are wrong and they think if they bash God, that christians will believe they iare right, and that will never happen. But people who bash Christians are very scared indeed, and they should be scared that they will be separated from God for eternity because of their disbelief in the Holy Father, and the only one that can :)save their souls, Christ..
 
John E.

I find it intriguing that the left continues to try to paint the Republican Party as racist. For example, Republicans have twice in a row appointed African-Americans Secretary of State. If Republicans are so racist, what would be the political advantage of naming the most diverse cabinet in history? Are you or any other leftist suddenly going to drop your Democratic Party card down the toilet, support George Bush and vote Republican? Of course not.

The notion is ridiculous, so the the remaining logical conclusion is that Republicans do not care about the color of one's skin only the ability to do the job. On the other hand, name the black cabinet members from Bubba's admin. (I'll give you a hint - they held no top post and never for very long). Why would the party most heavily supported by African Americans so completely ignore them at this level? Hmmmm...
 
The point is we have a president that is pissing off our allies! Winston Churchill fought against people like Obama. Yes we need them as allies so the people that voted in Obama need to stand up when their leader does this kind of stuff. I stood up to Bush on many issues so why cant they voice their displeasure?
 
josiemoon said:
The point is we have a president that is pissing off our allies! Winston Churchill fought against people like Obama. Yes we need them as allies so the people that voted in Obama need to stand up when their leader does this kind of stuff. I stood up to Bush on many issues so why cant they voice their displeasure?
Click to expand...
Hello, josiemoon, welcome to jpp.com! How did you find our little corner of the Internet?
 
Dixie said:
This is your opinion, and you are entitled to it in a democratic society. However, many people believe it does serve a legitimate purpose, to respect the day of Sabbath. Respecting the day of Sabbath is a fundamental part of religious exercise, and to deny a person the right to fundamentally exercise their religious belief is unconstitutional.
Click to expand...
So if you want to remember the Sabbath and keep it holy, do that shit. Leave me out of it. It's just Sunday, and before the change in the calendar it was Saturday. Comparing blue laws to murder laws is the height of ignorance.
 
Dixie said:
No....

Dixie is a Spiritualist who respects the values of Christian faith in most cases, and isn't afraid to admit that to Atheist scum.

Topspin is a loony tune Atheist who claims he is Christian.

AsshatClown thinks 'cooperation' is 'morality' and Topspin is lost.
(one out of two ain't bad.)

And Tabasco is figuring out what to do with newly acquired Topspin ass.
Click to expand...

What are your specific "spiritualist" beliefs? That's really not a sufficient descriptor of anyone's belief. It's a general category, ranging from Animism To Isis worship.
 
Usually when non-christians appreciate christianity it's for jesus's compassion, or rejection of elitism. Dixie Respects Blue Laws and The Inquisition.
 
Topspin said:
I'm not into ancient History, Look at Rush's 350lb of blubber bouncing on the state cheering for the fall of the US economy at CPAC and point me out a black person in the audience.
Click to expand...

So, rather than actually responding to what I said, you dodge the issue altogether. Classic.

You, sir, are a complete waste of my time.
 
josiemoon said:
I agree with you about how they go out of their way to bash Christians. They do that because they are afraid they are wrong and they think if they bash God, that christians will believe they iare right, and that will never happen. But people who bash Christians are very scared indeed, and they should be scared that they will be separated from God for eternity because of their disbelief in the Holy Father, and the only one that can :)save their souls, Christ..
Click to expand...

Welcome to the site. :)
 
Tabasco said:
So, rather than actually responding to what I said, you dodge the issue altogether. Classic.

You, sir, are a complete waste of my time.
Click to expand...

I know you watched your hero jumping up and down, and they did pan the crowd. Bunch of middle aged white couples. Who's not answering grand wizard?
 
Socrtease said:
So if you want to remember the Sabbath and keep it holy, do that shit. Leave me out of it. It's just Sunday, and before the change in the calendar it was Saturday. Comparing blue laws to murder laws is the height of ignorance.
Click to expand...

I agree, and if they ever try to pass a proposition to force you to observe the Sabbath, count me as in opposition to it! Comparing blue laws to any other law we have based on a moral viewpoint, is indeed valid, because that is all it is. A community or state, has the Constitutional right to determine its laws based on moral viewpoints, as long as it doesn't violate your Constitutional rights. Buying beer on Sunday is not enumerated anywhere in the Constitution.

AssHatZombie said:
What are your specific "spiritualist" beliefs? That's really not a sufficient descriptor of anyone's belief. It's a general category, ranging from Animism To Isis worship.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's pretty generic, but I have gone over my personal beliefs numerous times. I am not a member of any organized religious group, and I don't subscribe to any particular religious dogma. I don't "believe" in a God, I know something greater than self exists in our universe. It's not a "he" or "she" and it doesn't have any physical attributes. The nearest I can come to describing it to humans, is an energy source. Positive moral qualities and behaviors tend to enhance this source of energy and enrich our lives, while negative moral qualities and behaviors, tend to diminish or disrupt the energy and create turmoil. My "God" doesn't really care if you are "good" or "bad" but your place in the next realm of existence is determined by how well you perform as a positive influence on the energy source of this universe. When we pass on, our souls go to a different dimension, and it all depends on the lives we lived here, as to which direction we go. In that regard, I feel that Christianity and Judaism are conducive with the positive moral behavior required by the energy source, they define as God. The same can be said for Hinduism and Buddhism, as well as other organized religions. The basics of most organized religion are good moral values, and should be respected by all, in that context alone. It doesn't mean you have to agree with the dogma, or belong to the religion.

Is that clear enough of an explanation regarding my personal faith?
 
Dixie said:
Yes, it's pretty generic, but I have gone over my personal beliefs numerous times. I am not a member of any organized religious group, and I don't subscribe to any particular religious dogma. I don't "believe" in a God, I know something greater than self exists in our universe. It's not a "he" or "she" and it doesn't have any physical attributes. The nearest I can come to describing it to humans, is an energy source. Positive moral qualities and behaviors tend to enhance this source of energy and enrich our lives, while negative moral qualities and behaviors, tend to diminish or disrupt the energy and create turmoil. My "God" doesn't really care if you are "good" or "bad" but your place in the next realm of existence is determined by how well you perform as a positive influence on the energy source of this universe. When we pass on, our souls go to a different dimension, and it all depends on the lives we lived here, as to which direction we go. In that regard, I feel that Christianity and Judaism are conducive with the positive moral behavior required by the energy source, they define as God. The same can be said for Hinduism and Buddhism, as well as other organized religions. The basics of most organized religion are good moral values, and should be respected by all, in that context alone. It doesn't mean you have to agree with the dogma, or belong to the religion.

Is that clear enough of an explanation regarding my personal faith?
Click to expand...

What are the "good" moral values?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top