PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Red Jenkins,
That will be for the Senate to rule on.
I question whether he incited insurrection.
That will be for the Senate to rule on.
I question whether he incited insurrection.
Under English Common Law, a trial can only continue if there is a meaningful decision to be made. At first blush, this would seem to support your statement, but it goes a little deeper. The meaningful decision does not have to be the primary decision. So if someone is being tried, could be executed with their property being confiscated, and dies. The primary decision of whether to execute him has been made, but the secondary decision about confiscating property is still open.
In this case, the secondary decision over whether trump should be banned from office still has to be made.
More importantly, the Senate makes the decision of how the trial progresses, and even whether the trial progresses. The Constitution is very particular about "SOLE POWER" being vested with the Senate. This means the Supreme Court cannot review the decision.
It all falls to the Republicans to decide. If the Republicans want him tried and convicted, they can do such. If not, they have enough power to block it.
A conviction could ban him from ever going into office again, so that would be something. It is for the Senate to decide if that is a waste of taxpayer money, or not.
Are you really this clueless?
Incorrect. But I'm not surprised that you know so little
No. No they cannot
About what? Everything you stated is nonsense.Impossible to answer since you don't provide any specifics.
You're going on ignore very soon anyway. You're too stupid to take the 5 minutes necessary to check your facts before you post. Everything you've claimed in this thread is sheer stupidity, and shows that you don't belong in these big discussions.If you ever get around to letting us know why I am incorrect we will respond.
It appears you don't know why and are just trolling though.
There are quite a few post presidential perks that trump can be stripped of.Hello Walt,
It would be a waste of taxpayer money to pay a permanent salary to Trump as ex president.
Trump won't be in office by the time it goes to the Senate. How do you use a process intended to "REMOVE" someone from office when they no longer occupy it?
Come on dimwits. This isn't rocket science. The Party of the Jackass are making a mockery of the process to score political points with low information dumbasses and you tools are falling for it.![]()
There are quite a few post presidential perks that trump can be stripped of.
According to most of the 'patriots' that have been arrested, he's the reason they acted the way they did.I question whether he incited insurrection.
It's up to the new POTUS to decide the intel. Biden will def. take that away, as trump cannot be trusted not to sell top secret info to our enemies. The running joke is that it's a damned good thing that trump hasn't had any briefings in months.Hello Althea.
I wonder if ex presidents still get all the intelligence.
And do they retain a security clearance?
Yes, if so, take those things away.
You're going on ignore very soon anyway. You're too stupid to take the 5 minutes necessary to check your facts before you post. Everything you've claimed in this thread is sheer stupidity, and shows that you don't belong in these big discussions.
Who is 'we'? Are you schizophrenic?
On one level, I want trump running in 2024. he was not totally repudiated in 2020, just repudiated. I would like to see him totally repudiated. But he has a bad habit of tearing America apart, which I do not like.
So yes, I agree with Uncle, I could go either way. The Senate will work it out.
And in reality, I am saying that I want the Republicans to work it out. With only 50 seats, Democrats would need the Republicans' tacit support to get to two thirds. Maybe Republicans will just not be there to vote against it, thus tacitly supporting it. If Republicans are fine with keeping trump, I figure they get what they deserve.
Well, you are pretty stupid, so I can see why you wouldn't want to challenge me.For someone who talks so much how is it that you can't say anything.
Please put me on ignore before I catch the case of stupid that you have.
Just talking to you makes me need a shower.
I see we have another meat head , he has not gone before the senate now has he and can you impeach a private citizen .
You may be right. I almost feel sorry for him.
It doesn't matter if it started already. Much like a person dying tends to end a trial even if the indictment was already handed down, not being an elected official tends to end a Senate Trial even if the impeachment was handed down before they left office. If it didn't we'd be trying Epstein even though he was "suicided" by "somebody"...
Anyway, the requirements listed in the constitution for a trial by the Senate only apply to currently serving elected and appointed politicians and Judges.
You probably know Bob from the old days