You have no RIGHT to post on JPP, social media, or anywhere else that you did not cre

Niche Political Commentor said:
no one is claiming someone has a constitutionaol right too post on twitter, so your argument is a strawman

That doesn't mean there aren't legitimate concerns that given the marketplace of ideas is in an increasingly small number of tech monopolies, that it warrants protection. Especially considering when you go to start your own site, it'll get shut down by AWS, and if you start your own server, it'll be shut down by ICANN, etc etc
Click to expand...

ADL threatened a lawsuit within a month of me starting my new site, and it's a darkweb site. These fucking nazis aren't kidding about shutting free speech down.
 
Niche Political Commentor said:
no one is claiming someone has a constitutionaol right too post on twitter, so your argument is a strawman
Click to expand...

That, itself, is a strawman.

That doesn't mean there aren't legitimate concerns that given the marketplace of ideas is in an increasingly small number of tech monopolies, that it warrants protection. Especially considering when you go to start your own site, it'll get shut down by AWS, and if you start your own server, it'll be shut down by ICANN, etc etc
Click to expand...

Do you know how easy it is to start your own site?

As a side note: I still love your avatar.
 
This one from NPC, "That doesn't mean there aren't legitimate concerns that given the marketplace of ideas is in an increasingly small number of tech monopolies, that it warrants protection."

It's a valid address.

The voices are getting smaller and smaller.

No clue why they think we don't understand that.
 
Guille said:
How many times do you have to be told you're a fucking dumbass? You have no idea what a strawman is do you?
Click to expand...

Presenting a strawman argument to me is the same as telling me, "are you a retard?" About the same as "suggestive questions".
 
I have the right to promote that which I believe to be true....this is a fundamental right of the FreeMen.

Those who dont agree are my enemies!
 
There's currently a petition circulating to persuade Facebook not ban the term ' Zionist '. I'm in two minds, as I've always considered it a dirty word myself.
 
anatta said:
Section 230 allows this capricious banning -it has to stop -it's squashing political speech
Click to expand...

No, Section 230 has nothing to do with allowing, or disallowing banning. It is about who gets sued if someone posts something.

It is the US Constitution that allows capricious banning. It is called freedom of the press, and it allows the owner of a press (or a website) to publish (or not publish) whatever they want. They can do it for "capricious" reasons, or even just plain wrong reasons. The government does not have a say in what they publish, or do not publish.
 
Guille said:
ADL threatened a lawsuit within a month of me starting my new site, and it's a darkweb site. These fucking nazis aren't kidding about shutting free speech down.
Click to expand...

The ADL rarely has lawsuits. How would they threaten you if you had a darknet site? It would be impossible to track you down. You story does not make sense. I am calling it a lie.
 
You leftie idiots have no concept of truth. You drop in a thought connived in your head and expect your twisted reasoning to be taken seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top