Where are these domestic terrorists?

[Legion]

Probably ingesting methamphetamine at your house.

I suspected you couldn't explain, and it appears that my suspicion was justified.

 

[Legion]

Was this question too difficult?

Evidently, since an attempt was made to deflect from it.

 

[BartenderElite]

Was this question too difficult?

So, you're trying to equate protecting citizens from criminal behavior, with protecting our leaders and the seat of our government from violent overthrow?

Interesting.

Anyhoo, I asked my question first. Too difficult?

 

[Darth Omar]

So, you're trying to equate protecting citizens from criminal behavior, with protecting our leaders and the seat of our government from violent overthrow?

Interesting.

Anyhoo, I asked my question first. Too difficult?

It’s a loaded question since there was no ‘Muslim ban’. I typically ignore loaded questions.

Along the same lines, I don’t think our government was ever in danger of being ‘over thrown’ so you’ve lobbed two loaded questions in a row.

So, why are Antifa thugs allowed to terrorize diners in DC when there probably isn’t a dangerous Trump supporter within 750 miles?

 

[Legion]

I asked my question first. Too difficult?

As you've already been told, since there was no "Muslim travel ban", it's a leading question with no basis in fact, Barfly.

It also appears to be irrelevant and a pitiful attempt to deflect discussion away from current events.

 

[BartenderElite]

It’s a loaded question since there was no ‘Muslim ban’. I typically ignore loaded questions.

Along the same lines, I don’t think our government was ever in danger of being ‘over thrown’ so you’ve lobbed two loaded questions in a row.

So, why are Antifa thugs allowed to terrorize diners in DC when there probably isn’t a dangerous Trump supporter within 750 miles?

That's all I needed to know.

Thank you.

 

[Darth Omar]

Evidently, since an attempt was made to deflect from it.

I think it’s something like ‘but they are just civilians and not part of the political class’ or something like that.

 

[Legion]

I think it’s something like ‘but they are just civilians and not part of the political class’ or something like that.

Don't do their thinking for them, although they appear to be used to that.

 

[Darth Omar]

That's all I needed to know.

Thank you.

That’s your answer lol?

 

[Legion]

That's all I needed to know. Thank you.

Still no answer, Barfly?

 

[Legion]

That’s your answer lol?

It's what's called a "non-answer", lol.

 

[BartenderElite]

And my question was about "Muslim TRAVEL ban."

Which was what Trump proposed, and it was debated for weeks. If you have a thing w/ overreaction based on statistics and #'s, one would think you would have had some objection to the proposal.

 

[Legion]

And my question was about "Muslim TRAVEL ban."

Since there was no "Muslim travel ban", it's a leading question with no basis in fact, Barfly.

It also appears to be irrelevant and a pitiful attempt to deflect discussion away from current events.

 

[Darth Omar]

It would appear that Antifa gets ignored by the literal military presence in our Capitol.

Shouldn’t they be allowed to bang a few heads since they’re probably bored out of their minds waiting on the dangerous Trump terrorists to show up?

Maybe get a little practice in. I’m sure the diners would have appreciated it.

 

[Legion]

It would appear that Antifa gets ignored by the literal military presence in our Capitol.

It does.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

But where are these *alleged* domestic terrorists that are so dangerous it warrants a literal military occupation of DC? They can’t find them?

They're unlikely to try attacking Congress again so soon, but better safe than sorry. We don't even know who set them on. Trump says it wasn't him, and he never tells a lie. Could have been anybody, I guess.

Let's wait and see what the investigation comes up with, eh?

 

[Legion]

They're unlikely to try attacking Congress again so soon, but better safe than sorry.

So even though the accused perpetrators are all identified, arrested and charged, you think it's consonant with the tenets of American jurisprudence to be "better safe than sorry" by keeping a repressive military presence in our nation's capital with no other justification?

 

[Darth Omar]

They're unlikely to try attacking Congress again so soon, but better safe than sorry. We don't even know who set them on. Trump says it wasn't him, and he never tells a lie. Could have been anybody, I guess.

Let's wait and see what the investigation comes up with, eh?

I’m pretty sure *an adequately prepared* Capitol cop squad could handle it. Did the rioters have tanks that I missed in the video clips? Don’t they have something like SWAT teams that do nothing but prepare for those sorts of scenarios? Why are they chopped liver?

I’m just trying to understand the need for such a large military presence at the Capitol. And I would like to see the actual intelligence which justifies it. Though I’m sure ‘we’re not allowed’ to.

 

[AProudLefty]

Recall that when the government went after foreign terrorists on the other side of the planet they were pretty good at it. They came up with names; they knew where to find them and were able to take them out—often by remotely pressing some buttons from the Pentagon.

But where are these *alleged* domestic terrorists that are so dangerous it warrants a literal military occupation of DC? They can’t find them? Shouldn’t they, like, already know who they are and where they are at? Shouldn’t at least one or two of them be household names by now?

Inquiring minds want to know.

They are being tried as we speak.

 

[AProudLefty]

14. The treatment of Incendiary Troll accounts. Definition: Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk. Whether single or secondary, those accounts posting solely for reaction and/or harassment and not contributing to the discussion in any way post at the sole discretion of the JPP Admin Team and may be removed at any moment.