Rand Paul floats impeaching Chuck Schumer

Nice copy and paste. Now find the part about expelling other Senators. You poor dumb bastard. And there is the same amount of "proof" about incitement about what Democrats said as Trump supposedly did. In fact more.

I am curious where you think I copied that from.

The first item of proof required for incitement is that the act that was incited had to have occurred. Trump followers invaded the Capitol during an insurrection on 1/6/2021 shortly after Trump spoke. No one invaded the USSC building after Schumer spoke. There is not the same proof at all. One clearly had the incited act happen and the other had no act so there could be no incitement. The only proof you are providing is that you are as ignorant as Rand Paul.
 
"there will be blood in the streets” - Loretta Lynch
“Who says protests have to be peaceful “ - Chris Cuomo
“There needs to be unrest in the streets” - Ayanna Pressley
“Protesters should not give up” - Kamala Harris
“ I just don’t know why they aren’t uprising all over this country “ - Nancy Pelosi
“You get out and create a crowd and you push back on them, tell them they are not welcome “ Maxine W”
“Go home with love and peace, remember this day forever “ - Donald J Trump

If you go back and read all of the incitement democrats said not just the quips, there is more than enough evidence to expel all of them. Once again their stupidity will come back to shoot themselves in the foot.
 
I am curious where you think I copied that from.

The first item of proof required for incitement is that the act that was incited had to have occurred. Trump followers invaded the Capitol during an insurrection on 1/6/2021 shortly after Trump spoke. No one invaded the USSC building after Schumer spoke. There is not the same proof at all. One clearly had the incited act happen and the other had no act so there could be no incitement. The only proof you are providing is that you are as ignorant as Rand Paul.

Obviously someplace. You sure a hell do not know that off the top of your head. As to the rest of your drivel, all of those comments made by democrats incited all the rioting in this country last summer. And it all started long before that.
 
Tell dumbshit Sailor that the paraphrase content was not nearly as incendiary in substance, wasn't to an existing /present mob, didn't request overthrow of the US government, and never caused anything to happen.

What a human turd. :palm:

Micabwer. You really can stop trying to act like a lawyer. It is quite apparent that you are at best some coffee bitch at an office. Maybe.
 
Obviously someplace. You sure a hell do not know that off the top of your head. As to the rest of your drivel, all of those comments made by democrats incited all the rioting in this country last summer. And it all started long before that.

I know that from years of study and research. What is your excuse for not being informed?
 
No one invaded the USSC building after Schumer spoke.

No, they stormed Capitol Hill.


In a full-day of demonstrations on Capitol Hill, hundreds of mostly women protesters raised fists and shouted "Lock Him Up" in front of the Supreme Court, unfurled banners inside a Senate office building and even blocked a Senate elevator door to directly confront Sen. Jeff Flake on live TV.

Over at the Hart Senate Office building, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, her voice choked with tears, gave a fiery speech to protesters, charging that the Republican-dominated committee's push to confirm Kavanaugh quickly represented a "fundamental disrespect of women."

“This is 11 men deciding that women have no right to be treated with respect, and we say, 'Rise up, women!' " she said.

Jayapal, a DEMOCRAT congresswoman from Washington state, pointed to the political energy unleashed by the movement, led by women, against Kavanaugh.

“We know that strength emerges in times of crisis,” she said. “So, let it roar forward like a volcano.”

Darius Gordon, a National field organizer for the Center for Popular Democracy, said Friday's arrests send an important message – that "folks are not just willing to lay down and let things go smoothly." Rachel Egan, another protester, agreed. She said “It generally occurs when people feel that there is no other recourse to shine a light on injustice.”

Angry protesters marched and shouted in, around and through the marbled buildings that dot Capitol Hill even as members of the Senate Judiciary were gingerly advancing the controversial nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the full Senate for a vote next week.

Arrests were plentiful. Some for blocking hallways, others for unfurling banners reading "Withdraw Kavanaugh. No Abusees on the Supreme Court" from the upper floors of the Hart Senate Office Building.

e1d4d509-2a68-4a57-ae09-725cbdf48b05-XXX__JG_137505_Kavanaugh_Protes_9_28_jmg_21236.JPG



today.com/story/news/2018/09/28/brett-kavanaugh-hearing-protesters-christine-blasey-ford/1453524002/
 
"there will be blood in the streets” - Loretta Lynch
“Who says protests have to be peaceful “ - Chris Cuomo
“There needs to be unrest in the streets” - Ayanna Pressley
“Protesters should not give up” - Kamala Harris
“ I just don’t know why they aren’t uprising all over this country “ - Nancy Pelosi
“You get out and create a crowd and you push back on them, tell them they are not welcome “ Maxine W”
“Go home with love and peace, remember this day forever “ - Donald J Trump

you are such a dumbass. kamala harris is right, protesters should not give up. nothing to do with violence. pelosi is right, people should rise up when cops shoot unarmed people and pay no price. and unrest. there was blood in the streets, that retarded gun nut bitch Kyle in Minnesota shot two unarmed guys to death with his assault weapon.

and here is what Maxine Waters said about confronting people who worked directly for Trump after he changed policy to separate kids from their parents for no good reason-

 
He even walked all his comments back. Hence the reason SCJ Roberts said something about it. STFU and begone.

It's not a serious argument. Just chum. There won't be an impeachment about anything Schumer said to anyone, ever.
You must like losing. :palm:

And PS if you walk a comment back, that's not a bad thing. Duh. Trump is remorseless and shameless. And that's why he is gone.
 
It's not a serious argument. Just chum. There won't be an impeachment about anything Schumer said to anyone, ever.
You must like losing. :palm:

And PS if you walk a comment back, that's not a bad thing. Duh. Trump is remorseless and shameless. And that's why he is gone.

Poor Micawber. So wrong all the time.
 
The question concerning when words are illegal or simply free speech could be an interesting discussion between intelligent people, but
not here, and no light is shed at all based on Paul's poor comparison.
 
“The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.” Holmes
 
The question concerning when words are illegal or simply free speech could be an interesting discussion between intelligent people, but
not here, and no light is shed at all based on Paul's poor comparison.

Every time you post you remind of a drug addicted "seer" on the street corner talking to himself.
 
If you go back and read all of the incitement democrats said not just the quips, there is more than enough evidence to expel all of them. Once again their stupidity will come back to shoot themselves in the foot.

True. They really MEAN it when they say it. The problem is they are provided lots of cover for their deeds from the swamp,
media and tech underworlds. We'll see if anything sticks this time.
 
Back
Top