Somali pirates vow revenge over comrades' killings

signalmankenneth

Verified User
By Abdiqani Hassan

BOSASSO, Somalia, April 12 (Reuters) - Somali pirates threatened revenge on Sunday after two separate hostage-rescue raids by foreign forces killed at least five comrades, raising fears of future bloodshed on the high seas.

The latest raid by U.S. forces on Sunday that saved an American hostage and one by France last week have upped the stakes in shipping lanes off the anarchic Horn of Africa nation where buccaneers have defied foreign naval patrols.

"The French and the Americans will regret starting this killing. We do not kill, but take only ransom. We shall do something to anyone we see as French or American from now," Hussein, a pirate, told Reuters by satellite phone.

"We cannot know how or whether our friends on the lifeboat died, but this will not stop us from hijacking," he said.

Sea gangs generally treat their captives well, hoping to fetch top dollar in ransoms.

The worst violence has been an occasional beating.

"We shall revenge," said another pirate, Aden, in Eyl village, a pirate lair on Somalia's eastern coast.

Some fear the U.S. and French operations may make the modern-day pirates more like their more fearsome forbearers.

"The pirates will know from now that anything can happen. The French are doing this, the Americans are doing it. Things will be more violent from now on," said Andrew Mwangura of the Kenya-based East African Seafarers Assistance Programme.

"This is a big wake-up to the pirates. It raises the stakes."



PIRACY ESCALATION

Piracy is lucrative business in Somalia, where gangs have earned millions of dollars in ransoms, splashing it on wives, houses, cars and fancy goods.

After a wane in business early this year, pirates have struck back. They presently hold more than a dozen vessels with about 260 hostages, of whom about 100 are Filipino.

Eyl, Haradheere and other pirate havens along the Indian Ocean coastline have come back to life with the windfall of successful operations.

Somalia's anarchy -- whose 18 years of civil war have given sea gangs assault rifles, grenade launchers and little central control -- has long been ignored by world powers.

The saga over the capture of cargo ship captain Richard Phillips has thrown international attention on the long-running piracy phenomenon that has hiked up insurance costs on strategic waterways where warships now patrol.

"Killing three out of thousands of pirates will only escalate piracy," said Sheikh Abdullahi Sheikh Abu Yusuf, spokesman of the moderate Islamist group Ahlu Sunna Waljamaca. (Additional reporting by Andrew Cawthorne in Nairobi and Abdi Sheikh and Abdi Guled in Mogadishu; Writing by Jack Kimball; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne and Jon Boyle)



signal comment: The shipping companies may want to start arming their ships!
 
Empty threats. We stood up to the bully and he's pissing his pants, crying and threatening revenge. :tantrum:
 
I think you are right, Damo.

And I can't see us being particularly worried about revenge from Somali pirates.
 
I think you are right, Damo.

And I can't see us being particularly worried about revenge from Somali pirates.

.. and the world then gets to dump all its toxic waste in Africa .. killing off everything in its wake

Amazing how that works.

The more western influence, the more things die.

Like a plaugue or a virus.

It's the same scourge the American Indian faced. The more the invaders came, the more things died. Buffalo would disappear and the human plaugue would consume the American Indian.
 
.. and the world then gets to dump all its toxic waste in Africa .. killing off everything in its wake

Amazing how that works.

The more western influence, the more things die.

Like a plaugue or a virus.

It's the same scourge the American Indian faced. The more the invaders came, the more things died. Buffalo would disappear and the human plaugue would consume the American Indian.

?????

wow... so what exactly are you trying to say here? That we should allow the ships to continue getting hijacked, because if we don't toxic waste will be dumped in Africa?

Sorry if that is not what you meant, but I am clearly missing your point.
 
?????

wow... so what exactly are you trying to say here? That we should allow the ships to continue getting hijacked, because if we don't toxic waste will be dumped in Africa?

Sorry if that is not what you meant, but I am clearly missing your point.
I guess he thinks the US should gain sovereignty over Somalia so we can stop toxic dumping on their shores. Either that or we should give up our lifestyle so other people will quit polluting their own shores. I'm not quite sure what the aim is here.
 
I don't know why you can't have safe shipping lanes and reduction of toxic waste. It is not that Somalia allows it, it is that ships know they can dump their waste there and get away with it.

When I worked on barges in the US, my company used to navigate the inland waterways. West of Baton Rouge there is a place where the Atchafalaya River intersects the IWW on its way out to the gulf of Mexico. Towboats that navigated that area of the IWW at night would wait till they were right in the middle of the Atchafalaya intersection and dump their garbage for the last 2 weeks or so and by morning it would be in the gulf because the current was so strong. Boats knew that no one would catch them. Boats also pumped their bilges dry, not only of water but of oil and other shit. Because they knew that by morning the spill would be so far away that no one would catch it. Somalia is that place for the Indian Ocean. But you can take care of both problems, but if you did that the evil shipping companies would make more profit and I guess that is a bad thing.
 
You see, violence is never the answer! We should have just said "fuck the prisoner!!" and left well enough alone. Now there is a cycle of violence!!

And if we wage war, that compfy house awaiting BAC in Somalia will be destroyed, and he'll be stuck living in this shithole country instead!!!!!
 
Back
Top