nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples

blackascoal said:
I've already produced demonstrations of thermite reactions that very clearly produce white smoke .. and the dripping molten metal it produces.

The color of the smoke is no longer a valid argument for your position my brother.

Additionally, I'm still waiting for you to tell me why thermite was present in all three buildings when it shouldn't have been present in any of them? If it wasn't used, why was it there.

Additionally, please explain what else produces the hot spots that kept the area 500 degrees hotter than fire for weeks? If it wasn't thermite, what was it?

Additionally, please explain how terrorists could penetrate the best security aparatus in the world and sneak into the towers to plant whatever it is you think brought down the towers. How is that possible when the head of security believes an attack is imminent and who also happened to be the top counterterrorism expert in the FBI who resigned because the administration was giving his dire warnings the short=end?

And given the list of tenants in the building, how is sneaking in and planting whatever in strategic areas that would bring down giant buildings even possible?
Click to expand...
You gave me pictures of the WTC towers that were not in such a reaction. I have produced pictures, and SF as well, that shows the distinctive colored smoke of a thermite reaction. I have seen them, I produced the pictures, and I have backed up what I am saying here. It takes desperation to ignore such evidence for evidence produces from sites with an agenda. Thermite reactions have a distinctive appearance, and it would be noticeable.

Again, this wouldn't prove that nothing was there to take down the buildings, only that it wasn't thermite. It simply is not in evidence.
 
Damocles said:
You gave me pictures of the WTC towers that were not in such a reaction. I have produced pictures, and SF as well, that shows the distinctive colored smoke of a thermite reaction. I have seen them, I produced the pictures, and I have backed up what I am saying here. It takes desperation to ignore such evidence for evidence produces from sites with an agenda. Thermite reactions have a distinctive appearance, and it would be noticeable.

Again, this wouldn't prove that nothing was there to take down the buildings, only that it wasn't thermite. It simply is not in evidence.
Click to expand...

Did you not see the videos of thermite producing white smoke?

What kind of "desperation" does it take to ignore what is clearly on the videos.

Can thermite produce white and yellow smoke? Perhaps?

But to claim your evidence is any more valid than what is clearly visible in my evidence is again, disingenuous.

AND, and, and, and .. you keep running from the questions I've respectfully asked you repeatedly.

I've not run from one single question asked by anybody on this issue.

When it gets down to facts, not hyperbole, it becomes very clear that 9/11 was a fraud froim the very beginning.
 
blackascoal said:
Did you not see the videos of thermite producing white smoke?

What kind of "desperation" does it take to ignore what is clearly on the videos.

Can thermite produce white and yellow smoke? Perhaps?

But to claim your evidence is any more valid than what is clearly visible in my evidence is again, disingenuous.

AND, and, and, and .. you keep running from the questions I've respectfully asked you repeatedly.

I've not run from one single question asked by anybody on this issue.

When it gets down to facts, not hyperbole, it becomes very clear that 9/11 was a fraud froim the very beginning.
Click to expand...
The only reason I claim that is because my evidence doesn't come from sites with an agenda, and direct knowledge.

Again, the pictures are real, the knowledge is real, the reality is there. If something was used to take down the buildings it was not thermite.

Other than that, I have just more evidence of the very real statement I made earlier and know that it is worthless to point out things to people who want to believe something so bad that they won't even recognize something like this.

And one more time. There may have been something used, it just wasn't this. This would be obvious, and it would have been a smoking gun. If they used something, it just wasn't thermite.
 
Damocles said:
The only reason I claim that is because my evidence doesn't come from sites with an agenda, and direct knowledge.

Again, the pictures are real, the knowledge is real, the reality is there. If something was used to take down the buildings it was not thermite.

Other than that, I have just more evidence of the very real statement I made earlier.
Click to expand...

What "agenda" does ComputerWorld have?

Obviously you didn't even look at the videos.

I'll continue to ask .. if thermite didn't bring the towers down what did?

How could terrorists have penetrated the security I've repeastedly mentioned?

WHY WAS THERMITE EVEN PRESENT IN THE BUILDINGS WHEN IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN?

Why did the site remain so hot for so long .. with longer lasting structural fires than any time in history? Does relatively small fires do that?

What does that?

Feel free to run .. I'll just keep asking.
 
blackascoal said:
What "agenda" does ComputerWorld have?

Obviously you didn't even look at the videos.

I'll continue to ask .. if thermite didn't bring the towers down what did?

How could terrorists have penetrated the security I've repeastedly mentioned?

WHY WAS THERMITE EVEN PRESENT IN THE BUILDINGS WHEN IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN?

Why did the site remain so hot for so long .. with longer lasting structural fires than any time in history? Does relatively small fires do that?

What does that?

Feel free to run .. I'll just keep asking.
Click to expand...
Again, I stated that I didn't know, but it could have been even directed explosions. I believe that the government covered up such evidence in order to cover their own asses as I explained before. But heck, I'll have to keep repeating and repeating because you never hear anything if it doesn't fit in with what you have already decided happened.

The only thing that I do know, is that it wasn't thermite because I know what it looks like and it would have been obvious.
 
Damocles said:
Again, I stated that I didn't know, but it could have been even directed explosions. I believe that the government covered up such evidence in order to cover their own asses as I explained before. But heck, I'll have to keep repeating and repeating because you never hear anything if it doesn't fit in with what you have already decided happened.

The only thing that I do know, is that it wasn't thermite because I know what it looks like and it would have been obvious.
Click to expand...

I know how intelligent debate works. You ask a question, I answer .. I ask a question, you answer. You seem to have a problem with that concept.

The questions I asked go to the very heart of what it is you claim to believe .. but you can't answer, don't have a clue.

Don't know why thermite was there.

Don't know of anything that could leave the same footprints as thermite.

Don't know how it would even be possible for terrorists to penetrate what would had to have been TREMENDOUS security to strategically plant whatever.

As you say, you don't know.
 
blackascoal said:
I know how intelligent debate works. You ask a question, I answer .. I ask a question, you answer. You seem to have a problem with that concept.

The questions I asked go to the very heart of what it is you claim to believe .. but you can't answer, don't have a clue.

Don't know why thermite was there.

Don't know of anything that could leave the same footprints as thermite.

Don't know how it would even be possible for terrorists to penetrate what would had to have been TREMENDOUS security to strategically plant whatever.

As you say, you don't know.
Click to expand...
And as I say, you think you know much, but much of what you know is simply colored by the tint of your thought.

It's all good. I can't believe I let myself be drawn into this with you again. Enjoy the discussion. I think it will be as fruitless for you as you make it.
 
Damocles said:
And as I say, you think you know much, but much of what you know is simply colored by the tint of your thought.

It's all good. I can't believe I let myself be drawn into this with you again. Enjoy the discussion. I think it will be as fruitless for you as you make it.
Click to expand...

... you say as you wimp your way out the door.

There was nothing disrespectful about the questions I civily asked you. You simply couldn't answer .. seemingly neither could AHZ .. so now you want to take your marbles and go home.

This discussion ends as it always does .. with you wimping out.
 
Topspin said:
it's insanely funny that 911 was a fraud, this is better than the comedy channel. Thanks BAC
Click to expand...

... you say as you offer NOTHING to the conversation .. already knowing you have NOTHING to add.

It is indeed insanely funny how powerful an emotion cognitive dissonace truly is.

Funny and tragic.
 
blackascoal said:
... you say as you wimp your way out the door.

There was nothing disrespectful about the questions I civily asked you. You simply couldn't answer .. seemingly neither could AHZ .. so now you want to take your marbles and go home.

This discussion ends as it always does .. with you wimping out.
Click to expand...
It ends as it always has, with me stopping the endless repeat and rehash cycle. The questions were answered, multiple times in different ways with different sources and all I ever get for my trouble is your endless memory lapse and the question asked again with the same video. We can talk about it endlessly, but nothing changes.

As I said, it's all good. You will get as much from the conversation as you want.
 
Damocles said:
It ends as it always has, with me stopping the endless repeat and rehash cycle.
Click to expand...

It ends with you running sir.

It ends with you running out of argument, not even able to support your own theory.

I'm cool with that.

I already knew that's how it would end.
 
blackascoal said:
It ends with you running sir.

It ends with you running out of argument, not even able to support your own theory.

I'm cool with that.

I already knew that's how it would end.
Click to expand...
And again, it ends with the endless repeat and rehash, even with this. Your schtick on this subject is always the same. You ask a question. I (or in this thread SF and others as I have largely kept my promise to stay out of the conversation) research and find links that refute what you lead into with your question. You then say that nobody answered your question and post it again, then again (often with different sources as well as the same) it is refuted and answered. You then ask again....

It goes round and round and is pointless.

I fully expect you to repeat the worthless "running away" stuff, it's as pointless as the whole of this thread has been, a microcosm if you will.

Then when somebody comes in and posts stuff that refutes what you claim you know to be true, you will again post the same thing and accuse them of not answering questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top