Dark day for SCOTUS

Darth Omar said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1363859147129839620

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.
Click to expand...

Not unexpected- courts do that all the time. "What do you expect us to do, overturn an election?" Judges at every level leave their balls at home.

Now we get to sit back and read all the bullshit from the libs here about how Trump was 'laughed out of court" or similar.
 
China Joe said:
Not unexpected- courts do that all the time. "What do you expect us to do, overturn an election?" Judges at every level leave their balls at home.

Now we get to sit back and read all the bullshit from the libs here about how Trump was 'laughed out of court" or similar.
Click to expand...

Wouldn’t even look at the evidence because it’s ‘moot’.

Thomas wrote a good dissent about how the court refusing to intervene will come back and haunt the country in future elections.
 
Darth Omar said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1363859147129839620

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.
Click to expand...

Are you aware that the case was asking the Court on behalf of the Pennsylvania Legislature to declare unconstitutional the mail in ballot rules that the very same Pennsylvania Legislature approved and passed something like six months earlier? The Court should have thrown the case out even before it reached a hearing consideration, it was inane

And they actually did Trump a favor by not ruling on his tax case until now, it was the second go around for the same case and they delayed any ruling till after the election
 
These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. [Clarence Thomas dissent]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022221zor_2cp3.pdf
 
Legion said:
Right now, DEMOCRATS are passing what they euphemistically call a "rights" bill to make sure that their Party can never lose another election.

Then there's this:

Biden’s commission on court reform is likely to recommend sweeping changes to the judiciary system, including an expansion of lower courts.

The commission, which Biden announced on the campaign trail, came after activists pressured him to dilute the influence former President Donald Trump exerted on the courts through judicial nominations.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-commission-court-expansion-term-limits

They are also looking at retroactive term limits to remove judges appointed by Trump.
Click to expand...

Today I have seen you link Townhall and Washington Examiner. Do you have any concept at all of how fucking brainwashed you are?
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Even IF all the mail-in votes that arrived after the election were fraudulent votes for Biden (and nobody has ever tried to establish that afaik), it STILL wouldn't overturn Biden's victory margin of more than 80,000 votes. “A decision would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election,” Justice Alito wrote.

I don't believe Trump was expecting to overturn the election result, in this or any of his other lawsuits. He's not that much of a fool. He wanted to make enough "noise" so that his followers could say he was robbed. And here they are - doing it.
Click to expand...

They're also sending their unemployment checks to Trump's "legal fund".
 
Darth Omar said:
Wouldn’t even look at the evidence because it’s ‘moot’.

Thomas wrote a good dissent about how the court refusing to intervene will come back and haunt the country in future elections.
Click to expand...


Thomas is obsolete and irrelevant. He's just throwing a hissy fit because it makes his fat, white wife wet.
 
Legion said:
Are you proud of your reading skills? Want a gold star?
Click to expand...

I'm just pointing out that you are a brain dead piece of shit who thinks that the National Enquirer and Entertainment Tonight are news sources. You are the worst representative of humanity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top