nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples

I said that the detected materials in the dust that "Dr." Jones says were what made up the thermite were common in buildings in every city and were found in amounts that were not above the norm according to the very same reports that "Dr." Jones uses.

I did not say the universe is made of thermite, that is a retarded straw man. If this is the "best" of your thinking abilities, I can't believe you can dress yourself.

Right. In other words, the universe is made of thermite.
 
Right. That's what it was, a secret conspiracy against you.

If you go up, you will see where I quoted the portions of my statements in later posts with the parts about which you were asking. But heck, actually reading what I write isn't one of your strong suits.

Dude. You were modifying your posts and adding stuff and then pretending I was ignoring it. This is a new low for you, liar.
 
Dude. You were modifying your posts and adding stuff and then pretending I was ignoring it. This is a new low for you, liar.
Rubbish. Everybody knows that I edit posts sometimes. I pointed out to you several times that I had, and even quoted the damned posts. You then pretended that the answers didn't exist even several posts afterward.
 
Pathetic. You have no integrity.
Says the man who went past quotes of the posts then continued to state that nothing was said on the subject.

You are taking this way too seriously, however I'm not going to let you get away with revisionist history when people can go back up and see that what I am saying is true.
 
Says the man who went past quotes of the posts then continued to state that nothing was said on the subject.

You are taking this way too seriously, however I'm not going to let you get away with revisionist history when people can go back up and see that what I am saying is true.

You edited the shit, you lying sack.
 
Whatever, hack.
LOL. I have direct evidence otherwise, you have... Well. nothing but silly ad homs.

What is hacktacular is several times passing the posts getting more and more excited about how I had "never answered" even after I had quoted the post and said, "read that post again" pointing out that I had changed it a bit (as I am wont to do on occasion.)

I do edit posts sometimes, but when I realize it is causing problems because people are answering before reading I'll usually point it out by quoting the changes, as I did above, even linking to the post where I did.

You can attempt to "redeem" yourself in this thread by trying to attack me this way, but the evidence is just mere posts above, it is clear, and it is obvious.
 
Anyway, because I believe that government employees covered up lines of investigation and therefore think we'll never know the entire story I therefore also believe that such lines were covered up and thus hard to delineate with certainty.

I asked specific questions I have above, but then again you don't actually read anything I actually type, you just keep spouting retarded straw men about "everything being covered with faerie dust".

"Hard to delineate with certainty"

Translation: It's my catch all bullshit line which I will keep vague so I can throw it out whenever..
 
"Hard to delineate with certainty"

Translation: It's my catch all bullshit line which I will keep vague so I can throw it out whenever..
Translation: You aren't paranoid enough to believe whatever I tell you, therefore you can't possibly have an opinion based on the past performance of the government in any way shape or form. You must be "this credulous" to ride this ride and no amount of evidence discrediting what I believe in could possibly change my mind.
 
Translation: You aren't paranoid enough to believe whatever I tell you, therefore you can't possibly have an opinion based on the past performance of the government.

I don't tell you what to believe. I asked why you believe what you believe, and received vagueness and bullshit.
 
I don't tell you what to believe. I asked why you believe what you believe, and received vagueness and bullshit.
I'm not some replacement for Dr. Jones in your life, I know I'm not pointing out inanities that are easily discredited therefore I must be somehow lacking in your sight.

I'm not here to make crap up, or present "evidence" that has been discredited and found lacking in order to make you feel better about the fact that thermite wasn't used to take down those buildings.

Now that we know that it wasn't thermite, what do you think it might have been?
 
You explain it. I've no reason to. Nano thermite is bogus. Just google it, all you get are a bunch of conspiracy sites. I can't find anything legit on "nano" thermite at all. If all you mean is extra small dust, that's you'd expect from a falling sky scraper. As far as putting "nano" in front of a compound that is simply metal dust, it's a ploy to make it sound more scientific then it is.

LOL
what a dipshit.
Yeah, all they did was say some dust was extra small!
You are a fucking idiot!
 
I'm not some replacement for Dr. Jones in your life, I know I'm not pointing out inanities that are easily discredited therefore I must be somehow lacking in your sight.

I'm not here to make crap up, or present "evidence" that has been discredited and found lacking in order to make you feel better about the fact that thermite wasn't used to take down those buildings.

Now that we know that it wasn't thermite, what do you think it might have been?

Well, since we know thermite is so ubiquitous and forms from welding tools, and rusty cars, it's possible the "real thermite" is just in amongst the thermite that is sprinkled around civilization like pixie dust, as you assert.

Do you still believe it might have been terrorists that planted the thermite that "doesn't exist". Oh wait. That's just another piece of bullshit you throw out when you feel cornered.
 
Well, since we know thermite is so ubiquitous and forms from welding tools, and rusty cars, it's possible the "real thermite" is just in amongst the thermite that is sprinkled around civilization like pixie dust, as you assert.

Do you still believe it might have been terrorists that planted the thermite that "doesn't exist". Oh wait. That's just another piece of bullshit you throw out when you feel cornered.
Rubbish, again, thermite usage leaves traces that are unmistakable and would be impossible to hide, there would be hours and hours of footage showing not tiny traces but the very real traces that thermite produces.

It wasn't thermite because the evidence doesn't point that way.

Again, now that we know it wasn't thermite, AND that you haven't read the thread or any of the links provided, AND that you just ignore whatever it is that you want to in order to continue to repeat inanities in perpetuity, we can therefore come to the conclusion, with the evidence on hand, that you are not an educated authority on this topic and refuse to become one.

Again, thanks for playing, but you have become almost clownish in your aspect in this thread.
 
Rubbish, again, thermite usage leaves traces that are unmistakable and would be impossible to hide, there would be hours and hours of footage showing not tiny traces but the very real traces that thermite produces.

It wasn't thermite because the evidence doesn't point that way.

Again, now that we know it wasn't thermite, AND that you haven't read the thread or any of the links provided, AND that you just ignore whatever it is that you want to in order to continue to repeat inanities in perpetuity, we can therefore come to the conclusion, with the evidence on hand, that you are not an educated authority on this topic and refuse to become one.

Again, thanks for playing, but you have become almost clownish in your aspect in this thread.

So you're off the "thermite components are all over" theory? Here's my oversized shoe in your behind, cretin.
 
Back
Top