HAHAHA. Case against Chauvin so weak prosecutor brings in George Floyd daughter

[moon]

Like the jurors they are being intimidated by the fake news press. Everybody knows if they defend chauvin, the press will destroy them.

His senior officers and his department condemn his actions. They're under oath. Do you comprehend what that means ?

 

[moon]

 

[Wolverine]

You are simpler than addition. This was never about one guy. Open your fucking eyes.

Fucking white people. I swear.

It is about a false Premise how do you know I am white, racist!

 

[Wolverine]

You are simpler than addition. This was never about one guy. Open your fucking eyes.

Fucking white people. I swear.

It is about a false Premise how do you know I am white, racist!
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017...-black-men-rare-heres-what-data-actually-say/

 

[Diesel]

His superiors and his department state otherwise, under oath. You're a loser- like Chauvin.

TDAK is not only a loser. He literally thinks that there is "nothing wrong" (his words) with murder.

 

[Diesel]

It is about a false Premise how do you know I am white, racist!

I've been dealing with you people for most of my life. I don't need to see your picture to know you're white.

 

[LV426]

Like the jurors they are being intimidated by the fake news press. Everybody knows if they defend chauvin, the press will destroy them.

We are watching the same trial the jurors are, so there's no intimidation happening.

Along what terms are you defending Chauvin?

Do you not think he killed Floyd?

If not, then would you volunteer to let me kneel on your neck for nine minutes in order to prove what Chauvin did was harmless?

 

[LV426]

You'll probably get your wish due to media intimidation of the jury.

How is the media intimidating the jury when we're all watching the same trial as the jurors in real time?

 

[LV426]

Fact remains that chauvin did nothing wrong.

That's not what his boss or the department rep have said under oath.

 

[moon]

TDAK is not only a loser. He literally thinks that there is "nothing wrong" (his words) with murder.

He's also a bored, contrary, attention-seeking dumbass.

 

[Wolverine]

I've been dealing with you people for most of my life. I don't need to see your picture to know you're white.

You people? Kind of hard to call someone else racist when you are isn't it? I mean seriously you have bought into the whole victim mentality. I hate no one, I dislike no one based on skin color, arseholes come in all shapes, sizes and colors get over your hate, get over yourself!

 

[Wolverine]

That's not what his boss or the department rep have said under oath.

Of course not, they do not want a repeat of the rioting, burning, assaults, and looting, it's why they will find him guilty! It sets a really bad precedent.

 

[moon]

Of course not, they do not want a repeat of the rioting, burning, assaults, and looting, it's why they will find him guilty! It sets a really bad precedent.

' Precedent ' ? Do you think that there have been no cases of innocent black defendants found ' guilty' with a mob of armed whites outside the courtroom ?

 

[Diesel]

You people? Kind of hard to call someone else racist when you are isn't it? I mean seriously you have bought into the whole victim mentality. I hate no one, I dislike no one based on skin color, arseholes come in all shapes, sizes and colors get over your hate, get over yourself!

Yet you support a white cop murdering a black man for no good reason.

Next.

 

[Wolverine]

' Precedent ' ? Do you think that there have been no cases of innocent black defendants found ' guilty' with a mob of armed whites outside the courtroom ?

Not recently you maroon!

 

[Wolverine]

Yet you support a white cop murdering a black man for no good reason.

Next.

I support nothing of the sort!

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017...-black-men-rare-heres-what-data-actually-say/

 

[moon]

Not recently you maroon!

So how does the Federal Statute of Limitations address ' precedent ' numbnut.


Haw, haw.........................haw.