Another gun nut looking to waste some people

If the guy came back and pumped 5 more bullets into an unconscious kid, then he's not defensible. If the kid was still fucking with him, different story.

Self defense is different than being given carte blanche to kill anyone and everything once the situation is safe.

Grind. Stop it.

as I said, I don't agree with pumping the kid full of lead. However many of us have never been in that situation before. I cannot imagine with the adrenaline, the fight or flight kicking in your brain, the fear, the nerves, how rattled one is, you just loose cognition. chances are you don't act rationally. Temporary insanity if you will. This man did not bring this situation upon himself. I don't feel he is a future threat to society, and I don't think he deserves to be in jail.
 
Grind is the only one I see talking about the entire situation. This guy was not some loose cannon waiting for the chance to shoot someone. He was a guy who was attacked by armed thugs who would have killed him in a NY minute. I am not justifying his shooting the man when he was down but since I have not been in the situation I can't condemn him either.
 
are you freaking kidding me, I'm the most lib-tard anti gun liberal here.
He should have pumped 10 rounds into the kid.
Please, this is worse than peta claming the dog show needs to be stopped because of owners seeking a master race. You make your cause a joke.
 
are you freaking kidding me, I'm the most lib-tard anti gun liberal here.
He should have pumped 10 rounds into the kid.
Please, this is worse than peta claming the dog show needs to be stopped because of owners seeking a master race. You make your cause a joke.
LOL You must be yanking mine. The purpose of having a gun for personal defense is to stop the attacker, not to kill him, but if he dies the so be it. In this case the attacker was stopped, at least long enough for the defender to chase after the other attackers. If he had shot at the others running away from him he'd have committed another crime.
 
I hope they convict this SOB gun nut, shooting someones unconcious body five time makes not sense! The sad part is, if this happen in Texas, he would have not be charged with a crime?! Some people don't need to own guns, it's scary to think, you got assholes like this walking the streets with guns!

While I agree that this guy's actions are not defensible if the teenager was indeed unconscious, I wonder... what is it about this situation that makes the clerk a 'gun nut'?

Another factor to keep in mind, flashing a gun at someone who has been in war, probably not a positive on their psyche. This does not justify his actions, but should be considered.
 
I hope they convict this SOB gun nut, shooting someones unconcious body five time makes not sense! The sad part is, if this happen in Texas, he would have not be charged with a crime?! Some people don't need to own guns, it's scary to think, you got assholes like this walking the streets with guns!

what kind of stupid do you subscribe to? you're all angry because you think the pharmacist is a gun nut, yet you totally ignore WHY he had to shoot. WTF is wrong with your thinking?
 
that's what I'm saying,
you put a gun in somebody's face and you lose all rights to protection period.
 
that's what I'm saying,
you put a gun in somebody's face and you lose all rights to protection period.
Not quite. What you essentially have done is given someone else the right to use extreme force, potentially deadly, to stop you. Do you understand the difference or do I have to explain in greater detail?
 
If the guy came back and pumped 5 more bullets into an unconscious kid, then he's not defensible. If the kid was still fucking with him, different story.

Self defense is different than being given carte blanche to kill anyone and everything once the situation is safe.

Grind. Stop it.

I read a better article that said the video revealed not only was the kid still moving around, but the other perp was still shooting at the shop owner.

Fuck watertard and the rest of you scum. You idiots are always second guessing based on too little information. Idiots and kneejerk reactionaries..all of you
 
I read a better article that said the video revealed not only was the kid still moving around, but the other perp was still shooting at the shop owner.

Fuck watertard and the rest of you scum. You idiots are always second guessing based on too little information. Idiots and kneejerk reactionaries..all of you
Sure I'm speculating. That's all I can do with a press corp that refuses to report the truth. *shrug*
 
LOL You must be yanking mine. The purpose of having a gun for personal defense is to stop the attacker, not to kill him, but if he dies the so be it. In this case the attacker was stopped, at least long enough for the defender to chase after the other attackers. If he had shot at the others running away from him he'd have committed another crime.

I agree that if the attacker was stopped he should not have shot him again unless there was reason to feel threatened by him.

But I disagree with your statement that the gun is to stop the attacker not to kill him. Its called Deadly Force for a good reason. You aim for center of body mass and keep shooting until he falls or you run out of ammo. You do not try to wound the attacker.
 
I agree that if the attacker was stopped he should not have shot him again unless there was reason to feel threatened by him.

But I disagree with your statement that the gun is to stop the attacker not to kill him. Its called Deadly Force for a good reason. You aim for center of body mass and keep shooting until he falls or you run out of ammo. You do not try to wound the attacker.
You aim for the center of the torso because that's a big target and can't move out of the way as fast as a head, limb or ass. And as I said before, if the attacker dies then so be it.

Interesting that the ultimate target for a trained sniper is to shoot the guy's balls off.
 
Back
Top