Corrupt, partisan NSA caught spying to leak Tucker Carlson messages, to silence him

Arminius said:


Every fake story you fell for from the last four years...based on anonymous sources. You were still fine with that practice...until just now. :laugh:

200w.webp
Click to expand...

The republicans told you Osama bin Ladin was no threat under Clinton


They said that bombing Iraq’s WMDS was fake

They told there was no threat until we got 911




Then they lied you into a war in Iraq by telling you Iraq did have WMDS even though Clinton bombed them to hell in 1998


Then they told you the economy was fine after they allowed the banks to regulate themselves for years


Then the economy crashed and Americans Lost their homes


How stupid are you to keep believing them?
 
evince said:
The republicans told you Osama bin Ladin was no threat under Clinton


They said that bombing Iraq’s WMDS was fake

They told there was no threat until we got 911




Then they lied you into a war in Iraq by telling you Iraq did have WMDS even though Clinton bombed them to hell in 1998


Then they told you the economy was fine after they allowed the banks to regulate themselves for years


Then the economy crashed and Americans Lost their homes


How stupid are you to keep believing them?
Click to expand...



Republicans and right wing News lie


And you idiots just keep sucking up their lies
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So if they went to him with irrefutable proof, why didn't he present that irrefutable proof on his show?
Click to expand...

He said the proof was them reading back to him things that he told no one about...stories that were in the works that he only discussed in emails and texts with his staff. Presumably, he didn't break his story before he had done all his research...because that would make him Rachel Maddow.

:dunno:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Simply claiming that someone told you they knew what was in your emails isn't proof. It is unsubstantiated BS. What was in the emails Tucker claim the NSA knew about? When did Tucker send those emails? Why isn't he showing them to us?
Click to expand...

So back to this "we trust anonymous sources no matter how many times they are caught lying...until now" move. Not transparent at all. :rofl2:

200.webp
 
Arminius said:


The "right-wing rags" that were vindicated while yours were caught lying at every turn about hoax after hoax for four years straight, yes. :rofl2:

-the "Trump gassed protesters to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
Click to expand...

Damn


That is one big pile of shit


We’re you constipated for a year before you shat that out?
 
evince said:
The republicans told you Osama bin Ladin was no threat under Clinton


They said that bombing Iraq’s WMDS was fake



They told there was no threat until we got 911




Then they lied you into a war in Iraq by telling you Iraq did have WMDS even though Clinton bombed them to hell in 1998


Then they told you the economy was fine after they allowed the banks to regulate themselves for years


Then the economy crashed and Americans Lost their homes


How stupid are you to keep believing them?
Click to expand...

Why do you keep believing people who lie to you?
 
Arminius said:


He said the proof was them reading back to him things that he told no one about...stories that were in the works that he only discussed in emails and texts with his staff. Presumably, he didn't break his story before he had done all his research...because that would make him Rachel Maddow.

:dunno:



So back to this "we trust anonymous sources no matter how many times they are caught lying...until now" move. Not transparent at all. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

So he said but he didn't provide any evidence other than his say so. I could say I have evidence that Tucker Carlson is working for Putin. I know this because two people that worked for the KGB told me and read Tucker's emails to me. You will notice I have presented as much evidence as Tucker did. Why didn't Tucker tell us what was in the emails? Why didn't he tell us the date they called him? The lack of any substance says it really has no evidence other than his claim. Is that really your standard for evidence? If it is, then you should really stop posting that list of what you claim are hoaxes because they show your standards are bullshit.
 
How Team Trump used Fox News as a laundromat for unverified Russian information about top Democrats
By Marshall Cohen, Oliver Darcy and Zachary Cohen, CNN
Updated 4:17 PM EDT, Mon October 12, 2020
The News Corp. building on 6th Avenue, home to Fox News, the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal, on March 20, 2019 in New York City, New York. (Photo by Kevin Hagen/Getty Images)
(CNN) While most of the nation was largely fixated over the past week on President Donald Trump's coronavirus diagnosis, the President and his allies in right-wing media have been engrossed with something else entirely.

Trump, with the help of outlets like Fox News, has been pushing a dishonest narrative in touting intelligence documents that his administration declassified last month on the eve of the first presidential debate. They claimed the information was a supposed smoking gun proving that Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration sought to frame Trump with a Russian collusion scandal.

But when examined closely the documents indicate no such thing. In fact, by the Trump administration's own admission, they are based on unverified Russian intelligence that could be totally bogus. Which is to say that the President and Fox News personalities such as Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson are hyping and disseminating information that originates from a foreign adversary to bludgeon top Democratic officials.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So he said but he didn't provide any evidence other than his say so. I could say I have evidence that Tucker Carlson is working for Putin. I know this because two people that worked for the KGB told me and read Tucker's emails to me. You will notice I have presented as much evidence as Tucker did. Why didn't Tucker tell us what was in the emails? Why didn't he tell us the date they called him? The lack of any substance says it really has no evidence other than his claim. Is that really your standard for evidence? If it is, then you should really stop posting that list of what you claim are hoaxes because they show your standards are bullshit.
Click to expand...

you leftists are all the same. Tucker said it. I believe it. That settles it.
 
evince said:
The republicans told you Osama bin Ladin was no threat under Clinton
Click to expand...

Was no one threat? Want to try that again in adult-level actual English? :awesome:

evince said:
They said that bombing Iraq’s WMDS was fake
Click to expand...

That WHO bombing them was fake?

:cruisewhat:

evince said:
They told there was no threat until we got 911
Click to expand...

*You misspelled Democrats. :nono:

evince said:
Then they lied you into a war in Iraq by telling you Iraq did have WMDS even though Clinton bombed them to hell in 1998
Click to expand...

I guess you missed the NY Times article YEARS AFTER they relentlessly spoon-fed you unthinking Democrat lemmings that lie...the story where they admitted soldiers were being poisoned all over Iraq by the WMDs they were removing...the ones the NY Times spent YEARS lying about not existing.

Again, YOUR sources constantly get caught lying, not mine. :nono:

evince said:
Then they told you the economy was fine after they allowed the banks to regulate themselves for years
Click to expand...

I guess you missed the NY Times article warning that if Democrats kept threatening to drag banks into court, have them fined, branded as racist, and run out of business if they didn't start giving out bad loans to unqualified people, they would destroy the economy...in exactly the way that ended up unfolding in 2008...while the Demagogue Party naturally blamed the umpteenth government-created catastrophe on "not enough government." I guess you also missed the NY Times article that later admitted there was "little evidence" to suggest the meltdown had anything at all to do with deregulation or letting banks run themselves like the Constitution requires.

:rofl2:

evince said:
How stupid are you to keep believing them?
Click to expand...

Says the person who literally just got done humiliating themselves with lie after lie that even the NY Times confirms is blatantly erroneous trash. :lolup: :laugh: :rofl2:

This. THIS RIGHT HERE. THIS is why I love it when you take a break from being a spineless coward and actually descend into the arena to debate on rare occasion...it reveals unmistakably that your entire worldview is built on one ignorant lie after another.

200.webp
 
Last edited:
This story makes no sense. Tucker is already the most deplorable sack of shit on TV, what could the NSA leak that could take him off the air? Did he say something racist? That would just make him more popular. Did he say something about underage sex? He's already defended statutory rape.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
This story makes no sense. Tucker is already the most deplorable sack of shit on TV, what could the NSA leak that could take him off the air? Did he say something racist? That would just make him more popular. Did he say something about underage sex? He's already defended statutory rape.
Click to expand...

Funny. Tucker does not censor himself on his TV show.
 
Arminius said:


Was no one threat? Want to try that again in adult-level actual English? :awesome:



That WHO bombing them was fake?

:cruisewhat:



*You misspelled Democrats. :nono:



I guess you missed the NY Times article YEARS AFTER they relentlessly spoon-fed you unthinking Democrat lemmings that lie...the story where they admitted soldiers were being poisoned all over Iraq by the WMDs they were removing...the ones the NY Times spent YEARS lying about not existing.

Again, YOUR sources constantly get caught lying, not mine. :nono:



I guess you missed the NY Times article warning that if Democrats kept threatening to drag banks into court, have them fined, branded as racist, and run out of business if they didn't start giving out bad loans to unqualified people, they would destroy the economy...in exactly the way that ended up unfolding in 2008...while the Demagogue Party naturally blamed the umpteenth government-created catastrophe on "not enough government." I guess you also missed the NY Times article that later admitted there was "little evidence" to suggest the meltdown had anything at all to do with deregulation or letting banks run themselves like the Constitution requires.

:rofl2:



Says the person who literally just got done humiliating themselves with lie after lie that even the NY Times confirms is blatantly erroneous trash. :lolup: :laugh: :rofl2:

This. THIS RIGHT HERE. THIS is why I love it when you take a break from being a spineless coward and actually descend into the arena to debate on rare occasion...it reveals unmistakably that your entire worldview is built on one ignorant lie after another.

200.webp
Click to expand...



You failed

Your first bit here shows how stupid you are
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top