you're a moron, the question wasn't about fox news, it was about critical media, all he had to do was say that no, there is media out that is critical, fox news for one. what he said is, fox is the ONLY critical media...you're so dense you can't even see what he is actually saying.
instead, he blatently goes partisan and claims they are ENTIRELY devoted to attacking him. for someone that insults others intelligence, you lack any yourself.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/200...-new-agency-police-lenders-protect-consumers/
that is one news article today....it proves obama is a liar, what is attackign and biased against obama there....taht was the first article i grabbed....
perhaps YOU guys see bias because the other news agencies, according to obama, are NOT critical of him![]()
"perhaps YOU guys see bias because the other news agencies, according to obama, are NOT critical of him"
He didn't say that.
he brushed off criticims the media is not critical enough and cites ONLY one news station....and falsely whines they are entirely devoted to attacking his administration
sometimes you need to read between the lines onceler
That's an AP article, hotshot. See the little "AP" at the top of it?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/200...-new-agency-police-lenders-protect-consumers/
that is one news article today....it proves obama is a liar, what is attackign and biased against obama there....taht was the first article i grabbed....
perhaps YOU guys see bias because the other news agencies, according to obama, are NOT critical of him![]()
You're twisting his words, as usual.
You're such a bad liar.
doesn't matter, the claim is fox is entirely devoted to attacking him and doesn't post anything positive.....
they just posted on their website something neutral.
next
no, i'm reading between the lines, it is my opinion that is what he meant. why did he ONLY cite fox?
"First of all, I've got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration."
This is assumed to be Fox it could well be A certain religious channel....
Fox is a network of TV stations not one tv station like the religious one.
you're a moron, the question wasn't about fox news, it was about critical media, all he had to do was say that no, there is media out that is critical, fox news for one. what he said is, fox is the ONLY critical media...you're so dense you can't even see what he is actually saying.
instead, he blatently goes partisan and claims they are ENTIRELY devoted to attacking him. for someone that insults others intelligence, you lack any yourself.
Well, he started with "First of all, there is one station ENTIRELY devoted to criticism"
To me - and I imagine most other people with any intelligence - that implies that there are others who criticize, but not entirely.
To you, that means OH MY GOD HE SAYS FOX IS THE ONLY ONE WHO CRITICIZES HIM AT ALL AND ALL THE OTHER OUTLETS LOVE HIM
Yurt-world.
my interpretation of his words is valid. you have yours. i do not denigrate yours and it is the height of stupidity to denigrate mine. it appears that his comment is ambigious, do you know what ambigious means? further, his "joke" previously that fox is the only one who is not in his camp only serves to validate my interpretation. (PARAPHRASE ALERT SO NO NEED TO JUMP OUT OF YOUR SEAT AND GLEEFULLY THINK YOU CAUGHT YURT A "LIE")
he didn't mention any other station, only fox news and falsely claimed they are entirely devoted to attacking him. you just don't want to see the truth of his statements becuase you're biased. admit it onceler, he singled out fox and didn't mention any other station on purpose. he basically is saying that all other media are for him, e.g., biased in his favor. if all he can say is that ONE station is attacking him, that is pretty pathetic.
my interpretation of his words is valid. you have yours. i do not denigrate yours and it is the height of stupidity to denigrate mine. it appears that his comment is ambigious, do you know what ambigious means? further, his "joke" previously that fox is the only one who is not in his camp only serves to validate my interpretation. (PARAPHRASE ALERT SO NO NEED TO JUMP OUT OF YOUR SEAT AND GLEEFULLY THINK YOU CAUGHT YURT A "LIE")
he didn't mention any other station, only fox news and falsely claimed they are entirely devoted to attacking him. you just don't want to see the truth of his statements becuase you're biased. admit it onceler, he singled out fox and didn't mention any other station on purpose. he basically is saying that all other media are for him, e.g., biased in his favor. if all he can say is that ONE station is attacking him, that is pretty pathetic.
Yurt - you really can't be that dumb. We're not talking about "interpretation of words." You TWISTED his words. You repeated something AS FACT that bore no relation to what he said.
I can't believe you don't get that, or can't see it. I'd understand if you were embarassed about jumping to the wrong conclusion about what he said, but you are proudly LYING about what he said, and then defending that lie.
It's inexcusable.
Yurt = retarded. This thread proves it.
learn2read