Another proof Biden administration has succumb to the radical Left

AProudLefty said:
Influencer.
Click to expand...

BiodegradableHonestArcticfox-size_restricted.gif
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The same sort of people that populate the radical Right only in far greater numbers and desirous of totalitarian, Communist, hardline Socialist, Maoist, and other oppressive and controlling societies. On the radical Right you get true anarchists, separatists, and groups like sovereign citizens who act largely independently of one and other.
Click to expand...

Many factions to the radical right. Are you sure you are not a part of them?

Take responsibility for your own side to clean it up!

Biden did get a lot of support from the radical left. But he cannot abandon their concerns any more than the concerns of the MILLIONS OF Conservative DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS THAT also are depending on Biden to "Keep it real"!

No other president in history has had such a diverse constituent base, as Biden does in terms of the Conservative/Progressive spectrum, to have to balance his decisions and agenda moving forward. Presidents have to be the president for everyone in the nation- NOT JUST THE PARTY BASE! Biden is the most experienced politician in the field at bringing the two sides together to make deals.

Biden may be working too hard to please everyone among his base. But he is leaving it up to Congress to hash it out. The problem is the Republican side of Congress is just using obstruction tactics for partisan political reasons and refusing to participate!

Can we all just be fair and at least participate in the negotiation phase of these proposals by the Biden Administration? Joe Manchin, the Democrats most trusted Conservative, thinks they can. Is he wrong? Why?

Personally, I feel that the Democrat and Republican Conservatives have good ideas on where to "hold the line" on deficit spending, but Mitch is holding his Republicans back from the negotiations. THAT IS NOT RIGHT!

We must work together to get the Bills right!

And keep this in mind- Nobody gets everything they want, but if we try sometime, we get what we need!

So don't look past the needs of others, just because you don't particularly need the same things others do.

You can't please everyone- But you do have to please the voting and vocal majority. From a president's perspective, that is who elected you!
 
Last edited:
Installing an environmentalist in the position is fair after Trump putting industry insiders in every position he could. There is much damage to undo.
 
AProudLefty said:
His question is not a complex question fallacy.

You either are still claiming to have a MA degree or you are not. That's it. Simple.
Click to expand...

I still am since I do have one. It's in military history, since I've long specialized in that. I'm currently working on a book covering advanced technology development in the military from 1935 to 1955. One of my pet peeves is most people believe the Nazis / Germany led the world in most advanced technologies during that period (to 1945) when that was not the case at all. 1955 was chosen as the cutoff as that's about the year WW 2 technological developments peaked out and afterwards the rate of new invention started to slow significantly.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I still am since I do have one. It's in military history, since I've long specialized in that. I'm currently working on a book covering advanced technology development in the military from 1935 to 1955. One of my pet peeves is most people believe the Nazis / Germany led the world in most advanced technologies during that period (to 1945) when that was not the case at all. 1955 was chosen as the cutoff as that's about the year WW 2 technological developments peaked out and afterwards the rate of new invention started to slow significantly.
Click to expand...


Military History. Explains a lot. You don't know actual history.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I still am since I do have one. It's in military history, since I've long specialized in that. I'm currently working on a book covering advanced technology development in the military from 1935 to 1955. One of my pet peeves is most people believe the Nazis / Germany led the world in most advanced technologies during that period (to 1945) when that was not the case at all. 1955 was chosen as the cutoff as that's about the year WW 2 technological developments peaked out and afterwards the rate of new invention started to slow significantly.
Click to expand...

That would be an interesting thread. I would ask in that thread if there is going to be one if Germany led in rocket technology for example.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I still am since I do have one. It's in military history, since I've long specialized in that. I'm currently working on a book covering advanced technology development in the military from 1935 to 1955. One of my pet peeves is most people believe the Nazis / Germany led the world in most advanced technologies during that period (to 1945) when that was not the case at all. 1955 was chosen as the cutoff as that's about the year WW 2 technological developments peaked out and afterwards the rate of new invention started to slow significantly.
Click to expand...

Lol, Nazi Germans did lead in tech. It's no lie.
V2 rockets, turbo jets, stealth aircraft prototypes, panther tanks, the Sturmgewr, Konrad Zuses computer, among others.

Although a lot of it is due to Nazis increasing reeearch & development investments by the government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top