George floyd was a thug and scum bag

ThatOwlWoman said:
You clearly have never taken a college level course in biology, human A&P, or anthropology.

The ONLY H. sapiens sapiens subspecies that once existed are extinct. We still carry some of their DNA in our own genome.

"Race" and "nationality" are artificial human constructs with no scientific meaning. From a sociological point of view, they are used by scientifically-illiterate people either deliberately or because of ignorance. In your case, it is both.
Click to expand...

Dawkins is correct, if we go by the sub species & species of Animals then the same would apply to Humans.

For example Dogs are 99.9% genetically similar to Wolves & that makes Dogs a separate species from Wolves.
But, Human races are also 99.9% genetically similar too, it means somehow there is only an artificial construct without meaning & biological equality!?

That's just not the case, race can be shown by skeletal remains & DNA haplogroups / autosomal DNA.

Nor, has race realism been dethroned.

More of the World believes in race realism including Asia & Eastern Europe, which covers way more people than America & Western Europe which have more race deniers.

Even in the West, some of the leaders are race realists like Dawkins, Francis Cricket, and James Watson.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Dawkins is correct, if we go by the sub species & species of Animals then the same would apply to Humans.

For example Dogs are 99.9% genetically similar to Wolves & that makes Dogs a separate species from Wolves.
But, Human races are also 99.9% genetically similar too, it means somehow there is only an artificial construct without meaning & biological equality!?

That's just not the case, race can be shown by skeletal remains & DNA haplogroups / autosomal DNA.

Nor, has race realism been dethroned.

More of the World believes in race realism including Asia & Eastern Europe, which covers way more people than America & Western Europe which have more race deniers.

Even in the West, some of the leaders are race realists like Dawkins, Francis Cricket, and James Watson.
Click to expand...

"Francis Cricket"? Bwahahahahaha!!!

Dismissed, racist.
 
Canis lupus familiaris can breed with canis lupus and the offspring can breed as well.

This makes the domestic dog a sub-species of the grey wolf, NOT a separate species. The difference is that the shape of a dog's skull in front accommodates a larger cerebrum portion of the brain.
This frontal area thing is a dominant gene, so dog-wolf hybrids become 100% dog in only thirty generations.

Since humans of all races can breed, and then the offspring can breed as well, all human races are the same species.
The only argument that can be made is that we're different subspecies, but that argument has few followers in science.

Even being the same species isn't super important, though.
My best friend is a dog.
You like someone or something or you don't.
No need to formulate theories to support a subjective like or dislike.

This is what's different from horses and donkeys, for example. A male donkey can impregnate a female horse, but the offspring [mules] cannot procreate.
Thus horses and donkeys are different species. Same for lions and tigers.
 
Last edited:
NiftyNiblick said:
Canis lupus familiaris can breed with canis lupus and the offspring can breed as well.

This makes the domestic dog a sub-species of the grey wolf, NOT a separate species. The difference is that the shape of a dog's skull in front accommodates a larger cerebrum portion of the brain.
This frontal area thing is a dominant gene, so dog-wolf hybrids become 100% dog in only thirty generations.

Since humans of all races can breed, and then the offspring can breed as well, all human races are the same species.
The only argument that can be made is that we're different subspecies, but that argument has few followers in science.

Even being the same species isn't super important, though.
My best friend is a dog.
You like someone or something or you don't.
No need to formulate theories to support a subjective like or dislike.

This is what's different from horses and donkeys, for example. A male donkey can impregnate a female horse, but the offspring [mules] cannot procreate.
Thus horses and donkeys are different species. Same for lions and tigers.
Click to expand...

I agree that Dogs are a separate sub species rather than species.

But, some species can reproduce & create fertile offspring like the Polar Bear vs Brown Bears.

I do agree that the Polar bear should actually be a far removed sub species of Brown bear.

While Humans & Dogs are not so far removed sub species.

Also some sub species should be declassified like some of the Coyote Sub species.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
There's No Scientific Basis for Race—It's a Made-Up Labelhttps://www.nationalgeographic.com › magazine › article
Mar 12, 2018 — There's No Scientific Basis for Race—It's a Made-Up Label. It's been used to define and separate people for millennia. But the concept of ..


How Science and Genetics are Reshaping the Race Debate ...https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu › flash › science-genetics-r...
Apr 17, 2017 — There is also ZERO biological evidence of more than one human race, though there are inherited traits based on ancestry. There is Zero basis on ...
Click to expand...

Indoctrination.

Most of the World's population still believes in race.

Rightfully so.

If Coyote migrations created sub species so has Human migrations.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Francis Crick***

Unfortunately my smart phone changed Crick to Cricket.

Go figure...

Typically it's the ignorant who rather than debating rely on name calling, semantics & typos.
Click to expand...

You have a Cricket smart phone or you're too dumb to spell check?

We all make mistakes, Witold. No need to get your panties in a wad over it. OTOH, fucking morons who keep making the same mistakes are proving they are fucking morons.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
There's No Scientific Basis for Race—It's a Made-Up Labelhttps://www.nationalgeographic.com › magazine › article
Mar 12, 2018 — There's No Scientific Basis for Race—It's a Made-Up Label. It's been used to define and separate people for millennia. But the concept of ..


How Science and Genetics are Reshaping the Race Debate ...https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu › flash › science-genetics-r...
Apr 17, 2017 — There is also ZERO biological evidence of more than one human race, though there are inherited traits based on ancestry. There is Zero basis on ...
Click to expand...

Agreed. Witold has this been told this repeatedly but Witold is retarded, a genetic malformation. He doesn't remember then and he won't remember now.

Dutch Uncle said:
"Genetic groups" is a long way from saying they are different "races".

http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/
In the biological and social sciences, the consensus is clear: race is a social construct, not a biological attribute. Today, scientists prefer to use the term “ancestry” to describe human diversity (Figure 3). “Ancestry” reflects the fact that human variations do have a connection to the geographical origins of our ancestors—with enough information about a person’s DNA, scientists can make a reasonable guess about their ancestry. However, unlike the term “race,” it focuses on understanding how a person’s history unfolded, not how they fit into one category and not another. In a clinical setting, for instance, scientists would say that diseases such as sickle-cell anemia and cystic fibrosis are common in those of “sub-Saharan African” or “Northern European” descent, respectively, rather than in those who are “black” or “white”.
Click to expand...
 
Wonder how all of the liberals here would feel if floyd had held a gun to the stomach of their pregnant wife while he and his buddys robbed the house .

Yes floyad is a hero a convicted robber thief drug iser and stick up man a great example for the black youth of America
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Francis Crick***

Unfortunately my smart phone changed Crick to Cricket.

Go figure...

Typically it's the ignorant who rather than debating rely on name calling, semantics & typos.
Click to expand...

You are a wonderful example of that last bit.

Come back and discuss "race" once you've taken some college level courses on biology, human anatomy and physiology, and anthropology.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Indoctrination.

Most of the World's population still believes in race.

Rightfully so.

If Coyote migrations created sub species so has Human migrations.
Click to expand...

Once upon a time most of the world believed that the Earth was the center of the Universe. It still didn't make it so. :rolleyes:

Why can't you just admit that you are a racist, and be happy with it? After all, you've got many of your kind here on JPP.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
You have a Cricket smart phone or you're too dumb to spell check?

We all make mistakes, Witold. No need to get your panties in a wad over it. OTOH, fucking morons who keep making the same mistakes are proving they are fucking morons.
Click to expand...

My smart phone changed Crick to Cricket.

Typical West Euro trash you are.

Such small minds & such OCD panic attacks.

You people long said you were the master race, in reality you people are more of the disaster race.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You are a wonderful example of that last bit.

Come back and discuss "race" once you've taken some college level courses on biology, human anatomy and physiology, and anthropology.
Click to expand...

I might name call in response to others name calling against me.
But I rarely if even ever start off that way.

Truth is I'd much prefer to have calm calculated debate here.

Most users here can't handle that.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Agreed. Witold has this been told this repeatedly but Witold is retarded, a genetic malformation. He doesn't remember then and he won't remember now.
Click to expand...

You are severely brainwashed.
You are the most brainwashed here hands down.

Due to your high level of desperation &: arrogance & simple intellect
 
Same thing race deniers are doing.
More scientists say so.
Well, that's not true.
Because Asian & Eastern European scientists believe more in race realism.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Once upon a time most of the world believed that the Earth was the center of the Universe. It still didn't make it so. :rolleyes:

Why can't you just admit that you are a racist, and be happy with it? After all, you've got many of your kind here on JPP.
Click to expand...

Most of the World still believes in race.
Nice try on a poor lie.
 
Jan Sobieski said:
Most of the World still believes in race.
Nice try on a poor lie.
Click to expand...

Most young American children believe in Santa Claus. Is he real? Most Xtians believe in heaven. Is heaven real?

As I said, race is an artificial human construct that is biologically meaningless. Only those who wish to assert the superiority of one group over another insist otherwise. We call those people racists. And we don't like them.

Which of course is why you wish to pretend that you aren't one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top