Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Of course, of course.
Why don't you just say it's because Clinton is a Democrat, and Sanford is a Republican?
It's easier.
do you have posts where you criticized edwards?
Of course, of course.
Why don't you just say it's because Clinton is a Democrat, and Sanford is a Republican?
It's easier.
The one difference here, Sanford didn't LIE in front of a grand jury and try to obstruct justice....
Like you lefties like to leave out when you say........but it was ONLY a blow job...
No..
but why don't you just say you only give a shit about this, is because he is a Republican...
do you have posts where you criticized edwards?
I defended Sanford on the other thread. I don't think some of the more private aspects of this should see the light of day in the media, like they are.
Then, I saw what he said about Clinton. THAT is hypocrisy.
I could still care less about the affair. It's an unfortunate situation for him & his family, but it's not a public matter, imo, and I am not calling on him to resign.
Yes, it's called narcissism.People who self-promote themselves have delusions of grandeur. They are easy to spot.
oh yea and you just so blindly happen to not mention the 50 million dollars of taxpayers money used by right wing extremist to persecute an existing President until they pulled him in court and asked him a private question about a non-germain topic in a civil suit. Clinton fucked up when he lied but lets not forget about the right wing persecution by an amoral groups of extremists who would, will and have stopped at nothing to exploit ultimate power. We saw what happened after Clinton what happens when these extremist were trusted in positions of responsibility, they screwed the pooch and the American people. So get off your soap box you damned hypocrit.I wouldn't of cared if Clinton was screwing a pack of sled dogs (male and female.) It's the fact he looked into that camera and Lied and said, I didn't have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky..and then tried to convince us that oral sex isn't sex...and then involved other people in his mess to obstruct justice...
oh yea and you just so blindly happen to not mention the 50 million dollars of taxpayers money used by right wing extremist to persecute an existing President until they pulled him in court and asked him a private question about a non-germain topic in a civil suit. Clinton fucked up when he lied but lets not forget about the right wing persecution by an amoral groups of extremists who would, will and have stopped at nothing to exploit ultimate power. We saw what happened after Clinton what happens when these extremist were trusted in positions of responsibility, they screwed the pooch and the American people. So get off your soap box you damned hypocrit.
oh yea and you just so blindly happen to not mention the 50 million dollars of taxpayers money used by right wing extremist to persecute an existing President until they pulled him in court and asked him a private question about a non-germain topic in a civil suit. Clinton fucked up when he lied but lets not forget about the right wing persecution by an amoral groups of extremists who would, will and have stopped at nothing to exploit ultimate power. We saw what happened after Clinton what happens when these extremist were trusted in positions of responsibility, they screwed the pooch and the American people. So get off your soap box you damned hypocrit.
Good gawd, I bet there could be a tape of a Democrat killing someone in cold blood, and you would still defend them to the bitter end...you are a real goosestepper, aren't you..?
See response to meme.
You have NOTHING in your arsenal except for strawmen.
lmao....you just proved me right that you have no idea what a strawman argument is....
i win, i win, you lose, you lose
![]()
Informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of opponent's position.
Exactly what you did here.
As I said in the initial post, the affair doesn't really bother me; it's about his hypocrisy for condemning Clinton's similar activity.
And you bring up....Edwards? See, you tried to pretend I was criticizing Sanford for the affair itself, which I was clear didn't really bother me. You created a fallacy, and misrepresented my position, because you couldn't really argue the original position.
Get it now?
do you have posts where you criticized edwards?
This post had to do w/ the money...how again?
What an idiot...
It's funny how the left tells others to stay out of their bedrooms, but then they can't get enough of the sordid details of someones affair..![]()