Honduran President: no one can make me resign

Yurt said:
there is hypocrisy here....moron

so your little gotcha rants are nothing more than intellectually dishonesty...big surprise, ok for you but not for others :rolleyes:

how can someone be against iraq or the US meddling in other nations militarily and yet argue for doing the same here? how don't see the hypocrisy in that is just another example of how partisan and hackish you really are.
Click to expand...

And who are we talking about? Chavez?

WM is messing with you.

So, the big "hypocrisy" is in reference to Chavez; why don't you state that in your initial post, instead of dishonestly implying that there is some relevant group that was against Iraq, but wants to invade Honduras?
 
Onceler said:
And who are we talking about? Chavez?

WM is messing with you.

So, the big "hypocrisy" is in reference to Chavez; why don't you state that in your initial post, instead of dishonestly implying that there is some relevant group that was against Iraq, but wants to invade Honduras?
Click to expand...

WM has proclaimed all over the board, are you calling him a liar? why doesn't WM come out and say he is joking...others are taking him serious, according to you WM is lying

you lying shit....there was no dishonesty, everthing i have stated is 100% accurate....you are the one who misread my words and LIED about what i said....

next
 
Yurt said:
WM has proclaimed all over the board, are you calling him a liar? why doesn't WM come out and say he is joking...others are taking him serious, according to you WM is lying

you lying shit....there was no dishonesty, everthing i have stated is 100% accurate....you are the one who misread my words and LIED about what i said....

next
Click to expand...

Look at WM's post above mine.

Even if WM did advocate that, your post would be pathetic: it would be WM, and Chavez.

"Everything I have stated is 100% accurate." You probably believe that.
 
Yurt said:
not mass calls, but people calling for it...watermark right above your post, chavez has threatened

so then you do not support military intervention to remove the current president of honduras...is that right? let them sort it out on their own? or do you support any kind of outside pressure?
Click to expand...

well onceler, care to debate or just lie your way through this thread
 
Onceler said:
Look at WM's post above mine.

Even if WM did advocate that, your post would be pathetic: it would be WM, and Chavez.

"Everything I have stated is 100% accurate." You probably believe that.
Click to expand...

i've said other nations support chavez you ninny...and other people in chavez's government support him...i've read on other boards dems supporting action...since i read it on other boards i did not mention it here....

name one thing i said that was no accurate onceler....be honest
 
blackascoal said:
Who gave you or Bush the right to interfere in Iraqi politics? IKt certainly wasn't the Iraqi people.
Click to expand...
it was the US congress, which includes a whole bunch of those democrats you idolize.

blackascoal said:
TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras (AP) — Thousands of Hondurans demonstrated Wednesday for the return of ousted President Manuel Zelaya, who vowed to fly home this weekend despite a warrant for his arrest. Thousands more rallied in favor of the military-backed government.
Click to expand...
perfect excuse to arrest then execute the traitor to his country.
 
Yurt said:
well onceler, care to debate or just lie your way through this thread
Click to expand...

I don't blame you for wanting to change topics. Once again, things were getting very embarassing for you.

Even the context of your question is dishonest: as though the only options are military intervention, or nothing. Same argument Bushies made about Iraq.

The international community is responding. The UN is not recognizing Micheletti. Obama has openly sided with Zelaya. The idea of any kind of military action is crazy.
 
Onceler said:
The international community is responding. The UN is not recognizing Micheletti. Obama has openly sided with Zelaya. The idea of any kind of military action is crazy.
Click to expand...

so, basically what you're saying is, the majority of the nations on this planet support the illegal actions of an ousted ruler and condemn the legitimate government actions of the Honduran congress to remove an elected leader who chose to ignore the countries courts and it's congressional branch to pursue his own objective of lifetime rulership. yay for humanity. you all should die and I look forward to the bloodshed.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
so, basically what you're saying is, the majority of the nations on this planet support the illegal actions of an ousted ruler and condemn the legitimate government actions of the Honduran congress to remove an elected leader who chose to ignore the countries courts and it's congressional branch to pursue his own objective of lifetime rulership. yay for humanity. you all should die and I look forward to the bloodshed.
Click to expand...

I reject your characterization. And you're pretty obsessed with apocolyptic bloodshed.

If you haven't read "The Road" yet, you'd like it...
 
SmarterThanYou said:
so, basically what you're saying is, the majority of the nations on this planet support the illegal actions of an ousted ruler and condemn the legitimate government actions of the Honduran congress to remove an elected leader who chose to ignore the countries courts and it's congressional branch to pursue his own objective of lifetime rulership. yay for humanity. you all should die and I look forward to the bloodshed.
Click to expand...

Even if all true. How is it our business? Sounds like a UN issue or some other such organization.
 
Onceler said:
I reject your characterization. And you're pretty obsessed with apocolyptic bloodshed.

If you haven't read "The Road" yet, you'd like it...
Click to expand...


Maybe Blood Meridian would be a good read for him, too. It's got plenty of bloodshed and lawlessness. It doesn't have the apocolyptic angle, but it's a damn good book.
 
Onceler said:
I don't blame you for wanting to change topics. Once again, things were getting very embarassing for you.

Even the context of your question is dishonest: as though the only options are military intervention, or nothing. Same argument Bushies made about Iraq.

The international community is responding. The UN is not recognizing Micheletti. Obama has openly sided with Zelaya. The idea of any kind of military action is crazy.
Click to expand...

it is not changing the topic....you just proved again how dishonest you are...

from the OP:

seems to me the entire government is behind this new president....what gives anyone else the right to intervene?
Click to expand...

yes, the international community is intervening, what gives them the right?
 
Onceler said:
I reject your characterization. And you're pretty obsessed with apocolyptic bloodshed.
Click to expand...
my characterization is deadly accurate, whether you like it or not. and bloodshed is imminent. there are some people that would rather die (taking a whole bunch of you collectivists with us) than submit to your statist agenda.

Onceler said:
If you haven't read "The Road" yet, you'd like it...
Click to expand...

author name? I'll look it up.
 
Demwit said:
Even if all true. How is it our business? Sounds like a UN issue or some other such organization.
Click to expand...

its nobodies business but honduras, and certainly not the UNs. Are there human rights issues being violated right now in Honduras? don't think so.

The UN needs to back off and so does Obama, as well as every other latin american nation.
 
Yurt said:
Roberto Micheletti said in an interview with The Associated Press late Tuesday that "no one can make me resign," defying the United Nations, the OAS, the Obama administration and other leaders that have condemned the military coup that overthrew Zelaya.


,,,

Micheletti, a member of Zelaya's Liberal Party who was named interim leader by Congress following the coup, said Zelaya "has already committed crimes against the constitution and the law."

"He can no longer return to the presidency of the republic unless a president from another Latin American country comes and imposes him using guns," said Micheletti, who shrugged off intense international pressure.

"No one can make me resign if I do not violate the laws of the country," Micheletti said. "If there is any invasion against our country, 7.5 million Hondurans will be ready to defend our territory and our laws and our homeland and our government."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090701/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_honduras_coup

so let me get this right, those that do not support the removal of saddam by force, the force was American led based on a lie to punish a former supported "ally" who mistakenly acted with nationalistic attitudes support the removal of this president by military action....

seems to me the entire government is behind this new president....what gives anyone else the right to intervene?
Click to expand...
Who is calling for military intervention?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top