Senator Al Franken!

Then consider that he beat the incumbent republican....
That has to leave a mark.

no, that makes you dems look like pathetic partisan idiots.....

why you guys are using his win as a "one up" over coleman is beyond me....all it shows is that dems are stoopid....you guys have been having a field day with....loook at this, he beat coleman....wow....what does that say....yeah....

it says dems are stupid
 
no, that makes you dems look like pathetic partisan idiots.....

why you guys are using his win as a "one up" over coleman is beyond me....all it shows is that dems are stoopid....you guys have been having a field day with....loook at this, he beat coleman....wow....what does that say....yeah....

it says dems are stupid

Hey I did not vote for either one of the idjits.
I am just enjoying the show and what the heck it is a supermajority in the senate.
 
no, that makes you dems look like pathetic partisan idiots.....

why you guys are using his win as a "one up" over coleman is beyond me....all it shows is that dems are stoopid....you guys have been having a field day with....loook at this, he beat coleman....wow....what does that say....yeah....

it says dems are stupid

It doesn't really say anything at all about Dems in general.

This was a MN race, that Coleman probably should have won easily. If it speaks to anything nationally, it's how much trouble the GOP is in when they can't even defend a seat like Coleman's against a guy who is essentially a goofball.
 
It doesn't really say anything at all about Dems in general.

This was a MN race, that Coleman probably should have won easily. If it speaks to anything nationally, it's how much trouble the GOP is in when they can't even defend a seat like Coleman's against a guy who is essentially a goofball.

no, all it shows it how stupid dems are....they vote for a D no matter how bad the choice....you guys keep saying how this is bad for repubs or coleman....if that is true....then you guys voted for an idiot solely because he has a D next to his name.
 
no, all it shows it how stupid dems are....they vote for a D no matter how bad the choice....you guys keep saying how this is bad for repubs or coleman....if that is true....then you guys voted for an idiot solely because he has a D next to his name.

Did some Rebutlikens vote for Frankin?
 
no, all it shows it how stupid dems are....they vote for a D no matter how bad the choice....you guys keep saying how this is bad for repubs or coleman....if that is true....then you guys voted for an idiot solely because he has a D next to his name.

I didn't vote for anyone in MN.

It IS bad for the GOP and for Coleman. In any election, there are a certain % who will pull for the Dems, and a certain % who pull for the GOP, no matter what. Neither the GOP nor Coleman could make a vital enough case to the crucial swing vote - against a guy like Franken - to pull out a victory.

Trust me; it speaks volumes.
 
I didn't vote for anyone in MN.

It IS bad for the GOP and for Coleman. In any election, there are a certain % who will pull for the Dems, and a certain % who pull for the GOP, no matter what. Neither the GOP nor Coleman could make a vital enough case to the crucial swing vote - against a guy like Franken - to pull out a victory.

Trust me; it speaks volumes.

yeah, it speaks volumes that dems are morons....you guys voted for franken.....live with it....

you are so partisan you can't even see the actual logic of your statements about franken beating coleman....according to you, it is bad....that is franken must have been a long shot.....because of due process he won by, what, 350 votes.........and you call this is a victory.....you call this a slap in the face to republicans.....but wait......franken should not have won, no experience, a joke.....but since was a D

350 votes

and that to you is "volumes"

you're sad
 
yeah, it speaks volumes that dems are morons....you guys voted for franken.....live with it....

you are so partisan you can't even see the actual logic of your statements about franken beating coleman....according to you, it is bad....that is franken must have been a long shot.....because of due process he won by, what, 350 votes.........and you call this is a victory.....you call this a slap in the face to republicans.....but wait......franken should not have won, no experience, a joke.....but since was a D

350 votes

and that to you is "volumes"

you're sad

Is this supposed to pass for an "argument"?

Like I said, Coleman should have won easily. He didn't, against Franken.

Ask the GOP how they feel about that, and if they think it's an optimistic sign for the future of the party.

LOL!
 
Is this supposed to pass for an "argument"?

Like I said, Coleman should have won easily. He didn't, against Franken.

Ask the GOP how they feel about that, and if they think it's an optimistic sign for the future of the party.

LOL!

LOL.....you guys voted for franken becuase of the D....you should be ashamed and embarrassed....somehow you think franken winning is a good thing

lmao....seriously....
 
yeah, it speaks volumes that dems are morons....you guys voted for franken.....live with it....

you are so partisan you can't even see the actual logic of your statements about franken beating coleman....according to you, it is bad....that is franken must have been a long shot.....because of due process he won by, what, 350 votes.........and you call this is a victory.....you call this a slap in the face to republicans.....but wait......franken should not have won, no experience, a joke.....but since was a D

350 votes

and that to you is "volumes"

you're sad

Interesting that there were more votes than voters in some counties. Hmmmmmmm!!!! I wouldn't put it past Franken.
 
LOL.....you guys voted for franken becuase of the D....you should be ashamed and embarrassed....somehow you think franken winning is a good thing

lmao....seriously....

franken is a smart guy... clearly as qualified as many other senators of both parties...AND... franken makes 60. That is a VERY good thing... for democrats. for you republicans? not so much. sorry.
 
99% of His creation is not gay. That ranks an "A" in any book, don't it? *shrug*
So why is he so inept at getting rid of 1%. You would think that someone that could so easily rid Egypt of EVERY first born could do something so easy as ridding the world of queers. Unless of course the whole passover thing is BULLSHIT.
 
God give man Free Will; some choose wrong. When my children choose wrong I punish them too. *Braces for your next caricature: 'You kill your children...'*

I never asked you to debate anything; you took that on yourself. *shrug*
Your analogy of god to you is flawed. You may punish your children for misbehaving but you DON'T push them from your site. God lays out the rules and then condemns for a minor slight. To make your analogy work, it would be better to say you tell your 2 year old not to play in the street but if he does it was his free will and you are going to do nothing to stop him. That is god of the bible. And if Gandhi is not not allowed in Heaven but murderers who sincerely ask for forgiveness get in, I will spend my time with Gandhi.
 
Your analogy of god to you is flawed. You may punish your children for misbehaving but you DON'T push them from your site. God lays out the rules and then condemns for a minor slight. To make your analogy work, it would be better to say you tell your 2 year old not to play in the street but if he does it was his free will and you are going to do nothing to stop him. That is god of the bible. And if Gandhi is not not allowed in Heaven but murderers who sincerely ask for forgiveness get in, I will spend my time with Gandhi.

I do not believe in an afterlife, but if there is one I sure do not want to spend eternity with Falwell and his hate spewing ilk.

Ghandi would be fine though.
 
Back
Top