8th largest economy of the world

on the contrary, i stand by my comment that those propositions were trash that would have protected some special interests and raised regressive taxes and fees

It was regressive because it was a compromise. The conservatives wouldn't accept a more progressive package. You should have been a realist and realized that this compromise was pretty much the only option, and after it was over the only other option would be to cut whatever the convulted constitution said they could.

IMHO, you guys should write a new constitution so that it takes a 2/3 majority to pass a constitutional amendment, and a 50% majority to pass a budget (50% for taxes would be preferable as well, but it's not realistic)n .
 
It was regressive because it was a compromise. The conservatives wouldn't accept a more progressive package. You should have been a realist and realized that this compromise was pretty much the only option, and after it was over the only other option would be to cut whatever the convulted constitution said they could.

IMHO, you guys should write a new constitution so that it takes a 2/3 majority to pass a constitutional amendment, and a 50% majority to pass a budget (50% for taxes would be preferable as well, but it's not realistic)n .

Don Quixote a realist? surely you jest

politically, ca is schizophrenic south ca and coastal ca liberal and inland ca conservative

closing a 26 billion deficit cannot be done without some tax increase but the reps think it can be done with just cuts
 
Back
Top