Ginsburg: I thought Roe was to rid undesirables

PostmodernProphet said:
it reflects her disdain for a system which only affects them, which is why she was in favor of a Medicaid system which freely provided them with abortions....the net result of which is obviously a reduction in their children....
Click to expand...

Planned Parenthood, an organization btw that was created by Margaret Sanger to reduce the population of blacks is proof that liberals, at least pre 1970's, were the most racist group in America.
 
Last edited:
Watermark said:
Yeah, and since children are out of the birth canal that's never a problem.
Click to expand...

....liberals consider the unborn as children, up to the point in time they decide to kill them......that's why none of them have Non-person Lump of Protoplasm Showers instead of Baby Showers......
 
Watermark said:
That's a Christian talking. :)
Click to expand...
what was the religion of the guy who accused me of talking about incest?.....or does that not interest you?......I find atheists to be hypocrites......they speak highly of reason, but display none of it.....
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
hardly.....the Times article is a weak attempt at spinning, at best.....it was HER interpretation of what was happening at the time....that isn't "attributing the sentiment to others"........in addition from her statements you can surely recognize she was disappointed that things didn't turn out the way she had interpreted it....
Click to expand...
and you're a moron. I don't need you to interpret for me what the article meant. It's there in black and white and since I probably have a reading comprehension skills vastly superior to yours I'd have to draw the conclusion that your reading skills are incredibly poor based upon the conclusion you've drawn.
 
blackascoal said:
That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Posted are her actual words in the context she intended, yet you still come away trying to paint this as something that clearly, most clearly it is not.

And, even more disingenuously, claim that because she was disappointed that things didn't turn out the way she intended somehow validates the idiotic claim.

"So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don't know why this hasn't been said more often."

That is what she hadn't intended and it doesn't have a damn thing to do with what the knuckledraggers claim.

What IS evident from this and a plethora of issues that face the country is the right has nothing to offer but emotionalism based on ignorance-ism.
Click to expand...
You're giving him to much credit. He simply just can't read.
 
Mottleydude said:
and you're a moron. I don't need you to interpret for me what the article meant. It's there in black and white and since I probably have a reading comprehension skills vastly superior to yours I'd have to draw the conclusion that your reading skills are incredibly poor based upon the conclusion you've drawn.
Click to expand...

lol.....well good for you.....how were those comprehension skills working for you when you listened to Obama's speeches......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top