Whatever floats your boat. Then all the left does is refute sources anyway when they ARE given. Whatever.
Daily Mail? No wonder you didn't post a link.![]()
We only do that when you Reichtards use biased, discredited sources. Like the Daily Mail. Breitbart. Gateway Pundit. Etc. Don't use alt-RW discredited sources and no one will need to refute them.
BTW, the letter is just a letter and does not mean that Bannon cannot be arrested for failure to appear when subpoenaed.
I don't think this is accurate. A pardon is forever, yes, but it does not cover future crimes. Contempt of court is a crime.
Which is why, among other reasons, the Dems will lose big time as people lose more faith in them and the system. An ongoing rolling coup and these feckless fools will do nothing.
They convene Tuesday for the vote.Correct. Hence my assertion he can be arrested for Contempt of Congress. However it is unlikely he will be while there is pending litigation on Executive Privilege going on.
My point was that this action (supposed contempt of congress charges) will not affect his previous pardon, because a pardon is a permanent thing.
They convene Tuesday for the vote.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cn...contempt-referral-jan-6-panel-chair-says.html
Anything else? Or is this just an OCD moment? I posted a link. It's over.

Which sums up what Damocles said. It would be nice if the dems would actually spend their time addressing the problems this country is experiencing instead of chasing ghosts.
Correct. Hence my assertion he can be arrested for Contempt of Congress. However it is unlikely he will be while there is pending litigation on Executive Privilege going on.
My point was that this action (supposed contempt of congress charges) will not affect his previous pardon, because a pardon is a permanent thing.
Yes. It's fair better to forget that a disgraced, corrupt ex-IMPOTUSx2 formented an insurrection that killed five people and injured over a hundred more because he lost the election.
Something tells me that if Hillary had done that, you guys would be parading her head on a pike around DC. Of course, being a far more ethical person, Hillary would have conceded and moved on. You know, like she did in 2016.
You just made my case for me again. Only look at links, but never credit the content.......which was a legal letter. Shallow bunch in here.

Please Owl Woman. Show me the five people killed by the "insurrection".
Please Owl Woman. Show me the five people killed by the "insurrection".
Ashli Babbit was one.
Two died of natural causes and another by accidental overdose of amphetamines per the Autopsy report:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...806608-97cf-11eb-a6d0-13d207aadb78_story.html
That statement said autopsies concluded that Kevin Greeson, 55, of Athens, Ala., and Benjamin Philips, 50, of Ringtown, Pa., died of natural causes due to cardiovascular disease. The medical examiner ruled that Rosanne Boyland, 34, of Kennesaw, Ga., died of accidental acute amphetamine intoxication.
And then Sicknick who was sprayed with some nasty bear spray and 2 folks were charged in spraying him with it.
So, of 5 deaths... sort of. She just assumes that means that the crowd somehow killed all those folks, even though the evidence doesn't support that assertion.