SO...WHERE ARE THE CHARGES????? BANNON "NO-SHOWED"...... 
WHOA! House Riot Panel Will ‘Immediately’ Pursue Charges on Bannon if He no-shows
- Thread starter reagansghost
- Start date
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
SO...WHERE ARE THE CHARGES????? BANNON "NO-SHOWED"......
You are one dumb cracka
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Plus he was not employed by the trump administration on Jan 06th
If Hillary's a criminal it shouldn't be hard for you to list the crime or crimes she was convicted for. Or if not that, the crime or crimes to which she pleaded guilty, not guilty or no contest.
SO WHAT's THE HOLDUP...?
LIST ALL THE "INSURRECTION" CHARGES THE IMBECILIC HOUSE POLITBURO WILL PRODUCE...RIGHT HERE:
LIST ALL THE "INSURRECTION" CHARGES THE IMBECILIC HOUSE POLITBURO WILL PRODUCE...RIGHT HERE:
My comment to STY wasn't a request for your whataboutism, grokweenie.
I know, right? Not a single HillaryHater that I've ever debated with can tell me a single legal action, guilty plea, or conviction she has had. She doesn't come across as particularly likeable, but so fucking what? I don't need to LIKE our president. I just need him or her to be strong, courageous, and ethical. Oh, and sane. More sane than that last one. lol
Suffice it to say that America is not yet ready for an intelligent, strong, experienced woman at the helm... because of stupid weak little men like STY and ilk.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I am never surprised about the 180 degree turns that liberals and conservatives take upon the 'authoritah' giving so called definitions and reports about high political officials, depending upon the party letter that follows their name, of course..........
you can be as obtuse as you need to be to preserve the limited amount of sanity in your mind, but if the FBI needs to interchange a couple words about a report on negligent or careless email handlings, and you jump upon one over the other to defend your party................well, you're so easily dismissed as part of the problem that you don't need to be taken seriously any longer
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I know, right? Not a single HillaryHater that I've ever debated with can tell me a single legal action, guilty plea, or conviction she has had. She doesn't come across as particularly likeable, but so fucking what? I don't need to LIKE our president. I just need him or her to be strong, courageous, and ethical. Oh, and sane. More sane than that last one. lol
Suffice it to say that America is not yet ready for an intelligent, strong, experienced woman at the helm... because of stupid weak little men like STY and ilk.
cute...but I served with woman that could cut throats as easily as me............and I had no problem with them........but you hold on to that spark of feminism like a lifeline.........its pretty much all you have.
I'M SURE YOUR LITTLE BITCHY SNARK KEEPS ANYONE FROM NOTICING YOU HAVE NO RESPONSE TO MY CHALLENGING YOUR ASININE NONSENSE...PER USUAL.
Please continue to make up nonsense. It's why your ilk are so despised and ridiculed. Thanks!
SmarterthanYou
rebel
just because you choose to delude yourself, does not invalidate my military service......nor my viewpoints about women I served with in the USMC............in fact, you pale in comparison to those.......compared to a woman marine, you're like a child
It's sad that you believe that anyone who disagrees with you is trying to "invalidate [my] military service."
Honey, I have no desire to compare myself with anyone else, including women who have served. If that's how you choose to measure the worth of someone, knock yourself out. Mostly the rest of us have different values.
You have often made references to "The Handmaid's Tale," red robes, veils, sex slaves, etc. to me. You've no doubt done the same to other women.
Only weak puny males feel the need to pretend to be dominant like that. Tip: If you feel the need to threaten, you are NOT dominant. You're just a typical wannabe-Rambo loser who is terrified by women. Sorry.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello T. A. Gardner,
I think he did a pretty good job, had very convincing evidence, but the Republican Senate jurors were prejudiced and were going to vote to acquit anyway because it was not a court of law and they were allowed to make purely political votes and that is exactly what they did.
I think he did a pretty good job, had very convincing evidence, but the Republican Senate jurors were prejudiced and were going to vote to acquit anyway because it was not a court of law and they were allowed to make purely political votes and that is exactly what they did.
Translation: you can't provide any info about my requests so you resorted to ad hominem.
If you aren't honest enough to admit that there are no criminal charges or convictions against Hillary, despite your dislike of her, then you're part of the problem in this country.
I'M SURE YOUR LITTLE BITCHY SNARK KEEPS ANYONE FROM NOTICING YOU HAVE NO RESPONSE TO MY CHALLENGING YOUR ASININE NONSENSE...PER USUAL.
Don't think of it as bitchy snark, grokweenie. I'm just a cat playing with my food before pouncing.
Remember when his "title" under his screen name said #Oathkeeper and #Threeper? You are right -- he IS part of the problem, along with his fellow slackjaws who attacked our Capitol last January.
I do remember. Wonder if the events of 1/6 are why he changed it.