Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
ask his partner who testified that the only threat he faced was from his partner....
Let's hear from Kyle's militia friends then and see what they say.

ask his partner who testified that the only threat he faced was from his partner....
This one is what I was referring to:
and what does that really have to do with it?ExpressLane said:One hit him in the head With a skateboard the other drew a hand gun on him.
it was YOUR post.....do you realize how dumb that makes you look now?So post the video in question. Give me the time mark. Appearance can be deceiving. Few people in the past has been shot because they "appeared" to draw out their guns when they were really cell phones.
I don't need to. You can clearly see them and listen to their testimonies already on Youtube.
I think you're the emotional one here because you just said earlier that those victims were "trying to take his gun" from him, not trying to kill him, like you were trying to say they were earlier.
So you just fucked up your argument for yourself by stating that these guys were trying to disarm him, not kill him, so therefore Kyle wasn't acting in self-defense when he shot those people.
So? Are you trying to make a point here?
and what does that really have to do with it?
it was YOUR post.....do you realize how dumb that makes you look now?
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...lled-rioters-or-looters&p=4747684#post4747684
I suggest you watch the video, for once. you clearly have a colored view of the events and are not objective
Gee, you're harsh. What should Bill Clinton have gotten for sexually harassing and raping women?
His age will be factored in as well as both his actions and the actions of people on both sides of the divide. His friends are facing their own charges...I'm not sure their status or charges.
I suspect Kyle could be looking at 5-15 years then get early parole per the rules.
you're all over the map, boyo.........you must have really been rattled about being shown all of your wrongness
I was curious if you were a politically biased judge.Exactly what Harvey Weinstein got.
Why whatabout to Bill Clinton, though? What does Clinton have to do with this?
that is only your feels, it's not law..........there can be justification, you just don't agree with it
Let's hear from Kyle's militia friends then and see what they say.![]()
You confirmed that he was lying.
You can't tell me the time mark of that guy that "appears" to have a handgun?
So give me a time mark.
I think it'll be 20 to life because his lawyer is shit, and he's going to have Kyle take the stand...I just feel it in my bones that his lawyer thinks the best defense is for the jury to hear it from Kyle's own mouth.
I hope his attorney does that because I would pay to watch Kyle lose it during the cross-examination.
What are you talking about? You just said that Kyle is so desperate that he's looking for a witness who can testify to Kyle's state of mind that evening.
Who would even do that? His "very fine people" won't because the prosecutor will just destroy their credibility.
In order for Kyle to claim self-defense, he has to prove that he felt threatened, which he can't do unless he takes the stand.
I think your boy is going away for life, man....
if there is already a confession, why is there a trial? face it, you don't agree with the laws but can't bring yourself to accept that it is law
Any competent prosecutor can easily tear that apart.
That's the law too, man.
You're all about feelings because your whole argument hinges on Kyle's feelings, specifically his feelings of being threatened.
So what does the law say about that? Well, the law says it's a valid defense if you can prove it...but Kyle won't prove it, so he's searching for someone, anyone, who will.
That desperation is going to backfire...he would be wise to take a plea deal...if he did, then he's probably looking at 15 years...but if he doesn't...game over. He's gone for life.
do you need someone to cut the crusts off your bread as well? try the 2:95 mark
I doubt it as Rittenhouse would not have been charged here or anywhere when right to carry is the law
wishful thinking again![]()