so it is okay for a 17 year old to illegally carry a gun to a protest and shoot two unarmed people to death who come near him.
I don't think you can post without looking like a shrill, triggered liar. So is it okay for violent thugs to burn and loot a city?
The people shot attacked him. ONE of them, who survived, admitted he pointed a loaded handgun at Kyle. One of the deceased had beat him with a skateboard, the other stomped on him. Now I know in dishonest asshole land where you wallow it is okay to attack young white males, but the rest of the world thinks that is moronic.
I want to know why dipshits like this prosecutor and the media think that someone walking with a scary looking weapon should be insulted, threatened and attacked.
I want to know why dipshits like this prosecutor and the media think that citizens don't have the right to protect themselves and their property when the city and it's police force refuse to protect them.
Any answers that aren't shrill, triggered, stupid or false?

no one else was shot that night, protests everywhere, except where this chickenshit punk ass trigger happy coward was.
That would be because no one else was attacked by triggered, violent loons trying to destroy the city. Were you born a moron? Or just work hard at looking like one.
