The Supreme Court faces an existential crisis of legitimacy

A mother’s rights are morally equivalent to a child’s right to life.

Neither supersedes the other.
 
Lionfish said:
Dear Mr. Mom jeans,
country-jpg.872720
Click to expand...

:laugh: Wrap your mullet back into your bike helmet and go drink another $2 beer, white trash.
 
Earl said:
Someone has learned a new word...”scatological.”

You’re welcome.
Click to expand...

I already knew that word, but it's more your speed than mine. Since you are literal scat, I'm sure you spend all of your time in that space.
 
Diesel said:
BECAUSE WOMEN ARE ALLOWED TO MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR OWN BODIES

YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE
Click to expand...

should they be free from the consequences of their decisions, good or bad? because it is a womans choice to engage in sex KNOWING that pregnancy is a possibility..........it's a massive responsibility, but there it is......BOOM!!!! the more you know
 
SmarterthanYou said:
should they be free from the consequences of their decisions, good or bad? because it is a womans choice to engage in sex KNOWING that pregnancy is a possibility..........it's a massive responsibility, but there it is......BOOM!!!! the more you know
Click to expand...

Women are allowed to have sex, too. I know that aggravates you to death.
 
If you do not believe in abortion, then do not have one. The Dems will not force you to.
If you are really pro-birth, then you should help create an enormous fund to pay for the feeding, education, and care of a kid born to parents who cannot afford one. Your rules stop at birth. You force a person who cannot afford a kid, was raped, or cannot handle it, then walk away. You have freedom of choice for other people's lives. Then assume some responsibility for the lifetime obligations.
 
Nordberg said:
If you do not believe in abortion, then do not have one. The Dems will not force you to.
If you are really pro-birth, then you should help create an enormous fund to pay for the feeding, education, and care of a kid born to parents who cannot afford one. Your rules stop at birth. You force a person who cannot afford a kid, was raped, or cannot handle it, then walk away. You have freedom of choice for other people's lives. Then assume some responsibility for the lifetime obligations.
Click to expand...

Agree. Shows the right is anti-life and anti-women.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
should they be free from the consequences of their decisions, good or bad? because it is a womans choice to engage in sex KNOWING that pregnancy is a possibility..........it's a massive responsibility, but there it is......BOOM!!!! the more you know
Click to expand...

Same for the man but the Republicans were never big on deadbeat dad laws. Seems to reason since the current crop of Republicans seem to favor fucking underage females.

If Trump is elected, do you think he'd change the laws to 14? Not 12, of course. Jeffrey liked them "young", but current Republican leaders know that "girls have to bleed before it's moral to fuck them".
 
BidenPresident said:
Agree. Shows the right is anti-life and anti-women.
Click to expand...

Certainly anti-women. The whole abortion thing is religious, not secular. It's irrational to deny abortion on the claim "every life is sacred" then abandon the child completely after birth until they are old enough to prosecute.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top