BidenPresident
Verified User
Then you read very little, and most nonsense. But it is a good excuse to avoid making an even more stupid comment for which you have no response.
buh bye
Then you read very little, and most nonsense. But it is a good excuse to avoid making an even more stupid comment for which you have no response.
Not strange at all. Even in the animal kingdom it is the female that controls the sex.
For it to be called a religious ceremony, yes. A civil ceremony then who cares.
But why do you oppose any form of Christianity?
That control used to be called "abstinence", a term lost in the 60's with the feminist movement.
doesn't the government have a financial obligation to pay to the costs of raising a child?
For it to be called a religious ceremony, yes. A civil ceremony then who cares.
But why do you oppose any form of Christianity?
Don't you think that should be up to the individual church and/or pastor, whether to allow a gay couple to be wed in their church? Why do you think you or anyone else should have a say in it, including the government?
I don't really care about any of the Religious Cults. As long as they don't attempt to put their Religious Quackery on everyone else. No one is attempting to 'regulate' YOUR life. Does that make sense?
Do you believe that men should also practice abstinence, or is that just for women?
The animal kingdom doesn't have contract law...
Apparently, Atheist quacks are too stupid to know how to prevent pregnancies.![]()
No, it is for both sexes. However, it is also a genetic reality that the sex drive is stronger in the male. Then there is the idea of which gender was intended to teach children matters like spirituality, manners, etc. But the roles that God intended were long ago discarded by so-called "christians" in favor of materialism. Thus we wind up with leaders like trump, and the Republicans.
Considering the number of attacks on Christianity by Atheists in the Courts, makes no sense at all.
The thing I find the most puzzling is how many women, minorities mostly but not exclusively, resort to having multiple abortions.
Another righty attacking women for getting pregnant. It is about judging them in the end.
doesn't the government have a financial obligation to pay to the costs of raising a child?
Women just need to keep their legs together.
It's interesting that Evince is advocating for the widescale taking of the lives of Black babies. Blacks are 13.4% of the total population of the US but represent 38% of all abortions in the US.
if she controlled it, she would not become pregnant before she wanted to. its not the kids fault but you want him or her to die for the mother's inability to control her sexual urges.
but fear not, the SC is about to turn it back over to the voters in each state.
The thing I find the most puzzling is how many women, minorities mostly but not exclusively, resort to having multiple abortions.