Saw that coming, Trumpers destroy constitution.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I’m all for it. Gives more power to individual states and less to the federal gubmint .
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I didn't even know Newsome was a Trumper.......things change fast around here.....
So you are on with States violating your constitutional rights?
The challenge to abortion does not involve a Constitutional right to kill the unborn.
The Second Amendment does involve a specific right...gun ownership.
The Communist governor of California has no case. The Supremacy clause...
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
The Second Amendment does involve a specific right...gun ownership.
The Communist governor of California has no case. The Supremacy clause...
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you sound like you don't realize that they've been going around constitutional rights for almost a century.........where you been?
for a lawyer you dont know a damn thing about the Constitution.
'abortion rights" is an implied power found by SCOTUS / "what SCOTUS gives, SCOTUS can take away"
STOP YOUR LYING BABYKILLER.
THERE IS NO "CONSITUTIONAL RIGHT" TO ABORTION.
ROE v WADE "CREATED" A NON-EXISTENT "RIGHT".
Melchizedek = Michael
Verified User
Jan 6 Trump committed treason
So you do not believe we have a constitutional right to make personal medical decisions?
APPARENTLY NOT, AS YOU AND YOURS KEEP TRYING TO FORCE AMERICANS TO DO YOUR BIDDING ON COVID VACCINES, IGNORING THEIR " right to make personal medical decisions?"
ABORTION DIRECTLY AFFECTS MORE THAN THE WOAMN'S LIFE...THERE IS ANOTHER LIFE INVOLVED.
PLEASE CITE THE CONSTITUTIONAL WORDING ALLOWING THE KILLING OF THE UNBORN.
1. doesn't matter what I believe -what matters is SCOTUS interpretation.
2. you are MISSING THE FACT vaxxing mandates are "personal medical decisions" -
..(why are you in favor of a vaxx mandates that violate "personal medical decisions
but abortion personal medical decisions are different?)
3. even turning back regulatory power to states doesn't mean one doesn't get to decide
there are simply regs to that personal autonomy
Wrong. Abortion is in the privacy clause of the constitution. You rightys want the government way into girls' lives. You want to monitor a girl who get pregnant. If she miscarriages and cannot prove it, it is jail for her. And a bounty on anyone who assists her or appears to. Playing the people against each other for fun and profit. What a great idea. A police state , just for girls, and with police deep into a girls life.
Into the Night
Verified User
Ignoring the PLCAA law now?
No. States cannot use lawsuits like this to effectively ban guns. Of course, the SOTC isn't a State of the Union anymore.
Into the Night
Verified User
The 2nd amendment also applies to the States. This was the reason Congress passed the PLCAA law back in 2005. Apparently Jarod never got the memo.
Into the Night
Verified User
How? Be specific.
Into the Night
Verified User
There is no right to murder privately.
What makes you think I support vaccine mandates.?
So you don’t agree that we have a right to privacy from the government about our personal medical decisions?
Lots of places in America aren’t anymore. Portland, CHAZ, even the Kenosha, WI DA office is oblivious to the constitution.
I’m all for states’ rights. The more control to individual states, the less to the federal government the better.
Even if guns were legal in California why would any sane person want to live there?
Last edited: