Fox will shell out over a billion dollars, Dominion defamation suit given green light

the trial will now take place, the motion to dismiss would have closed the case with no trial. What you libs need to fear is the truth about the election coming out in this trial. This is not a win for you dim libs.

You're going to be so surprised, aren't you? lol
 
stand by, the truth is coming. Biden did not win in 2020. post all the talking points your masters give you, you cannot overcome the truth, and its coming.

EDQIlgj.jpg
 
I've noticed that few, if any, of the Reichwing claims of fraud come with verification from credible sources. You're right; they hear something that resonates with their bias, and they dutifully repeat it.

the videos of fake ballots being pulled from under a table after a fake water main break is not evidence? its on tape, its hard evidence. More votes than voters in several states is not evidence? eye witness testimony it witnessing vote fraud is not evidence? NO, there is plenty of hard evidence and it has been suppressed by the corrupt media and the corrupt deep state until now.
 
Fox News loses bid to dismiss Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Fox News Network on Thursday lost an effort to dismiss a $1.6 billion lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems Inc, a voting machine company that says the television network defamed it by amplifying conspiracy theories about its technology.

In a written ruling, Delaware court judge Eric Davis said Dominion had sufficiently alleged it was defamed by Fox News' election coverage and the case should proceed toward trial.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...defamation-lawsuit/ar-AARTqX3?ocid=uxbndlbing


hit Rupert where it hurts mo$t

Right or wrong?

I highly doubt Fox will end up paying that much.

These things seem to almost always get reduced on appeal.
 
the videos of fake ballots being pulled from under a table after a fake water main break is not evidence? its on tape, its hard evidence. More votes than voters in several states is not evidence? eye witness testimony it witnessing vote fraud is not evidence? NO, there is plenty of hard evidence and it has been suppressed by the corrupt media and the corrupt deep state until now.

Lies. Debunked b.s.

https://www.gpb.org/news/2021/10/12...nd-evidence-of-counterfeit-ballots-in-georgia
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...t-hasnt-found-30-000-fake-ballots/5253184001/
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9902302706
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...laim-ballots-error-fulton-county-ga-unproven/
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...as-not-filled-with-fake-ballots-idUSKBN29B23D

All credible sources, retrieved in less than one minute.

Your sources for your laughable nonsense? lol
 
I wish someone could find a way to sue the rest of the MSM for their INCREDIBLE bias on reporting Covid-19.
Especially during the first 6 months of the 'pandemic'.
Deliberately pushing the government line so as to panic people to stay in their homes and watch more Cable news.
Rarely reporting news in a balanced fashion.
Which worked, BTW:

'From March 16-20, Fox News saw its ratings climb 89 percent over the same time last year, to 881,000 primetime viewers per day ages 25-54, while CNN was up 193 percent to 790,000 and MSNBC climbed 56 percent to 570,000, according to Nielsen Media Research. The networks declined to comment on the growth.'
https://www.newsweek.com/ratings-skyrocket-cable-news-amid-wall-wall-coronavirus-coverage-1493836

BTW - all MSM are beyond useless.
If you get your news from them exclusively - including Fox?

You have NO idea what is really going on in the world.
 
Last edited:
Right or wrong?

I highly doubt Fox will end up paying that much.

These things seem to almost always get reduced on appeal.

Most likely they will settle out of court for less. The only things up in the air are will the amount be revealed, and will the settlement include a company statement from Fox admitting wrong-doing.
 
I wish someone could find a way to sue the rest of the MSM for their INCREDIBLE bias on reporting Covid-19.
Deliberately pushing the government line so as to panic people to stay in their homes and watch more Cable news.
Which worked, BTW:

'From March 16-20, Fox News saw its ratings climb 89 percent over the same time last year, to 881,000 primetime viewers per day ages 25-54, while CNN was up 193 percent to 790,000 and MSNBC climbed 56 percent to 570,000, according to Nielsen Media Research. The networks declined to comment on the growth.'
https://www.newsweek.com/ratings-skyrocket-cable-news-amid-wall-wall-coronavirus-coverage-1493836

BTW - all MSM are beyond useless.
If you get your news from them exclusively - including Fox?

You have NO idea what is really going on in the world.

So all those superspreader events were "fake news"? :laugh:

If you want to know what's going on in the world, you'll need to look at something other than just American news. A good illustration of why this is important is shown by all the RW chimps here jumping up and down and screeching about inflation, including gas prices. A quick look at news from the rest of the planet quickly shows us that the price hikes aren't confined to just the United States -- inflation is currently a GLOBAL phenomenon.
 
So all those superspreader events were "fake news"? :laugh:

If you want to know what's going on in the world, you'll need to look at something other than just American news. A good illustration of why this is important is shown by all the RW chimps here jumping up and down and screeching about inflation, including gas prices. A quick look at news from the rest of the planet quickly shows us that the price hikes aren't confined to just the United States -- inflation is currently a GLOBAL phenomenon.

What super spreader events, Sturgis was not that type of event with 100k+ attending a rally in a town of <10,000
 
So all those superspreader events were "fake news"? :laugh:

If you want to know what's going on in the world, you'll need to look at something other than just American news. A good illustration of why this is important is shown by all the RW chimps here jumping up and down and screeching about inflation, including gas prices. A quick look at news from the rest of the planet quickly shows us that the price hikes aren't confined to just the United States -- inflation is currently a GLOBAL phenomenon.

PURE strawman, right there.

Did I say that?
Did I say EVERYTHING they reported was wrong?
No.

I guess I was not clear enough.

I said/meant that the MSM pushed the narrative that the government was right to lockdown.
They barely even mentioned the possibilities of the huge harm lockdowns did.
And they rarely interviewed anyone who went against the government line.

And they practically called Fauci a 'hero'.


But alright?

Please show me links to where the MSM (not FOX) took a completely, balanced approach to reporting COVID-19 during the spring and summer of 2020?
 
Please show me links to where the MSM (not FOX) took a completely, balanced approach to reporting COVID-19 during the spring and summer of 2020?

Why? Do your own homework. Prove what you say, don't ask me to do it for you.

BTW, you do know what "strawman" in debate parlance is, right? You aren't using it correctly here.
 

sorry, but not one of those is a credible source, but post more propaganda lies, post em and prove your ignorance. But thats not really necessary since everyone on this silly message board already knows that you are a lying partisan hack with zero credibility, but you are good are repeating the latest dem talking point lies, gotta give you that.
 
Why? Do your own homework. Prove what you say, don't ask me to do it for you.

BTW, you do know what "strawman" in debate parlance is, right? You aren't using it correctly here.

Lady?

I posted a link to evidence that the MSM ratings went to Pluto during the lockdowns.

All you did is post a strawman that deliberately misrepresented what I typed.
That means YOU are the one whom should back it up.


So if I call you a slut?
And you say 'prove it'?
I can just say 'no...you prove you are not?'
Riiiiight.

You made the accusation against me?
It is up to YOU to prove it.

And since you cannot.
That means it was nothing but a strawman.
BY DEFINITION.
https://effectiviology.com/straw-man-arguments-recognize-counter-use/

Have a nice day.
 
Back
Top