There Is No Question That Babbitt Was About To Commit Murder

T. A. Gardner said:
1r504h.jpg
Click to expand...
LOL. Now I see why you post the nonsense you do.

Babbitt was a lunatic who was about to commit murder. You cannot get around that.
 
Grokmaster said:
BECAUSE SHE GOT PISSED AT HER BOYFRIEND, MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AGO, ...SHE PLANNED TO MURDER SOMEONE ON JAN 6 ?? WITH NO WEAPON, AT THAT?


DO YOU EVEN REALIZE WHAT AN AIRHEADED IDIOT YOU ARE????


THE "TEACHER".... :laugh:
Click to expand...
Who said she was pissed at her boyfriend?
 
Althea said:
LOL. Now I see why you post the nonsense you do.

Babbitt was a lunatic who was about to commit murder. You cannot get around that.
Click to expand...

Yes I can. Babbitt may be an idiot, but an unarmed woman who could have easily been stopped--without shooting her--by any one of a number of police present and within feet of her could have done so. Instead, you have an idiot supervisor on the Capitol Police that completely ignored his use of force rules shooting her in the back. He essentially committed murder, while you have zero proof that even as possibly "lunatic" Babbitt might have been that she was intent on murdering anyone.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yes I can. Babbitt may be an idiot, but an unarmed woman who could have easily been stopped--without shooting her--by any one of a number of police present and within feet of her could have done so. Instead, you have an idiot supervisor on the Capitol Police that completely ignored his use of force rules shooting her in the back. He essentially committed murder, while you have zero proof that even as possibly "lunatic" Babbitt might have been that she was intent on murdering anyone.
Click to expand...

You seem not to understand that it isn't about her.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yes I can. Babbitt may be an idiot, but an unarmed woman who could have easily been stopped--without shooting her--by any one of a number of police present and within feet of her could have done so. Instead, you have an idiot supervisor on the Capitol Police that completely ignored his use of force rules shooting her in the back. He essentially committed murder, while you have zero proof that even as possibly "lunatic" Babbitt might have been that she was intent on murdering anyone.
Click to expand...

She violently broke into the building and rooms. She deserved to be killed. They all did.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yes I can. Babbitt may be an idiot, but an unarmed woman who could have easily been stopped--without shooting her--by any one of a number of police present and within feet of her could have done so. Instead, you have an idiot supervisor on the Capitol Police that completely ignored his use of force rules shooting her in the back. He essentially committed murder, while you have zero proof that even as possibly "lunatic" Babbitt might have been that she was intent on murdering anyone.
Click to expand...
Wrong. If she was successful in breaching that window, hundreds of her fellow murderers would have swamped the handful of heroes.

They had no way of knowing she wasn't armed. Putting her down like a dog bought crucial time for our nation's leaders to make it to safety.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Then what is it about? Babbitt wasn't about to commit murder, while the 1/6 riot wasn't an "insurrection."
Click to expand...

It is about the mob threatening them. Also I have defined "insurrection" for you. Did you miss it or did you ignore it on purpose? I suspect the latter.
 
BidenPresident said:
She violently broke into the building and rooms. She deserved to be killed. They all did.
Click to expand...

How fascist of you. Simply randomly killing any criminal you deem is one for whatever reason you choose. No trial, no evidence, no jury, just shoot 'em all... That is the essence of every evil totalitarian dictatorship in history.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
How fascist of you. Simply randomly killing any criminal you deem is one for whatever reason you choose. No trial, no evidence, no jury, just shoot 'em all... That is the essence of every evil totalitarian dictatorship in history.
Click to expand...

And yet you have no problem if the person is a BLM/Antifa member. Go figure.
 
BidenPresident said:
the irony of these fascists is that they demand democratic rights of a fair trial. Lots of countries would have executed them by now.
Click to expand...
If they were black, there would still be blood on the steps of the Capitol.

Let's not forget what it looked like when BLM marched on Washington:

wRL6pcr.jpg
 
T. A. Gardner said:
How fascist of you. Simply randomly killing any criminal you deem is one for whatever reason you choose. No trial, no evidence, no jury, just shoot 'em all... That is the essence of every evil totalitarian dictatorship in history.
Click to expand...
It was not a random criminal. It was the leader of a pack of murderers who were chanting 'Hang Mike Pence'.

Get your facts straight, and stop 'stretching the truth' ;)
 
a person that has never killed a person before is without question going to kill a person because of how they acted when dealing with extramarital affairs ?

Althea - how short is your bus exactly?
 
Althea said:
It was not a random criminal. It was the leader of a pack of murderers who were chanting 'Hang Mike Pence'.

Get your facts straight, and stop 'stretching the truth' ;)
Click to expand...

So now you're saying she was the leader of a pack of murderers? Damn girl, get your facts straight :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top