Scandalous new proof utterly debunks the Russia hoax, let's review the Democrat lies

ExpressLane said:
Are you using a free government crack pipe?
Click to expand...

200.webp
 
LV426 said:
You're a goddamn fuckin liar who banks on people not holding the shit you say to scrutiny.
Click to expand...

100.webp


We have another one who apparently forgot their meds. :laugh:

LV426 said:
The motion said that a tech company executive gathered lookups, which are not substantive communications such as emails and texts.
Click to expand...

And? :dunno:

Democrats being caught hiring scam-artists to spy on and plant fake evidence of Russian collusion is impacted HOW, exactly, by bringing up which form of electronic communications were involved?

giphy.webp


LV426 said:
So you're lying to everyone here, either because you're a malicious actor, or a brain-dead barnyard animal.
Click to expand...

Nothing you've brought up indicates anything like that. :palm:

Nice IQ. :rofl2:
 
archives said:
Nothing new here, pretty much exactly what one could hear turning on AM radio or Fox any time of the day
Click to expand...

-Your sources knowingly lied to misrepresent Hillary-funded fabrications and misinformation as legitimate FBI evidence to frame a sitting U.S. president as a secret Russian agent. It completely fell apart under scrutiny, the source is now under arrest, and your tabloid trash "news" sources are now being forced to go back and retract their claims and rewrite their articles.

-Your sources were caught lyingabout President Trump telling people to inject Lysol.

-Your sources deliberately lied to ruin the life of a child with smear campaigns, slander, and death threats for wearing a MAGA hat while politely smiling at a deranged left-wing hysteric who got in his face. They were forced to pay a settlement for their lies.

-Your sources outright lied about a drug that had been proven safe and effective against coronaviruses for 50 years straight (Hydroxchloroquine) suddenly somehow being "untested" and "dangerous." They destroyed the lives of experts who proved them wrong and killed thousands of people to to push a partisan agenda. They even reversed course and finally admitted what the science had shown all along once they were using it to force through mail-in voting.

-Your sources intentionally lied to misrepresent President Trump's acknowledgement that most Americans opposed the left's ignorant Neanderthal cult practice of tearing down art, history, and monuments for not being "woke" enough...as him calling white supremacists "very fine people."

-Your sources knew for a fact that Roy Moore was not a pedophile, but deliberately lied about him being one anyway to steal an election for Democrats.

-Your sources intentionally lied to ruin the life of a child for not letting Antifa terrorists murder him. Every charge the scandalously corrupt Democrat District Attorney could fabricate to criminalize self-defense was unanimously laughed out of court.

-Your sources relentlessly lied their corrupt asses off to smear Kavanaugh as a gang rapist.

-Your sources blatantly lied about President Trump having protesters gassed so he could do a photo op in front of a church. The IG report completely debunked this widely repeated Democrat falsehood.

-Your sources falsely propped up the now thoroughly debunked Jussie Smollett hoax.

-Your sources dishonestly scaremongered people into thinking that repealing Obama's illegal, innovation-stifling Internet takeover ('Net Neutrality') was "hastening the death of the Internet" and blatantly lied with sleazy, wildly inaccurate headlines such as "So long to the Internet." The repeal happened, and nothing about the Internet changed at all.

-Your sources straight-up lied to ruin the lives of a Missouri couple for holding off violent BLM terrorists once they had already broken onto their property, destroyed things, and used lynch mob tactics to intimidate them out of their rights for being white. The scandalously corrupt Democrat prosecutor had to be removed from the case and the governor had to get involved and pardon the completely innocent couple to undo this egregious abuse of power.

-Your sources lied to downplay Biden bragging on video about blackmailing the Ukraine into firing the prosecutor in his son's corruption investigation, and then lied to stage an impeachment witch hunt against President Trump for trying to investigate Biden's already proven corruption. The witch hunt naturally failed.

Not only did your sources invent gossipy fact-free nonsense to persecute imaginary Trump corruption while ignoring actual, proven Biden corruption, but they also deceptively edited video to smear people, lied by only "fact-checking" conservatives, contradicted years of their own reporting showing that Ukraine had plotted against Trump, and were caught in 75 separate lies.

-Your sources endlessly lied about the police to falsely demonize and defund them, while also lying about defunding them, and then lied to deny the direct cause-and-effect relationship between Democrats releasing criminals, mass murderers, and terrorists, legalizing theft, and lowering penalties for murdering police officers...and the 100% preventable nationwide crime epidemic that naturally, unmistakably resulted.

-Your sources lie to conceal Democrat-incited hate crimes made possible by Democrats repeatedly releasing violent career criminals.

-Your sources followed the lead of Biden and Obama's corrupt DHS in lying to smear peaceful Tea Party protesters as terrorists who were at war with America for preferring fiscal sanity, then reversed course and lied about hundreds of violent Democrat terrorist attacks being "peaceful protests," then lied about one single non-violent act of trespassing where elderly people took selfies in the Capitol (apparently staged by the FBI) as some Pearl Harbor-level terrorist insurrection.

-Your sources lied with more than 40 separate scaremongering anti-science global warming doomsday predictions that all spectacularly failed to ever materialize.

-Your sources used obscenely dishonest, discredited, and debunked SPLC propaganda to prop up absurd false narratives smearing innocent people and suppressing evidence of Democrat bigotry and extremism.

-Your sources rushed in and blatantly lied to misrepresent video evidence of Planned Parenthood selling murdered baby parts for profit as "deceptively edited," repeating the outright lie ad nauseum until the bombshell scandal was drowned out by a blur of smear campaign noise.

-Your sources lied to smear President Trump as putting kids in cages at the border (you also get separated from your kids when you bring them to bank robberies or other crimes), deliberately misrepresenting an Obama policy as Trump's.

-Your sources intentionally lied to smear a temporary pause in importing un-vettable terror state "refugees" as a "Muslim ban."

-Your sources deliberately lied to make President Trump look like he mocked a disabled reporter based on a mannerism that he uses to describe everyone he criticizes.

-Your sources flat-out lied about President Trump calling immigrants "animals" when he was unmistakably clearly referring to violent foreign gangs instead.

-Your sources blatantly lied about Obama's scandal-plagued administration being "scandal-free."

-Your sources willfully misinformed the public into believing that you could keep your doctor and insurance under Obamacare, despite all the evidence showing the opposite.

-Your sources lied to misinform people into thinking that Obamacare would never be used to fund abortions or health care for illegal immigrants. They even smeared conservatives as uncivilized and called for them to be punished for correctly calling that an outright lie. Both happened, exactly as your sources said they never would.

-Your sources were caught lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi eagle symbol, lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi triangle symbol, and lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi anthem?

-Your sources invented a flat-out lie about President Trump calling soldiers "losers" and "suckers" based on literally zero evidence, from an anonymous source (of course), while all 21 witnesses who were in the room at the time, including never-Trumper John Bolton, unanimously agree that nothing like that ever happen.

-Your sources lied about President Trump ignoring Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers. All the evidence shows that President Trump was never briefed. Your sources literally just made the entire thing up out of thin air.

My sources were proven right, yours lied. Every. Single. Time.

This diversionary "attack the source" fallacy is designed to avoid having to discuss whether or not the claim is true by stigmatizing sources that bring up any other side of the story, because their evidence is unassailable and devastating.

Next bullshit avoidance tactic please. :cool:
 
Thaddeus Martel said:
e have another one who apparently forgot their meds.
Click to expand...

You post horseshit on JPP because you know there's no accountability here...so you abuse that in bad faith.


And?
Click to expand...

Annnnnnnd that means there's nothing illegal about what happened.


Democrats being caught hiring scam-artists to spy on and plant fake evidence of Russian collusion is impacted HOW, exactly, by bringing up which form of electronic communications were involved?
Click to expand...

That is not what Durham said in his filing.

So you either didn't read Durham's filing, and are lying to cover for your laziness, or you did read Durham's filing, and are lying to cover for your bad faith.

Either way, you're a liar.
 
Dark Soul said:
Here it is like 20 down from the most talked about thread on this forum. And, so predictable, no serious rebuttal to this scandal from JPP libs. They are desperately trying to ignore it. We knew about this five years ago, the libs scoffed and laughed, and now here is the smoking gun. It's much bigger than WaterGate. This is Fucking Huge. Not just an indictment of Clinton, but also the highest levels of the FBI.

:kipyes:
Click to expand...

And DNC....
 
Thaddeus Martel said:
We now have even more hard evidence that it is Democrats who are the threat to "our democracy."

Not that they hadn't already made that clear by:

-helping illegal immigrants break into our country by the millions and illegally vote,

-doxing, censoring, and canceling people who disprove their narratives, and burning down cities while protecting terrorists and persecuting anyone who fights back,

-protecting voter fraud,

-incessantly trying to overthrow elections they lose with hoaxes and coup attempts,

-staging 1/6,

-weaponizing government agencies to destroy and silence their opponents,

-shutting down four Democrat-run battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and reopening hours later with a literally mathematically impossible complete reversal in the results.

But I digress...

We already had proof positive that Democrats doctored fake evidence, lied to a federal judge, and illegally spied on a sitting U.S. president to overthrow an election they lost (with the news media laundering their made-up evidence to make it look like it came from DOJ and FBI), but now that it's an irrefutable fact, let's review all the lies your "legitimate, not tabloid trash at all" news sources told you and ask ourselves...

...How many times must Democrats be humiliated by unassailable proof that their sources constantly lie to them and deliberately misinform them into committing heinous betrayals of everything this country stands for (like this un-American attack on 'our democracy') before they comprehend that perhaps they should re-evaluate their poisonous, deranged extremist worldview and the seditious traitors who manipulate them into betraying their country at every turn?

View attachment 21912

1) "There’s no real evidence," she said. "This is ’60 Minutes.’ We can’t put on things we can’t verify."

There was unmistakable proof documenting the spying as far back as FOUR YEARS AGO. Our corrupt, biased news media, who were in on the coup, simply talked right past it like it wasn't being laid directly in their laps.

Putting on "things we can't verify" is ALL the news media appear to do.

2) "Nothing happens and they just move on to the next conspiracy theory," Lemon said to Cuomo during a handover. "It is never going to end and guess what? People who want to believe that BS are going to believe it."

Projection much? Again, now we have even more proof that it is DEMOCRATS who move from one BS conspiracy theory to the next with zero accountability. Everything Democrats assert turns out to be a bold-faced, intentional, pot-calling-the-kettle-black lie.

3) In an October 2021 episode of MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," host Rachel Maddow suggested the intention behind efforts to probe the investigation was always to re-route the investigation away from Trump himself. "It’s a boomerang," she said. "Because it’s apparently an ongoing, concerted Republican and pro-Trump project to try to turn the investigation of the Russia scandal into some kind of scandal itself."

Deflecting about deflecting. Sane people proving that the most ludicrous Democrat conspiracy theory of all time was a staged frame job from the beginning is apparently somehow THEM being the conspiracy theorists.

Got to appreciate the "next level" asinine lunatic extremism of Rachel Maddow. :laugh:

'60 Minutes,' CNN, MSNBC, downplayed, criticized Durham probe of Russia investigation

And as always, the moment some devastating bombshell evidence emerges proving that everything Democrats have spent YEARS building their entire lie-based worldview on was a known, deliberate falsehood from the beginning...our "enemy of the American people" news media, who were literally intentional co-conspirators in this gross act of treason, respond by imposing a total media blackout and silencing anyone who points it out.

View attachment 21913

And the Democrat terrorist cult burns more books and cheers.

For the record, even Democrats now want Hillary investigated for outright treason at this point, even according to their own bullshit polling pseudo-science.
Click to expand...

Brilliant OP. I see you've got the leftdrones all in a tizzy

Cannot refute a WORD of your posts, just launch sophomoric ad homs....as usual.

Great job!! Fun to watch you pimp-slapping the dullards !!



giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The only thing smoking are the people that think Durham's filing is evidence of any criminal activity by Clinton or her campaign.
Durham makes no such claim and he doesn't make that claim for a very real reason. It would be a violation of his prosecutorial duties to claim a crime when he has no evidence.
Click to expand...

Still no serious response.
 
BartenderElite said:
Conservatives have forever ceded honesty as any kind of issue.

Just a reminder.
Click to expand...

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
 
Port Tack said:
there is no proof in right wing bullshit cites like were posted.
Click to expand...

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Proving, once again, fat boy, why you are a lying piece of shit who people will applaud when you go down.

Now whine I threatened you and your family. LOL
Click to expand...

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.

in·fan·tile
(ĭn′fən-tīl′, -tĭl)
adj.
Displaying or suggesting a lack of maturity; childish: infantile behavior; an infantile remark.
 
Thaddeus Martel said:
The arrest of the man behind the phony dossier underscores the many lies of the Russia hoax
Click to expand...
You start off with something that doesn't support your claim. Danchenko provided some of the information that was included in the Steele dossier. He was not the only source of information. Nor was the Steele dossier the source for the FBI investigation into Trump/Russia ties. Crossfire Hurricane began because the FBI was contacted by a foreign country when a Trump campaign worker bragged to a diplomat that Russia had information damaging to Clinton. Unless you are claiming the conviction of Papadopoulos is the arrest of who started it, your claim is not accurate. It is overblown hyperbole at least if not out right lying.
Crossfire Hurricane started in July of 2016.
Steele didn't meet with the FBI until October of 2016. (p 938, Senate report)

WaPo walkback: Paper yanks chunks of stories based on discredited Steele dossier
Click to expand...
That points to stories already retracted almost 4 months ago. You claimed articles are in the process of being retracted. What stories are you talking about or are you avoiding give support for your claim?

Which is a really long way of saying "found nothing." Incoming administrations can be found on the record talking to EVERY foreign government. There is nothing even remotely unusual or controversial about this. This is literally just Democrats pretending that something ordinary is something scandalous without a single shred of evidence.
Click to expand...
Hmm.. It seems you have decided to completely ignore what was reported in both the Mueller report and in the Senate report.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf
Just reading the Senate report on Manafort clearly disputes your claim they found nothing. Trump was not the incoming administration until after the election.

:bs:


A really long way of saying "couldn't find evidence of guilt." :nono:
Click to expand...
It seems you don't quite understand the difference between enough evidence to convict in a court of law vs no evidence. If we follow your argument here then Hillary did nothing wrong with her server or in deleting her emails because the FBI "couldn't find evidence of guilt." Your argument is nonsense. No evidence of a crime doesn't mean that Russia didn't help Trump just as no evidence of a crime means Hillary's personal server was a great idea. Instead we have some pretty good evidence based on investigations that Russia helped Trump's election and the Trump campaign was fine with accepting that help.


Mueller literally tortured people and threatened to destroy the lives of their families if they didn't make false confessions. Mueller saying something in no way indicates that it is true. He repeatedly proved himself to be an obscenely corrupt and biased establishment hack. All that matters is what he can prove, which is literally nothing, because it was a staged hoax, which we have irrefutable proof of.
Click to expand...
Mueller literally tortured people? Do you know what the word "literally" means? Please provide your evidence of Mueller literally torturing anyone. Did he waterboard someone? Pull out their fingernails? It seems you can't dispute anything Mueller said so you just attack him personally. ROFLMAO. You do like to show how ignorant you are. Mueller's report has been verified in several ways. The Senate report finds many of the same facts to be true. Courts have found the facts to be true. Was Manafort convicted by a court?

How about we just deal with your first five responses and then move onto your other 50 once those are addressed, since you are apparently one of these people who tries to compensate for having no real counterpoints by injecting quantity-over-quality mountains of blather to outtalk your opponents instead of refuting them?
Click to expand...
Let me know when you are going to dispute anything I say with actual facts. Your conspiracy bullshit and attacks on Mueller aren't facts. They are simply proof you don't have any actual facts to support your claims.

So far you have not provided any support for the following:

1. )The arrest of someone that was the source of the Russian collusion conspiracy. There were multiple sources that lead people to claim Russian collusion, including Trump himself telling Russia to hack Hillary. There is no evidence that Trump was conspiring with Russia but there is a lot of evidence of the Russian helping to elect Trump.

2.) You have provided no evidence that Trump was spied on at any time.
3.) You have provided no evidence that the Democrats were behind 1/6.
4.) You have provide no evidence of your math that you claim proves that the election could have happened the way it did.
5.) You have provided no evidence that Durham claimed Trump was spied. In fact Durham clearly doesn't claim that.
 
Last edited:
The Mueller report proved beyond a doubt Trump and his crime family worked hand in glove with the Ruskies.........everyone knows it including the Slobfather
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top