Schools nationwide are quietly removing books from their libraries

BidenPresident said:
Makes you a troll.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

'troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument'
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll

Having an off-shoot discussion within a thread is NOT 'trolling'.
Yeah...like you have NEVER, EVER typed a post that had little/nothing to do with the OP.
:laugh:

I STRONGLY suggest you learn what words mean BEFORE you use them.
That way - you will look more 'informed'.

Good day.
 
McRocket said:
Wrong.

'troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument'
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll

Having an off-shoot discussion within a thread is NOT 'trolling'.
Yeah...like you have NEVER, EVER typed a post that had little/nothing to do with the OP.
:laugh:

I STRONGLY suggest you learn what words mean BEFORE you use them.
That way - you will look more 'informed'.

Good day.
Click to expand...

bye troll
 
BidenPresident said:
bye troll
Click to expand...

Have you ever, typed a post that was not 100% relevant to the thread title?

Yes or no, please?

If the answer is 'yes' (which it is - as calling me a 'troll' has NOTHING to do with the thread OP. It is an ad hominem.)?

Then I guess - by your standards - you are a troll as well.
 
BidenPresident said:
School book bans are soaring: Although the vast majority of challenges go unreported, the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom counted 330 incidents of book censorship in just the three months from September to November 2021 — marking the highest rate since the association began tracking the issue in 1990.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/03/22/school-librarian-book-bans-challenges/
Click to expand...

When my kids were young I always looked at the books that they brought home on our once-a-week visits to the public library, as well as the books borrowed from the school library. If I had seen something I was concerned about, I would have read it to myself first. If it contained something I felt inappropriate, I would have returned it, and explained why if asked. Why should I think that I have the right to deprive some other parent/kid from reading a book that *I* didn't approve of?

Maybe these cancel culture conjob "parents" should be paying more attention to their own parenting and quit worrying that someone else might read something they don't like.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
When my kids were young I always looked at the books that they brought home on our once-a-week visits to the public library, as well as the books borrowed from the school library. If I had seen something I was concerned about, I would have read it to myself first. If it contained something I felt inappropriate, I would have returned it, and explained why if asked. Why should I think that I have the right to deprive some other parent/kid from reading a book that *I* didn't approve of?

Maybe these cancel culture conjob "parents" should be paying more attention to their own parenting and quit worrying that someone else might read something they don't like.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. Usually the least involved parent complaining.
 
BidenPresident said:
Absolutely. Usually the least involved parent complaining.
Click to expand...

There's a rat-like being running for governor on the (R) ticket in our state, Michigan. One of the Reichwing catch phrases that he uses in his ads is "more parental authority." So what this means, of course, is that he and the rest of the QOP want to allow a vocal minority of RWNJ parents to dictate what books, curriculum, etc. are present in our state's public schools. I hope that reasonable, rational parents are paying close attention.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
There's a rat-like being running for governor on the (R) ticket in our state, Michigan. One of the Reichwing catch phrases that he uses in his ads is "more parental authority." So what this means, of course, is that he and the rest of the QOP want to allow a vocal minority of RWNJ parents to dictate what books, curriculum, etc. are present in our state's public schools. I hope that reasonable, rational parents are paying close attention.
Click to expand...

Outside of Ann Arbor, most people in Michigan are pretty stupid.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
When my kids were young I always looked at the books that they brought home on our once-a-week visits to the public library, as well as the books borrowed from the school library. If I had seen something I was concerned about, I would have read it to myself first. If it contained something I felt inappropriate, I would have returned it, and explained why if asked. Why should I think that I have the right to deprive some other parent/kid from reading a book that *I* didn't approve of?

Maybe these cancel culture conjob "parents" should be paying more attention to their own parenting and quit worrying that someone else might read something they don't like.
Click to expand...

WHite privelige much?

nigger moms can't read.

the edgelord is strong in me today.
 
AssHatZombie said:
WHite privelige much?

nigger moms can't read.

the edgelord is strong in me today.
Click to expand...

cZ8Scq.gif
 
Parents are not qualified to make decisions about education. More than that, they are not qualified to decide how everybody else's children should be taught. A book worth banning is a book worth reading. Banning books causes increased readership. Those are the books kids will pass around. When they read them, they will wonder what is wrong with their parents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top